On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 11:04:11PM +0100, s. keeling wrote:
> right (to your tastes)? Why spin off instead into this silly "I'm
> right and everyone else is evil!" diatribe?
It's hard to stop breathing. ;)
--
"To the extent that we overreact, we proffer the terrorists the
greatest tribu
* Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Jan 14 05:47 -0600]:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 04:56:09PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > * Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Jan 13 14:58 -0600]:
> >
> > >> This is a waste of time.
> > >
> > > Am I the only one who's noticed that Schilling's mail/n
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 01/13/08 14:09, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> > This is a waste of time.
>
> Am I the only one who's noticed that Schilling's mail/news reader
> doesn't thread?
I thought that was just yet another of his quirky habits. It explains
why he loses attributions to
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 04:56:09PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Jan 13 14:58 -0600]:
>
> >> This is a waste of time.
> >
> > Am I the only one who's noticed that Schilling's mail/news reader
> > doesn't thread?
>
> Mutt has been keeping his posts in the
(I was unsure whether to reply privately or on the list. But since there
is apparently more than one reader who is objecting to my posting style
in this thread, I am going to explain it once publicly and would prefer
to take the discussion off-list soon.)
Sjoerd Hiemstra:
> Jochen Schulz:
>> Ro
* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Jan 13 14:58 -0600]:
>> This is a waste of time.
>
> Am I the only one who's noticed that Schilling's mail/news reader
> doesn't thread?
Mutt has been keeping his posts in the thread here.
- Nate >>
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best
Jochen Schulz:
> Ron Johnson:
> > Am I the only one who's noticed that Schilling's mail/news reader
> > doesn't thread?
>
> No, and that's the way he prefers to take part in mailing lists.
Am I the only one who dislikes this kind of gossip? It certainly does
not comply with Debian's moral standar
Ron Johnson:
>
> Am I the only one who's noticed that Schilling's mail/news reader doesn't
> thread?
No, and that's the way he prefers to take part in mailing lists. Earlier
attempts to discuss this matter have been, erm, just another waste of
time.
J.
--
Watching television is more hip than a
On 01/13/08 14:09, s. keeling wrote:
Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sometimes it is hard to stay quiet, in special if someone publishes incorrect
Oh, did I post the wrong link? Here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=wodim&archive=no&version=&dist=unstabl
s. keeling wrote:
> Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Sometimes it is hard to stay quiet, in special if someone publishes
>> incorrect
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=wodim&archive=no&version=&dist=unstable
>
>
>> claims about free software. I believe it is
Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Sometimes it is hard to stay quiet, in special if someone publishes incorrect
Oh, did I post the wrong link? Here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=wodim&archive=no&version=&dist=unstable
At the top of the page I see:
Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > The real problem is a problem caused by the fact that the people
> > > who "created" the wodim "project" don't like to cooperate in a way
> > > that results in quality. I cannot accept patches that don't fix
> > > the problems they are intended to
12 matches
Mail list logo
