On Wednesday 24 January 2007 21:39, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> Personally, opening up an HTML document in vi and hacking away at it is
> much easier than using a WYSIWYG editor. But then, I think that writing
> a LaTeX document in vi is much easier than editing a document in word
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:39:49PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
>
> Sorry wrong wording on my part. When I said "it should look exactly as it
> would appear on the net", I meant the editor to have a WYSIWYG way of editing
> html pages.
>
> HTML editing sh
am
> > looking for. While editing the page, it should look exactly as it would
> > appear on the net.
>
> I think that your approach is misguided. The closest to WYSIWYG you
> will get is that the HTML editor/composer you are using will show you
> what pages will look l
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 14:03, Glenn Becker wrote:
> > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic
> > HTML stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no
> > complex CSS capabilities are necessary.
>
> Bluefish or Quanta are
Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML
> stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex
> CSS capabilities are necessary.
Amaya sounds like it's what you're looking for. It produc
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 15:22 -0500, celejar wrote:
> On 1/24/07, Glenn Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML
> > > stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no comp
as it would appear on the
> net.
>
I think that your approach is misguided. The closest to WYSIWYG you
will get is that the HTML editor/composer you are using will show you
what pages will look like in browsers that use the exact same rendering
engine as the compose tool. Think about this for
Bluefish does WYSIWYG ? I thought it is "merely" an HTML editor.
you are correct, my inner filter made me leap right over WYSIWYG. sorry.
gb
+-+
Glenn Becker - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lo
On 1/24/07, Glenn Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML
> stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex CSS
> capabilities are necessary.
Bluefish or Quanta are nice editors,
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 14:04 -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> I used to use nvu. But looks like it has been removed from Debian. I do not
> want to edit any text files. So vim, emacs etc., are not what I am looking
> for. While editing the page, it should look exactly as it would appear on the
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 14:04 -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML
> stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex CSS
> capabilities are necessary.
>
> I used to use nvu. But lo
Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML
stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex CSS
capabilities are necessary.
Bluefish or Quanta are nice editors, or there's html-helper-mode in Emacs.
If you like real basic, there&
Can anyone recommend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor? I require very basic HTML
stuff like lists, tables, formatting, inserting images etc., no complex CSS
capabilities are necessary.
I used to use nvu. But looks like it has been removed from Debian. I do not
want to edit any text files. So vim
Am 2006-11-16 22:37:26, schrieb T:
> hi, I found I'd like to talk to myself recently. :-)
>
> $ echo 'sed "s/ / /g" < f1 > f2' | perl -MHTML::Entities -pe
> 'encode_entities($_)'
^
Are you sure, you want to convert ALL to ?
> sed "s/ / /g" < f1 > f2
>
> Any
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:59:37 -0500, T wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any tools can help me encode html entities? E.g.
>
> from
>
> sed "s/ / /g" < f1 > f2
>
> to
>
> sed "s/ / /g" < f1 > f2
>
> ?
>
> thanks
hi,
Hi
Any tools can help me encode html entities? E.g.
from
sed "s/ / /g" < f1 > f2
to
sed "s/ / /g" < f1 > f2
?
thanks
--
Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply)
http://xpt.sourceforge.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
.
somehow seamonkey (as well as mozilla) refuses to accept
html-messages from the outside. i am working with etch, kernel
2.6.16-2-k7 and an AMD sempron processor on a (new)
asus-amd-motherbaord with nvidia-chips.
what can i do to be able to receive html-mail? what do i do wrong?
is their a
seamonkey (as well as mozilla) refuses to accept
html-messages from the outside. i am working with etch, kernel
2.6.16-2-k7 and an AMD sempron processor on a (new)
asus-amd-motherbaord with nvidia-chips.
what can i do to be able to receive html-mail? what do i do wrong?
