Thanks, Daniel, for this helpful information.
I just discovered another similar paradox. I tried to get source package for
pidgin from backports.org. That repository
was explicitly pinned at 500 and testing at 290. But, look
main:~# apt-get source pidgin
Reading package lists... Done
Building
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 04:48:36PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Thanks, Daniel, for this helpful information.
I just discovered another similar paradox. I tried to get source package for
pidgin from backports.org. That repository
was explicitly pinned at 500
Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 04:48:36PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
Thanks, Daniel, for this helpful information.
I just discovered another similar paradox. I tried to get source package for
pidgin from backports.org. That repository
was
On 2008-07-18 19:18 +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
main:~# apt-get source pidgin/etch-backports
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
E: Unable to find a source package for pidgin/etch-backports
main:~# apt-get source pidgin=2.3.1
Reading package lists... Done
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-07-18 19:18 +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
main:~# apt-get source pidgin/etch-backports
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
E: Unable to find a source package for pidgin/etch-backports
main:~# apt-get source pidgin=2.3.1
Reading
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:09:31PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:21:59PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
main:~# apt-cache policy | grep -i backport
1 http://www.backports.org etch-backports/non-free Packages
release
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:23:25PM +0900, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Daniel... problem is that this is not well documented in visible location.
(I mean in manual page.)
I filed bug report to apt package on apt_preferences. This NotAutomatic
thing should be documented
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:19:01AM +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
Marko Randjelovic wrote:
It looks like apt have an idea backports.org has priority of 1 when there
is no entry in preferences file. Why?
Every other priorities are recognized correctly.
Also, there is no mention
On Wed,16.Jul.08, 00:03:45, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
I use backports repo for Etch and when I put it to priority 500 (explicitely
in /etc/apt/preferences), apt-get
dist-upgrade says it wants to upgrade wine. If I don't say anything, it
doesn't. Why is this happening, since default
priority
main:~# apt-cache policy | grep -i backport
1 http://www.backports.org etch-backports/non-free Packages
release o=Backports.org archive,a=etch-backports,l=Backports.org
archive,c=non-free
origin www.backports.org
1 http://www.backports.org etch-backports/contrib Packages
It looks like apt have an idea backports.org has priority of 1 when there is
no entry in preferences file. Why?
Every other priorities are recognized correctly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marko Randjelovic wrote:
It looks like apt have an idea backports.org has priority of 1 when there is
no entry in preferences file. Why?
Every other priorities are recognized correctly.
Also, there is no mention of priority=1 in /etc/apt/preferences.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:21:59PM +0200, Marko Randjelovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
main:~# apt-cache policy | grep -i backport
1 http://www.backports.org etch-backports/non-free Packages
release o=Backports.org archive,a=etch-backports,l=Backports.org
archive,c=non-free
I use backports repo for Etch and when I put it to priority 500 (explicitely in
/etc/apt/preferences), apt-get
dist-upgrade says it wants to upgrade wine. If I don't say anything, it
doesn't. Why is this happening, since default
priority should also be 500?
/etc/apt/sources.list :
14 matches
Mail list logo
