/cache: 121852 394664
> Swap: 498004 8728 489276
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
> Linux hm269-26876 2.2.19pre17 #1 Fri Aug 10 09:28:54 EDT 2001 i686 unknown
>
>
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I just added 512meg of ram to my Debian W
269 Hamilton Hall, CB#3210, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3210 USA
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just added 512meg of ram to my Debian Woody box. I had heard that Linux
> does not support 512meg of ram without a kernel recompile. Is this true?
>
> Wayne
on Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 10:22:59PM +1300, Adam Warner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, 2001-10-28 at 20:45, Cameron Matheson wrote:
> If this is affecting more than just myself, the Debian-user lag is
> becoming too large. I wrote a reply virtually identical to Cameron's
> about 30 minutes lat
Hi all,
I've caught up with the "test" posts. So don't reply. Let's hope the
backlog/time being taken to distribute messages is resolved (it would be
a thankless task if I didn't thank those right now working to resolve it
:-)
Regards,
Adam
On Sun, 2001-10-28 at 20:45, Cameron Matheson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 04:19:13PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I just added 512meg of ram to my Debian Woody box. I had heard that Linux
> > does not support 512meg of ram without a kernel recompile.
>I just added 512meg of ram to my Debian Woody box. I had heard that Linux
does not support 512meg of ram without a kernel recompile. Is this true?
The Debian 2.2r3 precompiled standard kernel finds 512 MB RAM just fine.
Cheers :o)
Johnny :o)
On Sun, 2001-10-28 at 10:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just added 512meg of ram to my Debian Woody box. I had heard that
Linux does not support 512meg of ram without a kernel recompile. Is
this true?
>
> Wayne
Not that I've heard. Just "cat /proc/meminfo" to see if i
said:
> I just added 512meg of ram to my Debian Woody box. I had heard
> that Linux does not support 512meg of ram without a kernel
> recompile. Is this true?
maybe true on older kernels (1.x and 2.0 ?) but not true
on 2.2 or 2.4 at least..you may have to tweak lilo to
tell linux how
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I just added 512meg of ram to my Debian Woody box. I had heard that
> Linux does not support 512meg of ram without a kernel recompile. Is
> this true?
No. You can have up to 1 gig of ram before you need to start messing
with the kernel's high mem
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 04:19:13PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just added 512meg of ram to my Debian Woody box. I had heard that Linux
> does not support 512meg of ram without a kernel recompile. Is this true?
Where did you hear this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I just added 512meg of ram to my Debian Woody box. I had heard that Linux
> does not support 512meg of ram without a kernel recompile. Is this true?
I don't know but you can find out: run free (or top or cat
/proc/meminfo or some other program
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 04:19:13PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just added 512meg of ram to my Debian Woody box. I had heard that Linux
> does not support 512meg of ram without a kernel recompile. Is this true?
No... I think you may have to recompile for ram>=1G, but that&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I just added 512meg of ram to my Debian Woody box. I had heard that Linux
> does not support 512meg of ram without a kernel recompile. Is this true?
No, it isn't. If you have more than approx. 868MB, then the all above
isn't used without a recompil
I just added 512meg of ram to my Debian Woody box. I had heard that Linux does
not support 512meg of ram without a kernel recompile. Is this true?
Wayne
14 matches
Mail list logo
