On Saturday 26 October 2019 14:15:28 Default User wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 03:44 wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:05:21AM -0700, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Back when all this Political Correctness silliness [...]
> >
> > I usually stop reading at this point.
> >
> >
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 03:44 wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:05:21AM -0700, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Back when all this Political Correctness silliness [...]
>
> I usually stop reading at this point.
>
> -- t
>
[ salutation censored]
Wow.
This thread sure "slid on black
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:05:21AM -0700, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
[...]
> Back when all this Political Correctness silliness [...]
I usually stop reading at this point.
-- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu Oct 24 13:48:19 2019 Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> >>> Even though in some situations "guys" is claimed to be a
>> >>> gender-neutral word, I doubt that everyone thinks of themselves
>> >>> as a "guy". And it will be polite to those people to not make
>> >>> them choose between doing that or
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
Greg Wooledge wrote:
"Sie" or "xie" or similar German-derived words just sound ridiculous
and made-up, at least to those of us who don't speak German.
Dan Ritter wrote:
We have enough German-speakers on this list to chime in as to
how
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:43:25PM +1100, David wrote:
> Hi tomas,
>
> Thanks for your message, I understand your points.
Thanks :)
[...]
> To briefly respond to other points:
>
> > flame war
>
> I'm a pacifist.
thanks, again :)
> > consider responding off-list to be less offending
>
>
Hi tomas,
Thanks for your message, I understand your points.
I am reluctant to add another message to this thread. It's not my
style, and it's not the kind of content that I want or need this list
to contain [1][2]. I've no desire for activism. I'm just an ordinary
and busy person who'd rather
Hi,
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > "Sie" or "xie" or similar German-derived words just sound ridiculous
> > and made-up, at least to those of us who don't speak German.
Dan Ritter wrote:
> We have enough German-speakers on this list to chime in as to
> how ridiculous "sie" is -- but I will note that
On 24/10/2019 07:51, David wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 15:44, Default User wrote:
Guys, [...]
Guys, thanks for the feedback. I'm not sure what I will do yet.
Hi,
I'm sure you don't intend to offend, but in future please try
to choose words that cannot accidentally be understood
as
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > >>> Even though in some situations "guys" is claimed to be a
> > >>> gender-neutral word, I doubt that everyone thinks of themselves
> > >>> as a "guy". And it will be polite to those people to not make them
> > >>> choose between doing that or feeling excluded.
> [...]
>
> >>> Even though in some situations "guys" is claimed to be a
> >>> gender-neutral word, I doubt that everyone thinks of themselves
> >>> as a "guy". And it will be polite to those people to not make them
> >>> choose between doing that or feeling excluded.
[...]
> This should be on the wiki and
On 10/24/2019 8:59 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Doug McGarrett wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/24/2019 02:51 AM, David wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 15:44, Default User
>>> wrote:
>>> Guys, [...]
Guys, thanks for the feedback. I'm not sure what I will do yet.
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm sure
Doug McGarrett wrote:
>
>
> On 10/24/2019 02:51 AM, David wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 15:44, Default User
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > Guys, [...]
> > >
> > > Guys, thanks for the feedback. I'm not sure what I will do yet.
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm sure you don't intend to offend, but in
On 10/24/2019 02:51 AM, David wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 15:44, Default User wrote:
Guys, [...]
Guys, thanks for the feedback. I'm not sure what I will do yet.
Hi,
I'm sure you don't intend to offend, but in future please try
to choose words that cannot accidentally be understood
Or all.
Have a nice day, afternoon, night.
*Sorry for poor english grammar.
Em qui, 24 de out de 2019 às 04:23, Thomas Schmitt
escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > [...] I use the formula "folks".
>
> How about "peoplers" ?
>
> "Popplers Are Peoplers Too !" - Futurama
>
>
> Have a
On 2019-10-24 08:47, Joe wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:51:30 +1100
David wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 15:44, Default User
wrote:
>
>> > > Guys, [...]
>
> Guys, thanks for the feedback. I'm not sure what I will do yet.
Hi,
I'm sure you don't intend to offend, but in future please try
to
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:23:30AM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > [...] I use the formula "folks".
>
> How about "peoplers" ?
Thanks for this one :)
I think that some diversity on approaches can only help here.
We're trying to solve a complex problem. As we
Hi,
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> [...] I use the formula "folks".
How about "peoplers" ?
"Popplers Are Peoplers Too !" - Futurama
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 08:47:22AM +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:51:30 +1100
> David wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 15:44, Default User
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> > > Guys, [...]
> > >
> > > Guys, thanks for the feedback. I'm not sure what I will do yet.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:51:30 +1100
David wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 15:44, Default User
> wrote:
> >
> >> > > Guys, [...]
> >
> > Guys, thanks for the feedback. I'm not sure what I will do yet.
>
> Hi,
> I'm sure you don't intend to offend, but in future please try
> to choose
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 15:44, Default User wrote:
>
>> > > Guys, [...]
>
> Guys, thanks for the feedback. I'm not sure what I will do yet.
Hi,
I'm sure you don't intend to offend, but in future please try
to choose words that cannot accidentally be understood
as excluding valued members of this
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019, 13:54 Thomas D Dial wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 22:02 -0400, John Covici wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 21:30:25 -0400,
> > Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> > > [1 ]
> > > [2 ]
> > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019, 6:29 PM Default User <
> > > hunguponcont...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
>
On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 22:02 -0400, John Covici wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 21:30:25 -0400,
> Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> > [1 ]
> > [2 ]
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019, 6:29 PM Default User <
> > hunguponcont...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Guys, it seems like SystemRescueCD could be on the way out.
Hi,
tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Disclaimer: I have no link or affiliation to Parrot, I just use it
> regularly.
> [1] https://parrotlinux.org/
Downloading Parrot-home-4.7_x64.iso ...
Preparer Id : LIVE-BUILD 1:20190311PARROT1;
HTTPS://DEBIAN-LIVE.ALIOTH.DEBIAN.ORG/LIVE-BUILD
They
On 23/10/2019 07:32, John Covici wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 21:30:25 -0400,
Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
[1 ]
[2 ]
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019, 6:29 PM Default User wrote:
Guys, it seems like SystemRescueCD could be on the way out. Over 6 months
since a release, and a quick glance at GitLab did
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 21:30:25 -0400,
Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> [2 ]
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019, 6:29 PM Default User wrote:
>
> Guys, it seems like SystemRescueCD could be on the way out. Over 6 months
> since a release, and a quick glance at GitLab did not seem to show any
>
Default User composed on 2019-10-22 19:29 (UTC-0400):
> Guys, it seems like SystemRescueCD could be on the way out. Over 6 months
> since a release, and a quick glance at GitLab did not seem to show any
> commits since then either (but I could be wrong).
> I have looked for a replacement utility
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019, 6:29 PM Default User
wrote:
> Guys, it seems like SystemRescueCD could be on the way out. Over 6 months
> since a release, and a quick glance at GitLab did not seem to show any
> commits since then either (but I could be wrong).
>
> I have looked for a replacement utility
Guys, it seems like SystemRescueCD could be on the way out. Over 6 months
since a release, and a quick glance at GitLab did not seem to show any
commits since then either (but I could be wrong).
I have looked for a replacement utility distribution, but just can't seem
to find anything good.
If
29 matches
Mail list logo
