Re: 2.4.23 in unstable?

2003-12-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT
quid 2.6.0-test11 ? Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 09:39:22PM -0600, Scott C. Linnenbringer wrote: On Mon, Dec 01, 2003, at 14:11 -0800, Tom wrote: I'm sure you're all reading the Slashdot article right now. Since 2.4.23 does not appear to be in unstable, should we all go out

Re: 2.4.23 in unstable?

2003-12-02 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 09:39:22PM -0600, Scott C. Linnenbringer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003, at 14:11 -0800, Tom wrote: > > > I'm sure you're all reading the Slashdot article right now. > > > > Since 2.4.23 does not appear to be in unstable, should we all go out > > and download it ourselves?

Re: 2.4.23 in unstable?

2003-12-01 Thread Scott C. Linnenbringer
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003, at 14:11 -0800, Tom wrote: > I'm sure you're all reading the Slashdot article right now. > > Since 2.4.23 does not appear to be in unstable, should we all go out > and download it ourselves? Yes. It's very simple; just compile your own kernel and package it for yourself s

2.4.23 in unstable?

2003-12-01 Thread Tom
I'm sure you're all reading the Slashdot article right now. Since 2.4.23 does not appear to be in unstable, should we all go out and download it ourselves? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]