Re: *.deb vs. non "package" installs

1999-05-27 Thread Carl Mummert
>$ external-package --installed perl 5.00502 There is a special package, named 'equivs', that lets you do this. That is, it allows you to specify to dpkg that a certain dependency is met. Carl

Re: *.deb vs. non "package" installs

1999-05-27 Thread Eric E. Coe
Hello, This can be a big deal, especially with packages commonly placed in dependecy lists. For example: Perl. Debian-stable's version of Perl is 5.004xx and the upcoming release in unstable is essentially the same. :( But the current stable version of Perl on CPAN is 5.00502 - it's been out

Re: *.deb vs. non "package" installs

1999-05-21 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Paul" == Paul Schwebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paul> Would I be better off taking my *.tar.gz file and making a *.deb out of Paul> it? Do I have to wait until I find an updated *.deb on the web? Or is Paul> there some way to update/install software with *.tar.gz installs and Paul> m

*.deb vs. non "package" installs

1999-05-21 Thread Paul Schwebel
What's the best way to manage installed software on a Debian system? Say, for example, I install a *.deb package for software that I use. I then find a newer version of the software that I can download from the writer in *.tar.gz form. But since this isn't a *.deb package, deselct/dpkg isn't "awar