On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 04:37:24 +, T o n g wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:28:07 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
>> It is better because it is less hardware-specific.
>
> Yes, that's what I meant. Thanks Stephen.
>
> Being a programmer, I feel that not hard-coding anything, and making
> things
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:14:56 -0400 (EDT), Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:28:07 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> I don't speak for Tong, but I believe I can answer that question. It is
>> better because it is less hardware-specific.
>> ...
>
> Then I'd say it's no "better" but "conve
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:28:07 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:24:34 -0400 (EDT), Camaleón wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:05:58 +, Tong wrote:
>>> To recap, either adding that ModeLine or this Virtual line work,
>>> whereas the latter is better.
>>
>> Uhm... I'm afraid n
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:24:34 -0400 (EDT), Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:05:58 +, Tong wrote:
>> To recap, either adding that ModeLine or this Virtual line work, whereas
>> the latter is better.
>
> Uhm... I'm afraid now you have to explain why "the latter is better" >;-)
I don't sp
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:05:58 +, T o n g wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:49:32 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> If it doesn't work, try explicitly specifying a "Virtual" statement
>> immediately above the "Modes" statement as follows:
>>
>>Virtual 1280 1024
>
> Yes! this works.
(...)
Doing a full quote in case somebody doesn't know how to find its
parents
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:49:32 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> /etc/X11/xorg.conf
>> http://paste.debian.net/90057/
>>
>> Worked xog log:
>> http://paste.debian.net/90058/
>>
>> Not working one:
>> http://paste.debian.n
6 matches
Mail list logo
