Remco van de Meent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Oct 27, 1998 at 08:35:35AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
: Would it be possible for the sendmailconfig to update these databases?
: It wouldn't be that hard, I think. Also, how about updating the defailts
: so that they are stored in
don't think I can do the
makemaps automagically ;-{
--
Rick Nelson
On 28 Oct 1998, John Goerzen wrote:
Date: 28 Oct 1998 13:02:19 -0600
From: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Remco van de Meent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: **IMPORTANT** Slink sendmail
On Wed, Oct 28, 1998 at 03:39:51PM -0500, Richard A Nelson wrote:
: Without parsing /etc/mail/sendmail.mc, I can't tell what type of encoding
: is used for the databases, so I don't think I can do the makemaps
: automagically ;-{
People can't be obligated not to edit sendmail.cf, instead of
John Goerzen wrote:
Remco van de Meent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They default to /etc/mail, except for aliases.db, which should be in /etc
(Debian Policy, 4.5).
I know what policy says, but this is not how it works. mailertable,
etc. are in /etc and not /etc/mail.
You can put them
Would it be possible for the sendmailconfig to update these databases?
It wouldn't be that hard, I think. Also, how about updating the
defailts so that they are stored in /etc/mail instead of /etc?
John
Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The last update of sendmail switched from libdb
On Tue, Oct 27, 1998 at 08:35:35AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
: Would it be possible for the sendmailconfig to update these databases?
: It wouldn't be that hard, I think. Also, how about updating the defailts
: so that they are stored in /etc/mail instead of /etc?
They default to
The last update of sendmail switched from libdb to libdb2, as
recommended by the sendmail group (and requested by a sparc user).
Unfortunately, this change means that sendmail databases (alias,
users, etc.) *must* be rebuilt.
I'll update the package to provide this warning - but those who
have
7 matches
Mail list logo
