On 01/09/11 22:29, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 9/1/2011 5:39 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 01/09/11 19:40, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/31/2011 12:54 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
NOTE: I got well side-tracked here - I'm don't know whether the OP's
problem is partition table type, sector size (some new d
On 9/1/2011 5:39 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 01/09/11 19:40, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/31/2011 12:54 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
NOTE: I got well side-tracked here - I'm don't know whether the OP's
problem is partition table type, sector size (some new drives use large
sectors?) or some other r
On 01/09/11 19:40, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/31/2011 12:54 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
NOTE: I got well side-tracked here - I'm don't know whether the OP's
problem is partition table type, sector size (some new drives use large
sectors?) or some other reason.
Yes, quite so. Back on topic, this
On 01/09/11 18:55, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/30/2011 4:04 PM, kuLa wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/08/11 20:54, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I would make an educated guess that entities exercising system level
change control policies probably aren't using Debian, but using
On 8/31/2011 12:54 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
NOTE: I got well side-tracked here - I'm don't know whether the OP's
problem is partition table type, sector size (some new drives use large
sectors?) or some other reason.
Yes, quite so. Back on topic, this Red Hat bugzilla entry from May 2009
is
On 8/30/2011 4:04 PM, kuLa wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/08/11 20:54, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I would make an educated guess that entities exercising system level
change control policies probably aren't using Debian, but using a
commercial distro such as Red Hat or Su
On 31/08/11 20:08, Lisi wrote:
On Wednesday 31 August 2011 06:54:11 Scott Ferguson wrote:
There is no
compatibility or other reason I know of that would force one to
stay on
Lenny
KDE 3.5.10.
Actually ^^ Lisi(?) that's not a restriction - it can be be run on
Squeeze
How?
:-) :-D
Well...
On Wednesday 31 August 2011 06:54:11 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> > There is no
> > compatibility or other reason I know of that would force one to
> > stay on
> > Lenny
>
> KDE 3.5.10.
>
> Actually ^^ Lisi(?) that's not a restriction - it can be be run on
> Squeeze
How?
>
On 31/08/11 05:54, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/29/2011 11:58 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 30/08/11 13:52, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/29/2011 2:50 PM, Lisi wrote:
On Monday 29 August 2011 19:32:05 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
There is no
compatibility or other reason I know of that would force one to
sta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/08/11 20:54, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> I would make an educated guess that entities exercising system level
> change control policies probably aren't using Debian, but using a
> commercial distro such as Red Hat or SuSE.
well guess again Stan :-)
10 matches
Mail list logo
