Re: Simple HTML & CSS code.

Peter Easthope wrote: > From: Siard > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 00:00:26 +0200 > > > >Test.html > > > > > left > right > > > > > Thanks. Yes, that puts "left" on the left and "right" on the right. After a good night's sleep, I realized that I could have answered

Re (3): Simple HTML & CSS code.

From: Siard Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 00:00:26 +0200 Test.html left right Thanks. Yes, that puts "left" on the left and "right" on the right. > BTW, 'color: black' and 'background: white' is already the default for > 'body', AFAIK. > More info about the Flexbox m

Re: Simple HTML & CSS code.

On 10/25/22, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > Hi, > > Off scope but I don't know a better place to ask. > > If this HTML text is in a file, a browser should be able to render it. > > > > > Test.html > > >body { color: black; background: white;

Re: Simple HTML & CSS code.

On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:14 -0500, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > Hi, > > Off scope but I don't know a better place to ask. > > If this HTML text is in a file, a browser should be able to render it. > > > > > Test.html > > >body { color: black; ba

Simple HTML & CSS code.

Hi, Off scope but I don't know a better place to ask. If this HTML text is in a file, a browser should be able to render it. Test.html body { color: black; background: white; } div.inline { display: inline; justify-content: space-between; } leftright In bullseye, Firefo

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

> Hardly an issue. Just do: > $ apt -s install dbus-x11 > NOTE: This is only a simulation! > apt needs root privileges for real execution. > Keep also in mind that locking is deactivated, > so don't depend on the relevance to the real current situation! > Reading package lists.

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

On Thu 29 Sep 2022 at 12:42:30 (+), jindam, vani wrote: > > unicorn:~$ apt install sl > > E: Could not open lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend - open (13: > > Permission denied) > > E: Unable to acquire the dpkg frontend lock (/var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend), > > are you root? > so, debian on

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

earlier, I'd want it to open wiki pages in lynx, so that I could check them; I'd set WPCleaner to use lynx as its browser. As it happens, I do set up lynx as the browser that mutt uses for reading HTML emails, mainly because of its -localhost option. I configure mutt with its own mailcap

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

> unicorn:~$ apt install sl > E: Could not open lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend - open (13: > Permission denied) > E: Unable to acquire the dpkg frontend lock (/var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend), > are you root? so, debian on device **warns** & **refuses** to download package. without thinking t

Choice of browser? [WAS Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html]

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 08:02:54AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2022-09-29 at 07:49, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > There are hints in this thtread as to where to configure your > > default browser. Update-alternatives is probably your friend here. If > > all of this is just to run the Wikipedi

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

On 2022-09-29 at 07:49, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > There are hints in this thtread as to where to configure your > default browser. Update-alternatives is probably your friend here. If > all of this is just to run the Wikipedia cleaner application, then > you may well want a GUI browser anyway to

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 04:47:37AM +, jindam, vani wrote: > > That puts quite a new complexion on the thread here called > > "how disable apt downloads w/o sudo". > > It might be worth being a bit more revealing about the > > system that you're running so that you don't waste other > > people's

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

quite in the manner to which we are accustomed. Then > > again, who knows? > > again as normal user: i expect os to > behave same, especially when you configure > or make a package as default, in my case > all html links whether present in gui > or cli OR apt stopping w

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

On 2022-09-29 at 07:22, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 04:47:37AM +, jindam, vani wrote: > >> as normal user i expected apt to show **some kind** of warning >> without providing root password installation of package will fail. > > unicorn:~$ apt install sl > E: Could not open

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 04:47:37AM +, jindam, vani wrote: > as normal user i expected apt to show **some > kind** of warning without providing > root password installation of package > will fail. unicorn:~$ apt install sl E: Could not open lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend - open (13: P

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

again as normal user: i expect os to behave same, especially when you configure or make a package as default, in my case all html links whether present in gui or cli OR apt stopping without root password. regards, jindam, vani toots: @jindam_v...@c.im others: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jindam_vani

