On 20140214_124034, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 14 Feb 2014 at 15:48:43 +0400, Reco wrote:
>
> > But, given systemd insists on using its' own mount implementation, I'm
> > not sure whenever systemd honors this flag.
>
> There is no reason why it shouldn't and it does. Tested.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I wish it were true, but there is always the possibility of a bug.
It's nice to see that systemd has gotten past this problem.
Apparently not everyone in Userland is aware of option 'nofail'
(surprise, surprise!!).
If anyone wants to persue this further, I suggest that they look in
the bug tracking system of systemd. If they find a bug fix about
nofail, I would be a tiny bit disappointed. My hope is that there is
no bug fix. That would indicate that the initial implentation included
proper handling of nofail.
Up until the last week or two, I was totally uninformed on this
init-system issue. Now I'm sufficiently informed to be interested in
switching to systemd soon, but not yet. This whole kerfuffle has been
quite helpful to me.
Thanks to all contributers.
--
Paul E Condon
pecon...@mesanetworks.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140214135057.ga10...@big.lan.gnu
