Doofus wrote:
> My question now is: which is the better kernel build method, initrd
> where everything can be just modularised and there's not much else to
> worry about, or compiling the necessary core drivers into the kernel and
> loading other modules on-the-fly as needed (which is what I've alw
On Thursday 02 March 2006 03:41 am, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Doofus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > anoop aryal wrote:
> > >On Wednesday 01 March 2006 05:32 pm, Doofus wrote:
> > >>Hi,
> > >>
> > >>I hope someone can help me out here.
> > >>I'm finding 2.6 quite complex compared with the 2.
Do you make an initrd with your kernel? If you are using resierfile, then you
probably need one. Use mkinitrd so make it as yaird (newer stuff) will often
not work right. Otherwize, try to compile in everything you need for your
root file system. Yaird has options that will give you a good start
Doofus wrote:
Colin wrote:
Doofus wrote:
Now I'm bamboozled. If I compile a kernel using the identical .config
file that was used to compile the working and running kernel and it
won't boot properly, then my powers of fault finding dry up. I'd be
mightily grateful if anyone can give me any
On 3/2/06, Doofus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> anoop aryal wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday 01 March 2006 05:32 pm, Doofus wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I hope someone can help me out here.
> >>I'm finding 2.6 quite complex compared with the 2.4 kernels which I
> >>understood and was comfortable with.
>
Colin wrote:
Doofus wrote:
Now I'm bamboozled. If I compile a kernel using the identical .config
file that was used to compile the working and running kernel and it
won't boot properly, then my powers of fault finding dry up. I'd be
mightily grateful if anyone can give me any ideas as to whe
Doofus wrote:
> Now I'm bamboozled. If I compile a kernel using the identical .config
> file that was used to compile the working and running kernel and it
> won't boot properly, then my powers of fault finding dry up. I'd be
> mightily grateful if anyone can give me any ideas as to where the
> pro
anoop aryal wrote:
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 05:32 pm, Doofus wrote:
Hi,
I hope someone can help me out here.
I'm finding 2.6 quite complex compared with the 2.4 kernels which I
understood and was comfortable with.
I've recently installed sarge over the net and chose kernel 2.6 to
initial
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 05:32 pm, Doofus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope someone can help me out here.
> I'm finding 2.6 quite complex compared with the 2.4 kernels which I
> understood and was comfortable with.
>
> I've recently installed sarge over the net and chose kernel 2.6 to
> initially run with.
Hi,
I hope someone can help me out here.
I'm finding 2.6 quite complex compared with the 2.4 kernels which I
understood and was comfortable with.
I've recently installed sarge over the net and chose kernel 2.6 to
initially run with. Everything worked well.
I then got the 2.6 source from my de
10 matches
Mail list logo