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

> Hmm. The documentation isn't great. registration is not compulsory, anybody can edit it, feel free to contribute. > If the OP can't figure this out on their own, it might be time for them > to seek help from a dedicated WPCleaner support community. People who > actually know and use the appli

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

On 2022-09-28, David Wright wrote: > > So I think you mentioned userland.app or something. > Does that mean you're running all this on a mobile phone? > Its wikipedia says "UserLAnd does not require a root account." > That puts quite a new complexion on the thread here called > "how disable apt do

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

On Wed 28 Sep 2022 at 05:06:33 (+), jindam, vani wrote: > > A line like: > > export BROWSER=lynx > > in /etc/profile may help. > > i have updated ~/.profile, but it is not working > > > You don't indicate your desktop, which may be significant. > i am trying to use debian with least > packag

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

On 9/28/22 06:01, jindam, vani wrote: So you use openbox... and what, startx? Or some Display Manager (DM)? i have installed debian on userland app. trying to use or familiarise with linux. i think i am not using any DM. Also, how are you launching your "default browser"? Please be precise a

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 09:35:39AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > It's apparently an application: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WPCleaner Hmm. The documentation isn't great. On it says: For Mac and Linux, there's a

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

On 2022-09-28 at 09:29, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 01:01:05PM +, jindam, vani wrote: >>> Are you clicking underlined URLs in a terminal emulator (if so, >>> which one)? Clicking links in a GUI mail user agent (if so, >>> which one)? Something else? >> >> i am trying to

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 01:01:05PM +, jindam, vani wrote: > > So you use openbox... and what, startx? Or some Display Manager (DM)? > i have installed debian on userland app. I don't know what that means. Is that some sort of virtualization environment? Are you running Debian as a "guest OS

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

> So you use openbox... and what, startx? Or some Display Manager (DM)? i have installed debian on userland app. trying to use or familiarise with linux. i think i am not using any DM. > Also, how are you launching your "default browser"? Please be precise > and specific. right clicking provides

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 05:06:33AM +, jindam, vani wrote: > i am trying to use debian with least > packages. i dont have any desktop > environment. i have installed base system > + mc, default-jre, openbox, palemoon, lynx. So you use openbox... and what, startx? Or some Display Manager (DM

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

> Try "_" (underscore) instead. That way the string "SENSIBLE_BROWSER" is > interpreted by the shell as one whole variable name. $ echo $SENSIBLE_BROWSER its blank > It ist also good to copy the command and the output completey into mails > so everybody can exactly see what happened. pearl of

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

> Interesting, what does echo $"-browser" return? What does echo > "$-BROWSER" return? jindam@localhost:~$ -BROWSER -bash: -BROWSER: command not found regards, jindam, vani toots: @jindam_v...@c.im others: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jindam_vani > I'm on a system other than debian now otherwise

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2022 schrieb jindam, vani: > > It may be necessary to disable SENSIBLE-BROWSER. echo > > $SENSIBLE-BROWSER to see if it's loaded. > > $ echo $SENSIBLE-BROWSER > it shows "-BROWSER" Shell variables can't contain "-", so this is probably a typo. Then the shell replaces "$

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2022 schrieb Jude DaShiell: > Interesting, what does echo $"-browser" return?  What does echo > "$-BROWSER" return? > I'm on a system other than debian now otherwise I'd have answers for > you on both counts. $ echo "$-browser" himBHsbrowser $ echo "$-BROWSER" himBHsBRO

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

Interesting, what does echo $"-browser" return? What does echo "$-BROWSER" return? I'm on a system other than debian now otherwise I'd have answers for you on both counts. Jude "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

September 28, 2022 at 12:22 PM, "Jude DaShiell" wrote: > > It may be necessary to disable SENSIBLE-BROWSER. echo $SENSIBLE-BROWSER > to see if it's loaded. $ echo $SENSIBLE-BROWSER it shows "-BROWSER" $SENSIBLE-BROWSER launches lynx in terminal regards, jindam, vani toots: @jindam_v...@c.im

