Brendon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> should i even bother trying to put such a low end machine to use as a
> gateway, firewall or webserver? if so would debian run on it, or should i
> look for a single floppy solution (and if so which one, where do i
look)?
See http://www.cs.ubc.ca/spider/
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 08:53:54PM +0200, Brendon wrote:
> after inserting the rootdisk i receive the following error message:
>
> [MS-DOS FS Rel. 12, FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
> [me=0xa6,sc=340,#f=194,fs=44860,fl=101811,ds=19927266,de=61894,data=19931136,se=
> 52701,ts=-14
Brendon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> or should i look for a single floppy solution (and if so which one,
> where do i look)?
Have a look at http://www.fli4l.de
My 8MB 486 is running fli4l routing to DSL. Its very easy to configure.
Ciao!
juh
--
Weg mit den grünen Bremsklötzen!
http://www.su
On Sunday 17 June 2001 10:29, you wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Brendon wrote:
> > after inserting the rootdisk i receive the following error message:
> >
> > [MS-DOS FS Rel. 12, FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
> > [me=0xa6,sc=340,#f=194,fs=44860,fl=101811,ds=19927266,de=61894,dat
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Brendon wrote:
> after inserting the rootdisk i receive the following error message:
>
> [MS-DOS FS Rel. 12, FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
> [me=0xa6,sc=340,#f=194,fs=44860,fl=101811,ds=19927266,de=61894,data=19931136,se=
> 52701,ts=-1458993024,ls=2013,rc=
> I have a 486 with 8MB RAM and I allocated 32MB swap. It runs fine
> (basically just ipmasq at the moment), but I'm looking into making it
> a diskless (X)term instead.
>
I recommend at least 12MB or better 16MB for an X terminal. Remember that
you do not have the luxeairy of swap. If you have e
on Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 05:03:02PM -0400, D-Man ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 09:37:48AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> | on Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 05:57:05PM +0200, Brendon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> |
> | > ah, that's good to hear. one question though: how large should th
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 09:37:48AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
| on Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 05:57:05PM +0200, Brendon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
|
| > ah, that's good to hear. one question though: how large should the swap
| > partition be.. ? i usually use one that is slightly larger than my RAM
after inserting the rootdisk i receive the following error message:
[MS-DOS FS Rel. 12, FAT 16,check=n,conv=b,uid=0,gid=0,umask=022,bmap]
[me=0xa6,sc=340,#f=194,fs=44860,fl=101811,ds=19927266,de=61894,data=19931136,se=
52701,ts=-1458993024,ls=2013,rc=0,fc=4294967295]
Transaction block size = 512
K
on Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 05:57:05PM +0200, Brendon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> ah, that's good to hear. one question though: how large should the swap
> partition be.. ? i usually use one that is slightly larger than my RAM but
> with only 16 to begin with i'd think i'd need about 50mb swap.
Si
> > should i even bother trying to put such a low end machine to use as a
> > gateway, firewall or webserver? if so would debian run on it, or should i
> > look for a single floppy solution (and if so which one, where do i look)?
> you will be surprised to see what an old machine is capable of. I
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Brendon wrote:
> I was wondering if i should even try to do something with this machine.
> currently i have one desktop computer and one laptop, which i plan on putting
> in a network so i can use internet (via a cablemodem) on both machines.
>
> should i even bother trying
I was wondering if i should even try to do something with this machine.
currently i have one desktop computer and one laptop, which i plan on putting
in a network so i can use internet (via a cablemodem) on both machines.
should i even bother trying to put such a low end machine to use as a
gat
13 matches
Mail list logo