Re: biff(1)

1997-04-03 Thread Carlos Alberto Carvalho
Biff may be obsolete, but if you use X try xbuffy. It's VERY nice. I use procmail to automatically sort mail to a set of folders (currently 36), and xbuffy monitors them all continuously, showing in inverted video those who have new msgs. and the number of them. If you click on the box of the

Re: biff(1)

1997-04-03 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, If you use mailagent, then change the line in ~/.mailagent from: # Biffing support biff : OFF # Whether biff is wanted to # Biffing support biff : ON # Whether biff is wanted Then you get biff like messages, but you can configure

biff(1)

1997-04-02 Thread Tommy Lakofski
Has anyone successfully managed to get biff to work in debian? i know there's some interaction with comsat, but i never worked out where comsat got messages from (something to do with procmail? shudder). FYI, using latest unstable sendmail as MTA. Many thanks for any assistance. TL

Re: biff(1)

1997-04-02 Thread Bruce Perens
The lady who wrote biff now works here at Pixar. Biff was named after her dog (long dead). Biff set an otherwise-unused execute permission bit on your terminal device (/dev/tty??) which told comsat that you wanted to be informed about new mail. Comsat did all of the work. I think that comsat just

Re: biff(1)

1997-04-02 Thread Tommy Lakofski
Bruce, Thanks for the information. I don't suppose you'd know of anything which would perform biff's function without my reinventing a wheel? I know it's just a question of pressing 'enter' in my open bash terminal to see if i have new mail, but it'd be nice to be able to leave a terminal open

Re: biff(1)

1997-04-02 Thread Eloy A. Paris
Hi, Has anyone successfully managed to get biff to work in debian? i know there's some interaction with comsat, but i never worked out where comsat got messages from (something to do with procmail? shudder). FYI, using latest unstable sendmail as MTA. I love biff. I do not like to press