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

It may be necessary to disable SENSIBLE-BROWSER. echo $SENSIBLE-BROWSER to see if it's loaded. Jude "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940) . On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, jindam, vani wrote: > >

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

> A line like: > export BROWSER=lynx > in /etc/profile may help. i have updated ~/.profile, but it is not working > You don't indicate your desktop, which may be significant. i am trying to use debian with least packages. i dont have any desktop environment. i have installed base system + mc,

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

x browser". i have changed x-www-browser > to lynx. how do i configure my system to > use lynx browser for html files, open links, > open in external viewer, etc..? You don't indicate your desktop, which may be significant. For one thing, there may be other alternatives yo

Re: how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

ser > to lynx. how do i configure my system to > use lynx browser for html files, open links, > open in external viewer, etc..? > > $sudo update-alternatives --config www-browser > There is only one alternative in link group www-browser (providing > /usr/bin/www-browser): /usr/bin

how do i configure lynx browser as default browser for html

r to lynx. how do i configure my system to use lynx browser for html files, open links, open in external viewer, etc..? $sudo update-alternatives --config www-browser There is only one alternative in link group www-browser (providing /usr/bin/www-browser): /usr/bin/lynx Nothing to configure. $ update

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html andIcannotgetfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

The mad snipper strikes -- mwha ha haha On Thursday, June 23, 2022 04:05:40 PM Gareth Evans wrote: > > On 23 Jun 2022, at 01:46, gene heskett wrote: > > On 6/22/22 19:39, Gareth Evans wrote: > >> OK, but I mean do the non-robots.txt-compliant bots actually try to > >> submit passwords? > > > >

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html andIcannotgetfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

> On 23 Jun 2022, at 21:49, gene heskett wrote: > > On 6/23/22 16:08, Gareth Evans wrote: >> OK. That's not something I can help with from scratch, but I will watch >> with interest for further discussion. >> >> Best wishes, >> G > Well, it working in plain http, so until they get to be a

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html andIcannotgetfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

On 6/23/22 16:08, Gareth Evans wrote: OK. That's not something I can help with from scratch, but I will watch with interest for further discussion. Best wishes, G Well, it working in plain http, so until they get to be a nuisance, I have other irons smoking in the fire. Like some fine tuning

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html andIcannotgetfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

> On 23 Jun 2022, at 01:46, gene heskett wrote: > > On 6/22/22 19:39, Gareth Evans wrote: >>> On Wed 22 Jun 2022, at 22:42, gene heskett wrote: >>> On 6/22/22 16:51, Gareth Evans wrote: On Wed 22 Jun 2022, at 21:16, gene heskett wrote: > On 6/22/22 10:45, Gareth Evans wrote:

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html andIcannotgetfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

On 6/22/22 19:39, Gareth Evans wrote: On Wed 22 Jun 2022, at 22:42, gene heskett wrote: On 6/22/22 16:51, Gareth Evans wrote: On Wed 22 Jun 2022, at 21:16, gene heskett wrote: On 6/22/22 10:45, Gareth Evans wrote: [and I sniped a few kilobytes of.] I think I've got it, but I did find what m

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and Icannotgetfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

On Wed 22 Jun 2022, at 22:42, gene heskett wrote: > On 6/22/22 16:51, Gareth Evans wrote: >> On Wed 22 Jun 2022, at 21:16, gene heskett wrote: >>> On 6/22/22 10:45, Gareth Evans wrote: >>> [and I sniped a few kilobytes of.] >>> >>> I think I've got it, but I did find what may be a bug in mod auth

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and Icannotgetfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

On 6/22/22 16:51, Gareth Evans wrote: On Wed 22 Jun 2022, at 21:16, gene heskett wrote: On 6/22/22 10:45, Gareth Evans wrote: [and I sniped a few kilobytes of.] I think I've got it, but I did find what may be a bug in mod auth_plain. Its asking for a username and pw, but nothing seems to sati

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and Icannot getfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

