On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 08:15:44PM +0200, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> >When it asks you for a passphrase, hit twice - you have a null
> >passphrase (which is fractionally less secure but that's probably OK.)
>
> Not so much "fractionally less secure" as "insecure". If the
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 08:15:44PM +0200, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> Not so much "fractionally less secure" as "insecure". If the machine
> containing the private key is compromised so, potentially, is every
> machine that the public key has been distributed too.
Though if you want to prevent one
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
When it asks you for a passphrase, hit twice - you have a null
passphrase (which is fractionally less secure but that's probably OK.)
Not so much "fractionally less secure" as "insecure". If the machine
containing the private key is compromised so, potentially, is eve
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:26:05PM -0400, Bruce Corbin wrote:
> Thanks. I'll read up on certificates and read the link at the bottom of
> your reply. It's not sinking in at the moment but hopefully it will
> after a little reading.
>
> With respect to the problem: I want to have files on my "
Thanks. I'll read up on certificates and read the link at the bottom of
your reply. It's not sinking in at the moment but hopefully it will
after a little reading.
With respect to the problem: I want to have files on my "server" at
home and have my laptop be the only "out of house" machine
5 matches
Mail list logo
