On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 08:57 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
[snip] I mostly agree with you on your discourse on HAL, please note
that I din't argue against HAL per se but only against being
forced to use it on every hardware I want to use current X on.
> What surprises me is how long
On 2009-08-04_16:05:49, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 07:12 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 2009-08-04 06:14, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> > >On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 18:13 +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> > >>On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 09:28 -0500, Chris wrote:
> > >
> > >>I am concerned a
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 07:12 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-08-04 06:14, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> >On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 18:13 +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> >>On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 09:28 -0500, Chris wrote:
> >
> >>I am concerned about X's dependency on HAL. Years ago I was using my
> >>
On 2009-08-04 06:14, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 18:13 +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 09:28 -0500, Chris wrote:
I am concerned about X's dependency on HAL. Years ago I was using my
SGI Indy with a superb SGI Monitor and US keyboard (brackets and
braces
4 matches
Mail list logo