On Wed 22 Jun 2022, at 21:16, gene heskett wrote: > On 6/22/22 10:45, Gareth Evans wrote: > [and I sniped a few kilobytes of.] > > I think I've got it, but I did find what may be a bug in mod auth_plain. > > Its asking for a username and pw, but nothing seems to satisfy it I didn't see you had re

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and Icannot getfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

;> After I found it with locate/ /usr/sbin is not in su's $PATH >>>>> That fixed the error, and I uncommented the stanza in apache2.conf >>>>> that points to the directory I want the server to access, and >>>>> localhost:port# displays the default startup

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and Icannot getfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

On 6/22/22 10:45, Gareth Evans wrote: [and I sniped a few kilobytes of.] I think I've got it, but I did find what may be a bug in mod auth_plain. Its asking for a username and pw, but nothing seems to satisfy it, so I disabled it, no man page hat I can find, and now its showing me the directory

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and Icannot getfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

t. But nowhere is the doc I've printed 10 pages of, is there an example of how to setup a local site. ISTR when I did this back in the fog of 2005 or so, that it was then all done in the html of the /var/www/gene/index.html. Robots.txt was also there but most robots ignored it, so I got addres

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and Icannot getfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

> On 21 Jun 2022, at 22:37, Gareth Evans wrote: > >  > >> On 21 Jun 2022, at 22:12, Gareth Evans wrote: >> >> On Tue 21 Jun 2022, at 20:16, gene heskett wrote: On 6/21/22 14:09, Gareth Evans wrote: On Tue 21 Jun 2022, at 18:06, gene heskett wrote: > On 6/21/22 12:11, Andre

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and Icannot getfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

> On 21 Jun 2022, at 22:12, Gareth Evans wrote: > > On Tue 21 Jun 2022, at 20:16, gene heskett wrote: >>> On 6/21/22 14:09, Gareth Evans wrote: >>> On Tue 21 Jun 2022, at 18:06, gene heskett wrote: On 6/21/22 12:11, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:55:56AM -040

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and Icannot getfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

On Tue 21 Jun 2022, at 20:16, gene heskett wrote: > On 6/21/22 14:09, Gareth Evans wrote: >> On Tue 21 Jun 2022, at 18:06, gene heskett wrote: >>> On 6/21/22 12:11, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:55:56AM -0400, gene heskett wrote: > Greetings all; > > So how

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html andIcannot getfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

On 6/21/22 15:30, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:16:11PM -0400, gene heskett wrote: /usr/sbin is not in su's $PATH https://wiki.debian.org/NewInBuster#Changes Thanks Greg just what Mr.Gene ordered. Take care & stay well. Cheers, Gene Heskett. -- "There are four boxes to be

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and Icannot getfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:16:11PM -0400, gene heskett wrote: > /usr/sbin is not in su's $PATH https://wiki.debian.org/NewInBuster#Changes

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and Icannot getfirefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

On 6/21/22 14:09, Gareth Evans wrote: On Tue 21 Jun 2022, at 18:06, gene heskett wrote: On 6/21/22 12:11, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:55:56AM -0400, gene heskett wrote: Greetings all; So how am I supposed to read these installed docs? Thanks all. Cheers, Gene Hesket

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and Icannot get firefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

On Tue 21 Jun 2022, at 18:06, gene heskett wrote: > On 6/21/22 12:11, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:55:56AM -0400, gene heskett wrote: >>> Greetings all; >>> >>> So how am I supposed to read these installed docs? >>> >>> Thanks all. >>> >>> Cheers, Gene Heskett. >>> -- >>

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and Icannot get firefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

On 6/21/22 12:26, Will Mengarini wrote: * gene heskett [22-06/21=Tu 11:55 -0400]: [Apache2 docs are in .html & Firefox won't access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir, so] how am I supposed to read these installed docs? Firefox disables file: URLs by default now, but you

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and Icannot get firefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

On 6/21/22 12:11, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:55:56AM -0400, gene heskett wrote: Greetings all; So how am I supposed to read these installed docs? Thanks all. Cheers, Gene Heskett. -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and amm

