Re: [users] Re: oldtimer pc

2001-06-20 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: Re: [users] Re: oldtimer pc Date: Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 11:03:38PM +0200 In reply to:MaD dUCK Quoting MaD dUCK([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > also sprach Nathan E Norman (on Wed, 20 Jun 2001 03:38:47PM -0500): > > Either kernel should be fine, though you should really

Re: [users] Re: oldtimer pc

2001-06-20 Thread ktb
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 11:03:38PM +0200, MaD dUCK wrote: > also sprach Nathan E Norman (on Wed, 20 Jun 2001 03:38:47PM -0500): > > Either kernel should be fine, though you should really get more ram. > > A router in 8 MB ican get ugly :) I've run 16 MB in my router and was > > happier with 32 (my

Re: [users] Re: oldtimer pc

2001-06-20 Thread MaD dUCK
also sprach Nathan E Norman (on Wed, 20 Jun 2001 03:38:47PM -0500): > Either kernel should be fine, though you should really get more ram. > A router in 8 MB ican get ugly :) I've run 16 MB in my router and was > happier with 32 (my router is a 486/25 old timer with 2 3c509b :) I'm > running 2.2.