Steve Lamb wrote:
I just did a search for debian sata dvd burner.
Here's the link:
snip
You're right. Apparently I didn't do enough testing, or the problem was
temporary,
and now seems to be limited to the sourceforge lists or at least backuppc-user,
and google is vindicated for how.
Steve Lamb wrote:
Marty wrote:
I don't see what legitimate purpose it might serve, and I wonder if the
posters' wishes or search engine users' interests, or even public
interests, enter into consideration? I suppose not.
The public has no interest.
But google shareholders do? I hope
Marty wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
The public has no interest.
But google shareholders do? I hope that's not what you mean.
Nope. Simply pointing out that the public is an entity which in and of
itself has no interests. The public is a collection of individuals, each of
whom have thier
Steve Lamb wrote:
Marty wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
The public has no interest.
But google shareholders do? I hope that's not what you mean.
Nope. Simply pointing out that the public is an entity which in and of
itself has no interests. The public is a collection of individuals,
Marty wrote:
I wonder how SPI would respond to that statement.
Would be interesting, wouldn't it. I mean you are talking about a
collective of individuals who have decided that some software should be
funded. Just because they say it is in the public interest doesn't mean the
public wants
Steve Lamb wrote:
Again, Google obscures nothing. Just
because Google doesn't return the hits you're expecting doesn't mean they're
obscured, either. Just means your search is not specific enough. No more, no
less. Hardly anything insidious in that.
I seem to recall previously getting
Marty wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
No, it's just some recent change that google made.
So you claim. And your proof is... what?
See my answer above.
What you gave was not proof. It was supposition based on your
observations on a *dynamic system*. IE, the same term used today is not in
7 matches
Mail list logo