is their a solution for this
accept
html-messages from the outside. i am working with etch, kernel
2.6.16-2-k7 and an AMD sempron processor on a (new)
asus-amd-motherbaord with nvidia-chips.
what can i do to be able to receive html-mail? what do i do wrong?
is their a solution for this?
with seamonkey itself seems nothing
On 10/09/2006 07:12 AM, steef wrote:
hi list,
i am using seamonkey (last version) nowadays as mail sending and
receiving program; i am maintainer of two mailing lists for farmers in
the netherlands, belgium and france.
somehow seamonkey (as well as mozilla) refuses to accept html-messages
hi list,
i am using seamonkey (last version) nowadays as mail sending and
receiving program; i am maintainer of two mailing lists for farmers in
the netherlands, belgium and france.
somehow seamonkey (as well as mozilla) refuses to accept html-messages
from the outside. i am working with
and posted a link to your site, on thispage:
http://www.cyclebids.com/motorcycle-links_motorcycle_resources_4.html
As you know, reciprocal linking benefits both of us by raising our searchrankings and generating more traffic to both of our sites. Please post alink to my site as follows:
Title: Mot
Dear Debian,
Do you know of a program that will recursively search webpages for a given
expression, starting at a given URL (or in my case I usually want to
search local pages, e.g. file://~m/downloadedpages/index.html)?
It should be reasonably easy to script something together with wget, se
On 2006-05-05 @ 18:48:36 (week 18) H.S. wrote:
> Casey T. Deccio wrote:
>
> >
> > find . -name "*.html" | xargs sed -i.bak -e
> > 's/string_to_replace/replacement/g'
> >
> > Does something like this work? If your match pattern span
Casey T. Deccio wrote:
>
> find . -name "*.html" | xargs sed -i.bak -e
> 's/string_to_replace/replacement/g'
>
> Does something like this work? If your match pattern spans more than
> one line than you'll need a more complex script.
>
> Casey
suggest the best way to use grep and sed to make these changes?
The main problems are matching HTML code over a number of lines and
replacing all of them. I am not averse to using perl either if I could
get a starting point. All relevant suggestions are welcome. BTW, I have
Debian Etch and Sid
the best way to use grep and sed to make these changes?
> The main problems are matching HTML code over a number of lines and
> replacing all of them. I am not averse to using perl either if I could
> get a starting point. All relevant suggestions are welcome. BTW, I have
> Debian Etch
and replace code in php or html files
Linas Žvirblis wrote:
>
> Check out "rpl" package.
>
I will take a look, thanks.
>
> See if it contains a "generator" meta tag. Other than that, sites made
> with Frontpage will contain all sorts of errors,
Linas Žvirblis wrote:
>
> Check out "rpl" package.
>
I will take a look, thanks.
>
> See if it contains a "generator" meta tag. Other than that, sites made
> with Frontpage will contain all sorts of errors, MS specific code etc.
> This is not a scientific definition, but if it looks like cra
H.S. wrote:
> The problem is to change a particular link in all the pages. I assume
> the webpages were made using a template. If I were to search and replace
> a particular string with a the new desired one, I would be done.
Check out "rpl" package.
> As an aside, given the webpage, is there an
particular link in all the pages. I assume
the webpages were made using a template. If I were to search and replace
a particular string with a the new desired one, I would be done. Could
somebody suggest the best way to use grep and sed to make these changes?
The main problems are matching HTML code
Matt England wrote:
> (My bad for sending out html-formatted text to the list...here's the
> unstyled text. -Matt)
>
> (I realize this may be a faq, but this 'useradd -m' is hard to google...)
>
> Summary:
>
> Is there a more-portable way to add users
(My bad for sending out html-formatted text to the list...here's the
unstyled text. -Matt)
(I realize this may be a faq, but this 'useradd -m' is hard to google...)
Summary:
Is there a more-portable way to add users to a system then useradd(8)?
Why does Debian's user
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Anyone have a recommendation?
I want to parse HTML files in C++ or C.
