Re: 64 bit-flash failing sites (was: What to choose for Core i5 64 bits?)

2010-05-11 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:28:00 -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:48, Camaleón wrote: >> On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:26:21 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote: >> Users having problems with flash plugin on their 64 bits OS can install a 32 bits browser and run the 32 bits plugin

Re: 64 bit-flash failing sites (was: What to choose for Core i5 64 bits?)

2010-05-11 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:48, Camaleón wrote: > On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:26:21 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote: > >>> Users having problems with flash plugin on their 64 bits OS can install >>> a 32 bits browser and run the 32 bits plugin, which is annoying but it >>> should work. >>> >>> >> Does thi

Re: 64 bit-flash failing sites (was: What to choose for Core i5 64 bits?)

2010-05-11 Thread Jordan Metzmeier
> 1/ Firefox can be downloaded from Mozilla site (and Mozilla does not > provide a 64-bit version for their browser, only 32-bit binaries). Once > downloaded, no need to install anything, just click and run. Then, you > can download the flash plugin (32 bits) and store it under Firefox > plugins fo

Re: 64 bit-flash failing sites (was: What to choose for Core i5 64 bits?)

2010-05-11 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:26:21 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote: >> Users having problems with flash plugin on their 64 bits OS can install >> a 32 bits browser and run the 32 bits plugin, which is annoying but it >> should work. >> >> > Does this work natively or does it require a chroot? Natively...

Re: 64 bit-flash failing sites (was: What to choose for Core i5 64 bits?)

2010-05-11 Thread Jordan Metzmeier
> Users having problems with flash plugin on their 64 bits OS can install a > 32 bits browser and run the 32 bits plugin, which is annoying but it > should work. > Does this work natively or does it require a chroot? Sorry if this is a duplicate, I got a bounce back from the first time I attempte

Re: 64 bit-flash failing sites (was: What to choose for Core i5 64 bits?)

2010-05-11 Thread Jordan Metzmeier
> Users having problems with flash plugin on their 64 bits OS can install a > 32 bits browser and run the 32 bits plugin, which is annoying but it > should work. > Does this work natively or does it require a chroot? -- Jordan Metzmeier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.de

Re: 64 bit-flash failing sites (was: What to choose for Core i5 64 bits?)

2010-05-11 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:27:14 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Camaleón wrote: >> Any other failing site that can be tested by the mere non-US mortals? >> :-) >> >> >> > Not that I know of. Doing a google search, it looks like hulu may be the > only issue. I had p

Re: 64 bit-flash failing sites (was: What to choose for Core i5 64 bits?)

2010-05-11 Thread Jordan Metzmeier
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Camaleón wrote: > On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:06:46 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote: > >> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Camaleón wrote: >>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:56:49 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote: >>> >>> (...) >>> There are still minor issues with 64bit desk

Re: 64 bit-flash failing sites (was: What to choose for Core i5 64 bits?)

2010-05-11 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:06:46 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Camaleón wrote: >> On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:56:49 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote: >> >> (...) >> >>> There are still minor issues with 64bit desktops. For example, Adobe's >>> 64bit flash player does not f

Re: 64 bit-flash failing sites (was: What to choose for Core i5 64 bits?)

2010-05-11 Thread deloptes
Jordan Metzmeier wrote: >> -- >> Camaleón >> > > http://hulu.com is an example. AFAIK its only available to people with > U.S. IPs. > I'm in europe and it's working fine, though it said that it can not show video because of 64bit limitation on linux. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user

Re: 64 bit-flash failing sites (was: What to choose for Core i5 64 bits?)

2010-05-11 Thread Jordan Metzmeier
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Camaleón wrote: > On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:56:49 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote: > > (...) > >> There are still minor issues with 64bit desktops. For example, >> Adobe's 64bit flash player does not function on all the sites that the >> 32bit plugin will. > > First ti

64 bit-flash failing sites (was: What to choose for Core i5 64 bits?)

2010-05-11 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:56:49 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote: (...) > There are still minor issues with 64bit desktops. For example, > Adobe's 64bit flash player does not function on all the sites that the > 32bit plugin will. First time I hear such statement. Can you please provide a sample of f