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and I cannot get firefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

* gene heskett [22-06/21=Tu 11:55 -0400]: > [Apache2 docs are in .html & Firefox won't access it using "file:"+ > /path/to/filedir, so] how am I supposed to read these installed docs? Firefox disables file: URLs by default now, but you can enable them. I found instruct

Re: I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and I cannot get firefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:55:56AM -0400, gene heskett wrote: > Greetings all; > > So how am I supposed to read these installed docs? > > Thanks all. > > Cheers, Gene Heskett. > -- > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that orde

I *think* I found the apache2 docs, but it's in .html and I cannot get firefox to access it using "file:"+ /path/to/filedir

Greetings all; So how am I supposed to read these installed docs? Thanks all. Cheers, Gene Heskett. -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940) If we desire respect for the law, we must first

Re: html only email

On Sunday 12 September 2021 07:59:49 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 06:59:35AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Had better have a very interesting subjct line or it does not get > > read here. I have, for security reasons, told kmail to not show > > html,

Re: html only email

On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 06:59:35AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > Had better have a very interesting subjct line or it does not get read > here. I have, for security reasons, told kmail to not show html, and to > override that takes up to 5 mouse clicks. And... instant black background

html only email

Had better have a very interesting subjct line or it does not get read here. I have, for security reasons, told kmail to not show html, and to override that takes up to 5 mouse clicks. Plain text that gets past spamassassin and clamav, does get read 100%. So the choice as to whether or not

Re: (HTML) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

On Lu, 06 sep 21, 16:46:24, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > > > Em 06/09/2021 14:25, John Hasler escreveu: > > Curt writes: > >> I suggest you follow the earlier advice, and set Thunderbird > >> to compose your email as plain text > > Or even as "normal"

Re: HTML mail [was: How to improve my question in stackoverflow?]

On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 15:22:30 -0400 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, September 10, 2021 08:45:19 AM Joe wrote: > > Sadly, much html comes of of MS software, and takes about ten pages > > of markup to include three text lines. > > That may be (or may be a slight exxage

Re: HTML mail [was: How to improve my question in stackoverflow?]

we have seen, some MUAs seem to do a miserable job when building the plain text part from the HTML (like forgetting line-ends, which wreaks havoc in source code). I didn't know that. This reduces my tolerance for HTML mail even in the multipart case. The problem there is that the sender is

Re: HTML mail [was: How to improve my question in stackoverflow?]

On Friday, September 10, 2021 08:45:19 AM Joe wrote: > Sadly, much html comes of of MS software, and takes about ten pages of > markup to include three text lines. That may be (or may be a slight exxageration ;-), but in my email client, if I get a multipart message, the plain text p

Re: HTML mail [was: How to improve my question in stackoverflow?]

On Friday, September 10, 2021 05:20:46 AM Pankaj Jangid wrote: > writes: > > (I'm just asking, because I've seen this complaint a couple > > of times for a well-formed multipart message: personally, I'd > > be OK with it, but I'd like to know how the consensus is). > > I feel that it is okay now

Re: HTML mail [was: How to improve my question in stackoverflow?]

On 2021-09-10, Charles Curley wrote: > (I also think that if one must use colors, emphasis, etc. as part of > one's writing, then one is not a very good writer. On the other > tentacle, one should not expect good writing from nerds.) > I think there was at least one book--or article or series of

Re: HTML mail [was: How to improve my question in stackoverflow?]