SAX for C/C++
or
Flex (man flex)
--
Mladen Adamovic
http://home.blic.net/adamm
http://www.shortopedia.com
http://www.froola.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 06:12 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems there should be many of these.
> Anyone have a recommendation?
> I want to parse HTML files in C++ or C.
> Thanks!
if you are dealing with xhtml then you could use one of the many xml c++
parsers.
Hi,
It seems there should be many of these.
Anyone have a recommendation?
I want to parse HTML files in C++ or C.
Thanks!
H
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Any ideas?
I found gnuhtml2latex (on debian sarge), but that one has as mayor
drawbacks:
- poor/wrong rendering of spcial characters (eg. umlauts)
- supports only latex 2.09
I have a rather long html document (many pages), that looks just
awfull as html
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Any ideas?
>
> I found gnuhtml2latex (on debian sarge), but that one has as mayor
> drawbacks:
> - poor/wrong rendering of spcial characters (eg. umlauts)
> - supports only latex 2.09
>
> I have a rather long html document (many pages), tha
Any ideas?
I found gnuhtml2latex (on debian sarge), but that one has as mayor
drawbacks:
- poor/wrong rendering of spcial characters (eg. umlauts)
- supports only latex 2.09
I have a rather long html document (many pages), that looks just awfull
as html. Transition via html2text would
On 1/18/06, Виталий Ищенко <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where I can find Nautilus thumbnailers for html files
> and also for doc,OOo1.1 and OOo2 files
I have also noticed this since upgrading to Sid's 2.12. What's going on?
Where I can find Nautilus thumbnailers for html files
and also for doc,OOo1.1 and OOo2 files
thanks in advance
I was wondering if somebody could recommend html package with a special
feature. I was wondering what package could make a system of webpages and
build an index page. Not the index page in the sense of the first page
encountered, but an index like in the back of a book.
Reason I want to do this
> Mitch Wiedemann wanted us to know:
>On the topic mentioned above, I find HTML e-mail useful sometimes, but I
>wouldn't send it to an e-mail list unless it was a generally accepted
>practice on the specific list.
Some people use text based MUAs that do not support html. Thus
Scott wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 12 November 2005 14:35, Steve Lamb wrote:
I looked at Thunderbird because a friend was raving about it. It
didn't impress me, but then I'm used to kmail from kde 3.3.0.
Html doodads are nothing but a PITA that quadruples the s
urky goo of
useful (and non-useful) posts. Please, if you're sharing useful info
based on the "Request to remove" thread, start a new thread. That'll
make it easier for people reading archives and such.
On the topic mentioned above, I find HTML e-mail useful sometimes, bu
Am Dienstag 08 November 2005 14:30 schrieb Armin ranjbar:
> anyone known a way to convert CHM files into plain html or pdf files
chmlib can handle chm files:
~$ apt-get install chmlib-bin
~$ man extract_chmLib
extracts a chm file into a directory
xchm uses chmlib, so try to print from x
On Monday 07 November 2005 13:30, Armin ranjbar wrote:
> anyone known a way to convert CHM files into plain html or pdf files ?
I don't know of any "ready-made" way to do it, but this might be useful
if you know python.
Package: python-chm
State: not installed
Version
anyone known a way to convert CHM files into plain html or pdf files ?
--
You will be surprised by a loud noise.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday, 07.09.2005 at 13:13 +0100, Peter J Ross wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:52:28AM +0100, Peter J Ross wrote:
>
> > Drifting further off-topic, I notice that Mozilla Thunderbird
> > defaults to sending html email.
>
> No it doesn't, as I've lear
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:52:28AM +0100, Peter J Ross wrote:
> Drifting further off-topic, I notice that Mozilla Thunderbird defaults
> to sending html email.
No it doesn't, as I've learned after too hastily submitting a wishlist
bug (#327011). The default is to *compose* as HT
6 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
> > >> > Any way, have you any advice
> > >>
> > >> not using HTML...
