Hi,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:18:16PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:10:38 +0100, Dom wrote in message
4f8d79de.20...@rpdom.net:
On 16/04/12 21:34, Aleksandar Kostadinov wrote:
To anybody interested, debian wheezy can't run on 64MB RAM on i386.
Or actually it can
On Wednesday 18 April 2012 20:14:45 Indulekha wrote:
There is a special appeal in the challenge of keeping obsolete
machines alive, and a unique form of satifaction in not indulging
in the rampant consumerism that surrounds us too.
+1 :-)
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:10:38 +0100, Dom wrote in message
4f8d79de.20...@rpdom.net:
On 16/04/12 21:34, Aleksandar Kostadinov wrote:
To anybody interested, debian wheezy can't run on 64MB RAM on i386.
Or actually it can run but package management is unusable so all
debian benefits are
On 17/04/12 21:18, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:10:38 +0100, Dom wrote in message
4f8d79de.20...@rpdom.net:
I realise that I'm not going to be able to keep these machines
running for much longer, but I'll keep trying for as long as I can.
..do the math on power, maintenance
On Wed, April 18, 2012 10:35 am, Dom wrote:
These little machines take about 30W max, are only used for an average
of an hour a day. As for running costs? Peanuts. Heat output? Barely
noticable.
My main laptop is slightly newer and about 10x the power. I have other
systems, but nothing
Dom to...@rpdom.net wrote:
On 17/04/12 21:18, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:10:38 +0100, Dom wrote in message
4f8d79de.20...@rpdom.net:
I realise that I'm not going to be able to keep these machines
running for much longer, but I'll keep trying for as long as I can.
..do the
6 matches
Mail list logo
