On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:28:00 -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:48, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:26:21 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>>
Users having problems with flash plugin on their 64 bits OS can
install a 32 bits browser and run the 32 bits plugin
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:48, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:26:21 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>
>>> Users having problems with flash plugin on their 64 bits OS can install
>>> a 32 bits browser and run the 32 bits plugin, which is annoying but it
>>> should work.
>>>
>>>
>> Does thi
> 1/ Firefox can be downloaded from Mozilla site (and Mozilla does not
> provide a 64-bit version for their browser, only 32-bit binaries). Once
> downloaded, no need to install anything, just click and run. Then, you
> can download the flash plugin (32 bits) and store it under Firefox
> plugins fo
On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:26:21 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>> Users having problems with flash plugin on their 64 bits OS can install
>> a 32 bits browser and run the 32 bits plugin, which is annoying but it
>> should work.
>>
>>
> Does this work natively or does it require a chroot?
Natively...
> Users having problems with flash plugin on their 64 bits OS can install a
> 32 bits browser and run the 32 bits plugin, which is annoying but it
> should work.
>
Does this work natively or does it require a chroot?
Sorry if this is a duplicate, I got a bounce back from the first time
I attempte
> Users having problems with flash plugin on their 64 bits OS can install a
> 32 bits browser and run the 32 bits plugin, which is annoying but it
> should work.
>
Does this work natively or does it require a chroot?
--
Jordan Metzmeier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.de
On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:27:14 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> Any other failing site that can be tested by the mere non-US mortals?
>> :-)
>>
>>
>>
> Not that I know of. Doing a google search, it looks like hulu may be the
> only issue. I had p
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:06:46 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:56:49 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>>>
>>> (...)
>>>
There are still minor issues with 64bit desk
On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:06:46 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:56:49 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>>
>>> There are still minor issues with 64bit desktops. For example, Adobe's
>>> 64bit flash player does not f
Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>> --
>> Camaleón
>>
>
> http://hulu.com is an example. AFAIK its only available to people with
> U.S. IPs.
>
I'm in europe and it's working fine, though it said that it can not show
video because of 64bit limitation on linux.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:56:49 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>> There are still minor issues with 64bit desktops. For example,
>> Adobe's 64bit flash player does not function on all the sites that the
>> 32bit plugin will.
>
> First ti
On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:56:49 -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
(...)
> There are still minor issues with 64bit desktops. For example,
> Adobe's 64bit flash player does not function on all the sites that the
> 32bit plugin will.
First time I hear such statement.
Can you please provide a sample of f
12 matches
Mail list logo