1. All those section mismatches! This is all over google for the release
candidates but still around as of .8. Seem not to have any effect, the thing
boots OK, but
2. Hal on startup gets an invalid op/code busy from the IDE, resets IDE
canceling DMA and other enabled functions. These can b
On 07/30/08 10:02, David Baron wrote:
1. All those section mismatches! This is all over google for the release
candidates but still around as of .8. Seem not to have any effect, the thing
boots OK, but
2. Hal on startup gets an invalid op/code busy from the IDE, resets IDE
canceling DMA
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/30/08 10:02, David Baron wrote:
1. All those section mismatches! This is all over google for the
release candidates but still around as of .8. Seem not to have any
effect, the thing boots OK, but
2. Hal on startup gets an invalid op/code busy from the IDE, resets
On 07/30/08 14:51, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/30/08 10:02, David Baron wrote:
1. All those section mismatches! This is all over google for the
release candidates but still around as of .8. Seem not to have any
effect, the thing boots OK, but
2. Hal on startup gets a
> > 1. All those section mismatches! This is all over google for the release
> > candidates but still around as of .8. Seem not to have any effect, the
> > thing boots OK, but
> >
> > 2. Hal on startup gets an invalid op/code busy from the IDE, resets IDE
> > canceling DMA and other enabled fu
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/30/08 14:51, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/30/08 10:02, David Baron wrote:
1. All those section mismatches! This is all over google for the
release candidates but still around as of .8. Seem not to have any
effect, the thing boots OK, but
2. H
Ok. I built a 2.6.26 (with the rt patch)
Has the same section mismatches as the 2.6.25
Has the same hal/ide problem as the 2.6.25
And ... that bugaboo I had a while back.
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context sirq-timer/0(6) at
kernel/rtmutex.c:743
This is from the rt patch, I su
On Thursday 31 July 2008 22:24:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Ok. I built a 2.6.26 (with the rt patch)
> >
> >
> > Has the same section mismatches as the 2.6.25
>
> I must not be compiling the same source files you are, because I
> don't get any such errors with the non-rt kernel from:
>
> 2.6.26
On Thursday 31 July 2008 23:15:38 you wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:29 PM, David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok. I built a 2.6.26 (with the rt patch)
> >
> >
> > Has the same section mismatches as the 2.6.25
> > Has the same hal/ide problem as the 2.6.25
>
> I don't know if anyone els
On 07/31/08 13:29, David Baron wrote:
Ok. I built a 2.6.26 (with the rt patch)
Has the same section mismatches as the 2.6.25
I must not be compiling the same source files you are, because I
don't get any such errors with the non-rt kernel from:
2.6.26-1~experimental.1~snapshot.11917
Has
Any one had problems with this?
Hal startup finds bad opcode, "busy" and resets IDE killing DMA, 32-bit
access, etc. All this can be restored using hdparm afterwards.
However, this may be causing other errors on the HD as well.
No problems with 2.6.23
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
On Thursday 24 July 2008 17:21:56 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Any one had problems with this?
> >
> > Hal startup finds bad opcode, "busy" and resets IDE killing DMA, 32-bit
> > access, etc. All this can be restored using hdparm afterwards.
> >
> > However, this may be causing other errors on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/24/08 00:22, David Baron wrote:
> Any one had problems with this?
>
> Hal startup finds bad opcode, "busy" and resets IDE killing DMA, 32-bit
> access, etc. All this can be restored using hdparm afterwards.
>
> However, this may be causing oth
13 matches
Mail list logo
