Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 07, 1998 at 09:18:09AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > See http://www.telly.org/86open/86open-faq.html: the 86open initiative is an
> > initiative to standardise the C library API.
>
> Is that all? Binary compatibility would be super. I think commercial
>
Since I'm on the 86open steering committee, Debian will probably conform.
86open progress is slow, there's nothing to conform with yet.
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
On Wed, Jan 07, 1998 at 09:18:09AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> See http://www.telly.org/86open/86open-faq.html: the 86open initiative is an
> initiative to standardise the C library API.
Is that all? Binary compatibility would be super. I think commercial
companies would like to just target
On Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 09:35:16PM -0500, Milan Zimmermann wrote:
> I am sorry if this is off-topic for this list, but I was wondering if
> Debian is already conforming to the "86open" initiative.
The 86open initative (http://www.telly.org/86open/) has not released specs
yet AFAIK. Given that one
Hello,
I am sorry if this is off-topic for this list, but I was wondering if
Debian is already conforming to the "86open" initiative.
(what library/libraries are being changed for the conformance?)
Thank you
Milan Zimmermann
--
Unite for Java! - http://www.javalobby.org
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE F
5 matches
Mail list logo