Re: [work around] Re: size problem of large file transfer over https

Rob Starling wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:27:27PM -0400, H.S. wrote: >> Well, I split the tar file to smaller chunks of 680M each (using the >> split command). >> $> split -d -b 680M /tmp/datafile.tar datfile > ... > > just be sure that the * expands to the names of the files in the > righ

Re: [work around] Re: size problem of large file transfer over https

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:27:27PM -0400, H.S. wrote: > Well, I split the tar file to smaller chunks of 680M each (using the > split command). > $> split -d -b 680M /tmp/datafile.tar datfile ... > The only problem is that the remote user uses Windows and will need a > method to join them together

[work around] Re: size problem of large file transfer over https

Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In , H.S. wrote: >> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >>> >>> If the Content-Length is correct, it is a problem client-side. If the >>> Content-Length is incorrect, it is a problem server-side. >> I gave it a shot myself with my own machine using Iceape browser and I >>