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:41:55AM +0200, Linux-Fan wrote: > to...@tuxteam.de writes: [...] > Additionally, in this C++ question thread, the source code was given > in HTML and text parts of the e-mail and while the `#include` > statements were all on separate lines in the HTML, th

Re: HTML mail [was: How to improve my question in stackoverflow?]

it, but I'd like to know how the consensus is). > > I think it has problems. One case is where the author composes in > HTML, and uses colors, emphasis, etc. to make his points, and those > are stripped out of the plain text version, thereby distorting the > author's intent

Re: HTML mail [was: How to improve my question in stackoverflow?]

where the author composes in HTML, and uses colors, emphasis, etc. to make his points, and those are stripped out of the plain text version, thereby distorting the author's intent. (I also think that if one must use colors, emphasis, etc. as part of one's writing, then one is not a very

Re: HTML mail [was: How to improve my question in stackoverflow?]

ll several pages to read about ten lines, of which three have useful content. Also, hyperlinks are usually absent, so if I want to see one (I don't use links in emails from strangers) I need to pick through the html to find it. -- Joe

Re: HTML mail [was: How to improve my question in stackoverflow?]

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 08:41:02AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: The original mail was a passable MIME multipart/alternative with a plain text part. I /think/ that is OK, what do others think? I think that's perfectly reasonable. There /can/ be good reasons for people to include a HTML

Re: HTML mail [was: How to improve my question in stackoverflow?]

to...@tuxteam.de writes: On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 07:45:43PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote: [...] > First, most folks on tech mailinglists despise HTML email. The original mail was a passable MIME multipart/alternative with a plain text part. I /think/ that is OK, what do others th

Re: HTML mail [was: How to improve my question in stackoverflow?]

writes: > (I'm just asking, because I've seen this complaint a couple > of times for a well-formed multipart message: personally, I'd > be OK with it, but I'd like to know how the consensus is). I feel that it is okay now to send we formatted multipart messages. As long as I am getting text part

HTML mail [was: How to improve my question in stackoverflow?]

On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 07:45:43PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote: [...] > First, most folks on tech mailinglists despise HTML email. The original mail was a passable MIME multipart/alternative with a plain text part. I /think/ that is OK, what do others think? Perhaps you can teach you mailer

Re: Partially Solved: OT: Why have I not received any messages from Dedeco (was: Re: (HTML) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright))

On Tuesday, September 07, 2021 12:27:32 PM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > Can you add Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org to your > > whitelist? Or isn't it possible to use Resent-From? > > Thanks, I'll have to look into that -- that would be something I have to do > for / at google and I

Re: Partially Solved: OT: Why have I not received any messages from Dedeco (was: Re: (HTML) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright))

One or two days after i tried to subscribe using the site, I received a warning from this list saying that several messages were bounced by Yahoo. It also said that if more bounces happen, i may be unsubscribed. So, the subscribing messages i tried to make did not even arrived to my spam folder - i

Re: Partially Solved: OT: Why have I not received any messages from Dedeco (was: Re: (HTML) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright))

Thanks for the reply, some responses interspersed below: On Tuesday, September 07, 2021 11:07:36 AM David Wright wrote: > On Tue 07 Sep 2021 at 08:49:19 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > -- I don't remember that message very well). > > Probably like: > > "In the last seven days we've seen

Re: Partially Solved: OT: Why have I not received any messages from Dedeco (was: Re: (HTML) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright))

On Tue 07 Sep 2021 at 08:49:19 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > I occasionally seem to lose other messages (I get the message from the debian- > user lists about about some (small number of) messages beeing undeliverable > in the last day or so (can't remember the term used, and maybe there

Partially Solved: OT: Why have I not received any messages from Dedeco (was: Re: (HTML) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright))

e messages were delivered but google decided they were spam. I wonder what criteria google used to decide they were spam? Do they know something we don't know, or is just because he used HTML and somehow google knows the list is intended to be plain text? Draft start of old message below: I am p

Re: (HTML) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 3:47 PM Dedeco Balaco wrote: > > > Em 06/09/2021 14:25, John Hasler escreveu: > > Curt writes: > > I suggest you follow the earlier advice, and set Thunderbird > to compose your email as plain text > > Or even as "normal" HTML. &g

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

Makefile [last] only one problem, the XSLT file or xsltproc tool (?) doesn't seem to transform the HTML into RSS, really, output is basically a text file with no markup whatsoever except for the first line which is TLDR: What you describe will happen when none of an XSLT stylesheet&#x

