2014-08-04 11:08 keltezéssel, ken írta:
> It was quite awhile ago, but I used gthumb to offload photos from my
> Nikon. I didn't like it though because the date&time of the photos were
> all changed to the date&time of the download. I much prefer to keep the
> date&time when the photo was taken.
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 05:08:38AM -0400, ken wrote:
> It was quite awhile ago, but I used gthumb to offload photos from my Nikon.
> I didn't like it though because the date&time of the photos were all changed
> to the date&time of the download. I much prefer to keep the date&time when
> the photo
On 04/08/2014, ken wrote:
> It was quite awhile ago, but I used gthumb to offload photos from my
> Nikon. I didn't like it though because the date&time of the photos were
> all changed to the date&time of the download. I much prefer to keep the
> date&time when the photo was taken. What experie
It was quite awhile ago, but I used gthumb to offload photos from my
Nikon. I didn't like it though because the date&time of the photos were
all changed to the date&time of the download. I much prefer to keep the
date&time when the photo was taken. What experience do others have?
On 08/04/2
On Sunday 03 August 2014 20:18:04 jeremy bentham wrote:
> Lisi, why is it cowardly to mount the SD card by itself?
It ducks the problems! I take one look at the complications - and take the
easy way. ;-)
Lisi
> I would
> certainly have done that, but I don't have the hardware; maybe
> I'm ab
Thanks for the replies.
I can now peruse my photos with digikam, but I am not sure what
it cost me; I suspect I'll find out when next I reboot.
Installing digikam resulted, apparently, in pulling in half of
kde--cruft to me--*and* a new initrd!
I think I've had it with apt; dpkg from now on, reg
6 matches
Mail list logo