> > >
> > > Using mutt, I see no html. Is this a bug or a feature of mutt?
> > > (I do often get html attachments - and also qu
On Tuesday, 06.09.2005 at 06:51 +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> It's just that people on the list sometimes complain that someone has
> posted in html when it comes through as normal text for me, whereas I
> sometimes do get html attachments.
Some clients will send *both* plain text
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 09:05:31PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> Some MUAs can be configured to send the same message as both a plain
> text message and an HTML message, nothing very magical and only slightly
> more wastful than HTML alone.
Yes, I've noticed that. Wasteful maybe
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:26:48PM -0400, Allan Wind wrote:
> On 2005-09-06T03:47:55+0200, David Jardine wrote:
> > (a) the difference in the way mutt deals with html emails
> > (sometimes outputting them as normal text, sometimes presenting
> > them as attachm
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 05:06:22PM -0700, James Vahn wrote:
> David Jardine wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:09:31PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 16:36 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
> >> > Any way, have you any ad
> > > On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 16:36 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
> > > > > Any way, have you any advice
> > > >
> > > > not using HTML...
> > >
> > > Using mutt, I see no html. Is this a bug or a feature of mutt?
> > >
On 2005-09-06T03:47:55+0200, David Jardine wrote:
> (a) the difference in the way mutt deals with html emails
> (sometimes outputting them as normal text, sometimes presenting
> them as attachments),
I do not understand the question. By default mutt list html
gt; > Any way, have you any advice
> > >
> > > not using HTML...
> >
> > Using mutt, I see no html. Is this a bug or a feature of mutt?
> > (I do often get html attachments - and also quite a lot of html
> > source code from spammers.)
> >
&
David Jardine wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:09:31PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
>> On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 16:36 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
>> > Any way, have you any advice
>>
>> not using HTML...
>
> Using mutt, I see no html. Is this a
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 01:04:58AM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:09:31PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 16:36 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
> > > Any way, have you any advice
> >
> > not using HTML...
>
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:09:31PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 16:36 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
> > Any way, have you any advice
>
> not using HTML...
Using mutt, I see no html. Is this a bug or a feature of mutt?
(I do often get html at
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Matt Price wrote:
> > images makes simple "cat $html" not work either, otherwise,
> > cat $html | lpr -Ppostscriptprinter -
> >
> wouldn't this just print the text that is contained in an html file (as
> opposed to a rendered/for
Alvin Oga wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Matt Price wrote:
...
wget -m -k http://some.website.com/
and then:
#! /bin/bash
find /path/to/top/level -type f -iname *.html | while read file; do
html2ps -gn $file > "$file".ps ;
done
find /path/to/top/level -type f -iname *.html | whil
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Matt Price wrote:
...
> wget -m -k http://some.website.com/
>
> and then:
>
> #! /bin/bash
> find /path/to/top/level -type f -iname *.html | while read file; do
> html2ps -gn $file > "$file".ps ;
> done
> find /path/to/top/level -
to do automatically, e.g. with:
wget -m -k http://some.website.com/
and then:
#! /bin/bash
find /path/to/top/level -type f -iname *.html | while read file; do
html2ps -gn $file > "$file".ps ;
done
find /path/to/top/level -type f -iname *.html | while read psfile; do
lpr $psfile
done
u
Is there a Debian program which will allow me to
convert a .ged file to html (or pdf) and print
the out put?
Does anyone know how to do this simply, please?
Thanks, John.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ether hardware is detected properly or not? Use *"lspci -vv"*
Does anyone else see this as a tiny script font? Is HTML allowed on
this list? Not to mention top-posting and not trimming already read
information.