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

On 2021-05-12, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > Going directly to https://interglacial.com/tpj/26/ gives 403. > > Going directly to https://interglacial.com/ works. > >>From there, clicking https://interglacial.com/tpj/ gives 403. > > So, it's *probably* not a referer check. It could be a permissions > s

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

Greg Wooledge wrote: > Going directly to https://interglacial.com/tpj/26/ > gives 403. Now it is 403 but the other day I got 404 so it seems the webmaster is working on the situation... -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

David Wright wrote: > Here you go Thanks! -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

> >>> Having read through the rather old > >>> https://interglacial.com/tpj/26/ it looked to me as though the OP > >>> is halfway there. > >> The Perl Journal? What do you mean? (URL gives a 404) > I checked again just now, and I still get errors from that URL and its > parent directory, but they

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 03:03:33PM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote: Andrei POPESCU wrote: let's see, first write HTML, then include it in Markdown, then have the static site generator generate HTML Surely there must be some site generator with RSS support that takes "plain" HTM

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

e unlike so many web >>> pages I see. >> >> Well, thank you, pretty simple HTML I'd imagine but I guess one can >> screw up even simple tasks... >> >>> Having read through the rather old >>> https://interglacial.com/tpj/26/ it looked to me as tho

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

David Wright wrote: > BTW I downloaded one of the pages [...] just out of > interest, the code looked laid out very clearly — quite > unlike so many web pages I see. Well, thank you, pretty simple HTML I'd imagine but I guess one can screw up even simple tasks... > Having

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

On Wed 12 May 2021 at 03:15:38 (+0200), Emanuel Berg wrote: > David Wright wrote: > > > BTW I downloaded one of the pages [...] just out of > > interest, the code looked laid out very clearly — quite > > unlike so many web pages I see. > > Well, thank you, pretty

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

w). My comment was in recognition that the OP seems less concerned now about generating and discarding redundant formats. That's very different from "I would if it would do what I want[,] namely get an RSS file and only that." > > That is: if you write a set of HTML files complet

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

On 10/05/2021 19:30, Emanuel Berg wrote: OK so no XSLT, no yacc for me, I got another idea, can you use the static generators, get the RSS, then discard everything else and use the RSS on the regular or real site? The links in the RSS will be pointing to the articles using the file names and p

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

On Lu, 10 mai 21, 19:23:02, David Wright wrote: > On Tue 11 May 2021 at 00:30:24 (+0200), Emanuel Berg wrote: > > > > OK so no XSLT, no yacc for me, I got another idea, can you use > > the static generators, get the RSS, then discard everything > > else and use the RSS on the regular or real site?

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

>> I parsed the question as being about whether the resulting >> rss.xml would be compatible with the input data, rather >> than with the rest of the output data generated by the >> static generator. >> >> That is: if you write a set of HTML files completely by

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

The Wanderer wrote: > I parsed the question as being about whether the resulting > rss.xml would be compatible with the input data, rather than > with the rest of the output data generated by the > static generator. > > That is: if you write a set of HTML files completely b

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

David Wright wrote: > AFAICT no trees will be destroyed or animals be harmed when > you throw away any output that is generated in excess of > what you want. Haha :) -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

After having limited success with XSLT after a lot of work, and after failing doing a grammar that would add two ints, I don't feel like doing all HTML to RSS :D LOL - have a look https://dataswamp.org/~incal/rss/parser/add.grm What's wrong? Looks right to me! That's SML BTW,

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

On 2021-05-10 at 20:23, David Wright wrote: > On Tue 11 May 2021 at 00:30:24 (+0200), Emanuel Berg wrote: > >> After having limited success with XSLT after a lot of work, and >> after failing doing a grammar that would add two ints, I don't feel >> like doing all HTM

Re: generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files

On Tue 11 May 2021 at 00:30:24 (+0200), Emanuel Berg wrote: > After having limited success with XSLT after a lot of work, > and after failing doing a grammar that would add two ints, > I don't feel like doing all HTML to RSS :D LOL - have a look > > https://dataswamp.o

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >