On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 10:25 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> The kernel this guy, ed00m[*1.], is offering has *nothing* to do with
> Phoronix *or* Debian. The references to Debian and Phoronix are
> deliberately deceptive, especially in the context (posting the
> announcement to this list). Hence my
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:58:30 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 13:12 -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:29:46 +0100
> > Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 10:05 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > > > * On 2014 11 Feb 07:20 -0600, Chris Bannister wrote
On 12/02/14 03:29, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 10:05 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>> * On 2014 11 Feb 07:20 -0600, Chris Bannister wrote:
Any reason why people should *not* distrust this kernel?
>>>
>>> I was thinking the same thing. Why the rush to upgrade kernels anyway?
>>
>>
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 20:36 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> So if there's a backdoor in your kernel images, show us the code. ;-)
Source and binary could differ (not allowed, but they could differ
illegally) and even if they won't, on kernel.org the source is under
watching of a huge community, this
On 2014-02-11 07:20 +0100, Pablo Zuñiga wrote:
> We have completed the preparation of the 3.14-rc2 kernel, is cooked and
> stored in
> https://github.com/ed00m/kernel2Debian/tree/master/3.14/3.14-rc2-amd64
You might want to read the license of the Linux kernel, it states that
if you distribute b
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 13:12 -0500, Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:29:46 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 10:05 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > > * On 2014 11 Feb 07:20 -0600, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > > > Any reason why people should *not* distrust this kernel?
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:29:46 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 10:05 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > * On 2014 11 Feb 07:20 -0600, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > > Any reason why people should *not* distrust this kernel?
> > >
> > > I was thinking the same thing. Why the rush to up
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 10:05 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2014 11 Feb 07:20 -0600, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > Any reason why people should *not* distrust this kernel?
> >
> > I was thinking the same thing. Why the rush to upgrade kernels anyway?
>
> Indeed. Those needing cutting edge feat
* On 2014 11 Feb 07:20 -0600, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > Any reason why people should *not* distrust this kernel?
>
> I was thinking the same thing. Why the rush to upgrade kernels anyway?
Indeed. Those needing cutting edge features should only get the source
from a known source such as kernel.o
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 05:49:38PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 11/02/14 17:20, Pablo Zuñiga wrote:
> > Dear,
> >
> > We
>
> Plural? (not one face painter?)
>
> > have completed the preparation of the 3.14-rc2 kernel, is cooked and
> > stored in
> > https://github.com/ed00m/kernel2Debian/
On 11/02/14 17:20, Pablo Zuñiga wrote:
> Dear,
>
> We
Plural? (not one face painter?)
> have completed the preparation of the 3.14-rc2 kernel, is cooked and
> stored in
> https://github.com/ed00m/kernel2Debian/tree/master/3.14/3.14-rc2-amd64
>
> additional information
> + http://www.phoronix.
Dear,
We have completed the preparation of the 3.14-rc2 kernel, is cooked and
stored in https://github.com/ed00m/kernel2Debian/tree/master/3.14/3.14-rc2-amd64
additional information
+ http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTU5MDc
+ http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=search&q=Linux
12 matches
Mail list logo