Paul Scott
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi
I have 2 pc using debian sid... and both of them had a
recent dist-upgrade. (so I use gnome 2.10 on both)
One of them show a preview of HTML pages in nautilus
and the other does not
What is the library/plugin I am missing to get the
rendering of HTML page in nautilus as an icon? This is
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 03:54:48PM +0200, roberto wrote:
> --- Colin Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> > aptitude install debian-reference-en
>
> thanks, it works, but how to use lynx to display this
> debian-reference-en instead of konqueror, which is automatically
> started in my sys
Hi,
I am trying to print an html copy of some documentation.
I want to avoid having to load all the pages individually into a browser
(konqueror or mozilla) and print them. I would like to automate the printing.
Method 1 idea:
i) Convert html -> ps pages via html.ps
ii) assemble multi
--- Colin Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> >
> aptitude install debian-reference-en
>
thanks, it works, but how to use lynx to display this debian-reference-en
instead of konqueror,
which is automatically started in my system?
bye
Roberto
Debian Sarge
kernel 2.6.8
On (05/07/05 15:01), roberto wrote:
> Hello
> i wonder if it is possible to download the entire debian reference in html
> format, with ALL its
> internal links and pages.
> I have downloaded it from
> http://www.us.debian.org/doc/user-manuals#quick-reference
> but when i
roberto wrote:
Hello
i wonder if it is possible to download the entire debian reference in html
format, with ALL its
internal links and pages.
aptitude install debian-reference-en
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
Hello
i wonder if it is possible to download the entire debian reference in html
format, with ALL its
internal links and pages.
I have downloaded it from
http://www.us.debian.org/doc/user-manuals#quick-reference
but when i try to access it off-line lynx tells me that it is impossible to
open
On May 23 2005, Deboo ^ wrote:
> Is there a html to pdf converter utility/script or any such thing
> available for debian? I could not find using apt search.
The program/package htmldoc works wonderfully for my taste and since it
lets you use Times, Courier and Helvetica as fonts for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Deboo ^ said:
> Is there a html to pdf converter utility/script or any such thing
> available for debian? I could not find using apt search.
you can use a combination of html2ps and ps2pdf. They are both available
as deb packages.
- --
on Mon, May 23, 2005 at 02:59:19PM -0400, Deboo ^ ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Is there a html to pdf converter utility/script or any such thing
> available for debian? I could not find using apt search.
You've got HTML to PS. Then PS to PDF is trivial. The GS scripts
require a
On 5/23/05, Deboo ^ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/23/05, Glenn English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 14:59 -0400, Deboo ^ wrote:
> > > Is there a html to pdf converter utility/script or any such thing
> > > available for de
On 5/23/05, Glenn English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 14:59 -0400, Deboo ^ wrote:
> > Is there a html to pdf converter utility/script or any such thing
> > available for debian? I could not find using apt search.
>
> Have you considered bringing u
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 14:59 -0400, Deboo ^ wrote:
> Is there a html to pdf converter utility/script or any such thing
> available for debian? I could not find using apt search.
Have you considered bringing up the file in a browser and "printing" it
to a pdf file?
--
Glen
Is there a html to pdf converter utility/script or any such thing
available for debian? I could not find using apt search.
Regards,
Deboo
--
Please don't Cc: me, I'm subscribed to the list.
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 12:52:49 -0500, Scotty Fitzgerald
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would like something that would generate hypertext links
> automatically for me. I normally like very simple HTML,
> paragraph, header, and image tags. Yet I would like something
> tha
Could somebody tell me what they think the best package for
HTML webpage generation in Woody is please?
I would like something that would generate hypertext links
automatically for me. I normally like very simple HTML,
paragraph, header, and image tags. Yet I would like something
that would
Shaikh Quader wrote:
> For example, a drop-down menu generated from the following html is easily
> visible in Internet Explorer. But the drop-down isn't visible when the
> web page is opened from Mozilla/Firefox.
>
>
>href="member.html">Members
>
Shaikh Quader wrote:
Could anyone please tell me how to enable the drop-down menu support for
Mozilla/Firefox?
