Re: "86open" conformance of debian

1998-01-08 Thread Milan Zimmermann
Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 1998 at 09:18:09AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > See http://www.telly.org/86open/86open-faq.html: the 86open initiative is an > > initiative to standardise the C library API. > > Is that all? Binary compatibility would be super. I think commercial >

Re: "86open" conformance of debian

1998-01-07 Thread bruce
Since I'm on the 86open steering committee, Debian will probably conform. 86open progress is slow, there's nothing to conform with yet. Bruce -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Re: "86open" conformance of debian

1998-01-07 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Jan 07, 1998 at 09:18:09AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > See http://www.telly.org/86open/86open-faq.html: the 86open initiative is an > initiative to standardise the C library API. Is that all? Binary compatibility would be super. I think commercial companies would like to just target

Re: "86open" conformance of debian

1998-01-07 Thread jdassen
On Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 09:35:16PM -0500, Milan Zimmermann wrote: > I am sorry if this is off-topic for this list, but I was wondering if > Debian is already conforming to the "86open" initiative. The 86open initative (http://www.telly.org/86open/) has not released specs yet AFAIK. Given that one

"86open" conformance of debian

1998-01-07 Thread Milan Zimmermann
Hello, I am sorry if this is off-topic for this list, but I was wondering if Debian is already conforming to the "86open" initiative. (what library/libraries are being changed for the conformance?) Thank you Milan Zimmermann -- Unite for Java! - http://www.javalobby.org -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE F