Subject: Re: [users] Re: oldtimer pc
Date: Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 11:03:38PM +0200
In reply to:MaD dUCK
Quoting MaD dUCK([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> also sprach Nathan E Norman (on Wed, 20 Jun 2001 03:38:47PM -0500):
> > Either kernel should be fine, though you should really
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 11:03:38PM +0200, MaD dUCK wrote:
> also sprach Nathan E Norman (on Wed, 20 Jun 2001 03:38:47PM -0500):
> > Either kernel should be fine, though you should really get more ram.
> > A router in 8 MB ican get ugly :) I've run 16 MB in my router and was
> > happier with 32 (my
also sprach Nathan E Norman (on Wed, 20 Jun 2001 03:38:47PM -0500):
> Either kernel should be fine, though you should really get more ram.
> A router in 8 MB ican get ugly :) I've run 16 MB in my router and was
> happier with 32 (my router is a 486/25 old timer with 2 3c509b :) I'm
> running 2.2.
3 matches
Mail list logo