For example, a drop-down menu generated from the following html
The HTML simply describes a number of generic blocks and links (its very
poor markup, whomever came up with it should be
Could anyone please tell me how to enable the drop-down menu support for
Mozilla/Firefox?
For example, a drop-down menu generated from the following html is easily
visible in Internet Explorer. But the drop-down isn't visible when the web
page is opened from Mozilla/Firefox.
Me
* Dan Jacobson wrote:
>Any package for converting the average bloated webpage into slim and
>trim HTML for a turn of the century browser on a weakling black and
>white PDA?
Well, that depends on what you consider slim and trim here, Tidy
corrects many things and is able to replace so
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 05:32:14AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Any package for converting the average bloated webpage into slim and
> trim HTML for a turn of the century browser on a weakling black and
> white PDA?
>
> "tidy" even with all options turned on isn't
Dan Jacobson wrote:
Any package for converting the average bloated webpage into slim and
trim HTML for a turn of the century browser on a weakling black and
white PDA?
There is a perl script developed by the BBC to turn pages into something
accessible - it's called 'betsie'. Yo
Any package for converting the average bloated webpage into slim and
trim HTML for a turn of the century browser on a weakling black and
white PDA?
"tidy" even with all options turned on isn't aggressive enough. Maybe
I will just end up doing lynx -dump|txt2html.
--
To UNSUBS
Rodney Richison wrote (20-11-2004 21:03):
Is there a "debian way" to install this rather than cpan?
cpan
install HTML::Parser
Just curious
apt-get install libhtml-parser-perl
--
René Seindal ([EMAIL PROTECTED])http://linux.seindal.dk/
Seindal Consult
Is there a "debian way" to install this rather than cpan?
cpan
install HTML::Parser
Just curious
--
Highest Regards,
*Rodney Richison [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
*RCR Computing www.rcrcomputing.com <http://www.rcrcomputing.com/>*
*PO Box 566 - 118 N. Br
pache-ssl
to complement an existing apache installation. It works as far as
opening SSL connections, but weirdly can only display HTML documents.
Anything else (images, PHP files) is either shown as a broken link
icon or offered as a download. Exactly the same tree of files,
viewed through a
I love vim too, so whatever you decide to use it is ok,
I think vim is a very powerful tool, and I love that
editor, what I know is that which ever of both are a
good option to edit ;).
Regards.
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:55:30 -0400, Silvan wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 31 August 2004 01:04 pm, Joris Hui
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 01:04 pm, Joris Huizer wrote:
> > I think that the best editor that you can use is emacs,
> > you can edit whatever you want there even assembler.
> >
> > I recomend that one, besides you can run commands
> > whithin it.
> Well, you can do all that in vim too ;) Don't ca
On Wednesday 01 September 2004 17:05, cr wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 01:29, Robert Parker wrote:
> > On Tuesday 31 August 2004 18:08, cr wrote:
> > > On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:31, Francisco Borges wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I ha
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 01:29, Robert Parker wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 August 2004 18:08, cr wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:31, Francisco Borges wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I haven't build HTML pages in years and I'm looking for an editor that
>
emacs gives you the ability to sit down at almost any
'nix and get work done.
Lots of things to consider. My dream program of course would be an html gui
such as quanta or bluefish wrapped around the vim editor. Then all would be
right in the world ;)
Cheers,
Ben
Quoting Joris Huizer <
Sergio Basurto wrote:
I think that the best editor that you can use is emacs,
you can edit whatever you want there even assembler.
Ummm...
Any text editor can edit assember language,
Midnight Commander has nice editor,
MC also shows html-crap properly formatted,
so you can type your text and then
Sorry if the statement hurt in any way, I agree with
you its a matter of taste and I think my statement was
bad formed, I mean at least for me is the best and
obviously there are a lot goo editors out there.
Well for my experience emacs is a good one.
Regards.
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:04:02 +0200,
701 - 800 of 1490 matches
Mail list logo
