On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 11:41:18PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i wrote:
> > > Today i did an ugrade from 10.10 to 10.3
>
> Charles Curley wrote:
> > