Re: mutt & maillist digests

ME version if it exists. On > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bash > IIRC the digest "radio button" selects only the non-MIME version. > To get the MIME one you have to go down to the section ridiculously > labelled: > > Help-bash Subscribers > (The sub

Re: mutt & maillist digests

rsion. To get the MIME one you have to go down to the section ridiculously labelled: Help-bash Subscribers (The subscribers list is only available to the list administrator.) and press: Unsubscribe or edit options Some non-MIME list digests scrub the attachments and give links to see them, which don't work. BTW I've never received a reply to any email sent to webmast...@gnu.org about any of their lists/problems. Cheers, David.

Re: mutt & maillist digests

On 2017-04-24 15:57:17 -0700, Mike McClain wrote: > I'm running Debian Wheeze on a P3 1/2M memory. Mostly CL. > Mutt 1.5.21 is the culprit ( or am I? ) > I subscribe to mailing lists in digest form. > Mutt recognizes the fact when I'm viewing a Debian User digest but not > when I'm reading a 'h

mutt & maillist digests

I'm running Debian Wheeze on a P3 1/2M memory. Mostly CL. Mutt 1.5.21 is the culprit ( or am I? ) I subscribe to mailing lists in digest form. Mutt recognizes the fact when I'm viewing a Debian User digest but not when I'm reading a 'help-bash' digest from gnu.org. The difference that's got me

(OT-Digests) Re: Unidentified subject!

On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:27:19 -0800, peasthope wrote: > * In-reply-to: <20111220205521.GJ3296@think.nuvreauspam> * References: > <171057234.68576.57886@heaviside.invalid> > <20111219184739.ge...@hysteria.proulx.com> > <171057235.49702.39796@heaviside.invalid> > <20111219222419.ga22...@h

Re: Undigesting digests (was: Number of OT Posts)

Jim Hyslop wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: >> You're supposed to undigest digests back into their component messages >> after receiving the digest > > Interesting. I didn't know that (and I suspect most people like me who > are learning to kick the Windows de

Re: Undigesting digests (was: Number of OT Posts)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Johnson wrote: > You're supposed to undigest digests back into their component messages after > receiving the digest Interesting. I didn't know that (and I suspect most people like me who are learning to kick the Windows

Debian MD5 Digests

d one built from .jigdo o net-install Beta-4 Current 2004-07-23 Current 2004-07-25 o .jigdo ... 2004-07-25 The md5 digests of all downloaded .iso files has checked out OK in each case PRIOR to burning them to CD and in each case the burne

Unsubscribe info missing from digests [was: Re: Unsubscribing (Was: Re: debian-user-digest Digest V2004 #1086)]

On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 06:26:47PM -0500, CiAsA S'Nuey Boark wrote: > On Thursday April 01 2004 03:38 pm, Paul Johnson wrote: > > What was your point? DO NOT REPLY TO DIGESTS. If your MUA or MDA > > doesn't split digests, you SHOULD NOT USE DIGESTS. You posted a > &

..use formail to split digests, was: apt-get, debian-user-digest, xfree86

On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:18:05 -0700 (PDT), tongKe Xue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > (2) I want to be able to post to debian-user, but read in digest > mode ... I started out subscribing to debian-user-digest, but then > realized I didn't know how to post, so I un

Requesting the resending of digests

stion is not why this has happened. I'm pretty sure it was my fault. My question is: Is it possible to either request that the missing digests be resent, or to download them in a format identical to that in which they were emailed? I realise that I can download the digests from FAQchest, but in

How to split Debian digests?

Is there a good tool to split debian-user digests into invidual articles? I'm currently using "formail +1 -ds" (formail is from the procmail package), but it has the following problems: * It includes the digest boundary line (a line of dashes) in each message. * It seem

Re: Digests/Newsfeed?

On Sat, 17 Jan 1998, George Bonser wrote: > It looks like the Debian lists in newsgroup format are starting to spread. We actually have linux.debian.user on our local news server, but it is very incomplete - ie. 6 messages in the last month! > If anyone is uucp capable and would like the lists a

Re: Digests/Newsfeed?

On Sat, Jan 17, 1998 at 01:11:23PM -0800, George Bonser wrote: > > FWIW, I am now sending the debian.announce and debian.changes lists to at > least one site in .au in Usenet format using uucp over tcp/ip. > > It looks like the Debian lists in newsgroup format are starting to spread. > > If anyo

Re: Digests/Newsfeed?

FWIW, I am now sending the debian.announce and debian.changes lists to at least one site in .au in Usenet format using uucp over tcp/ip. It looks like the Debian lists in newsgroup format are starting to spread. I thought that we had made the policy decision a few months ago that the Deb

Re: Digests/Newsfeed?

Hi: I happen to be a digests reader. It appears to me that a mail is sent based upon accumulated mass of bytes from the incoming messages. Currently, I am getting about 6 mails a day from debian-digest-users. -- Craig S. Stevenson - email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Searching for

Re: Converting digests to indivual mail

Hello, Here's a copy of my .procmailrc file. The only thing it does is split the debian-user digest into its compeonent messages and save them in a mailbox names Mail/debian-user. # .procmailrc # PATH=$HOME/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/ucb:/bin:/usr/local/bin:. MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail # You'd bette

Re: Converting digests to indivual mail

he digest is Some stuff in the procmail package might interest you, like "formail". This comes from its manpage: -d Tell formail that the messages it is supposed to split need not be in strict mailbox format (i.e. allows you to split digests/art

Re: Converting digests to indivual mail

Take a look at the procmailex(5) man page. Adam Klein On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 11:00:56PM -0600, Mark W. Blunier wrote: > I am subscribed to a mailing list that only sends out messages > in a digest form. I would like to convert the digest back into > individual messages. I use procmail to seper

Converting digests to indivual mail

I am subscribed to a mailing list that only sends out messages in a digest form. I would like to convert the digest back into individual messages. I use procmail to seperate out the digest from the rest of the mail. The format of the digest is Header stuff Title of digest misc info subjects in

Re: Digests

On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, ERIK STEARNS wrote: > I am new to these discussion lists and was wondering how do I set the > list mailings that I get to digest mode? send a message: to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] unsubscribe then send a message: to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] subscribe AFAIK that should do

Digests

I am new to these discussion lists and was wondering how do I set the list mailings that I get to digest mode? Thanks, Erik Stearns. -- An Open mind is the thriving of a society while the closed mind is the downfall of the same. For in Saroks's words, "The spear in the others's heart

Re: Digests

> "T" == Tommy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: T> Are the various debian lists available in digest formant? If so T> what is the procedure for setting delivery for digest. Thanks Just subscribe to debian-user-digest, etc. -- Emilio C. Lopes -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FRO

Digests

Are the various debian lists available in digest formant? If so what is the procedure for setting delivery for digest. Thanks -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

digests of the debian-user mailing list now available

A daily digest of the debian-user mailing list is now available. To switch to digests: 1. Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . The body of the message should be the word "unsubscribe". 2. Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . The body of the message should be the word

Re: Digests?

Bruce, We are currently moving the list server to another site. The move should take place in a few days - all of the pieces are working but I am still testing them. I will enable digests when that is done. Thanks Bruce

Digests?

I am very interested in following this list, but am being buried under individual messages. Is there a digest option available? Or is there an up to date archive through which I could keep track of things? Thanks! Bruce Stough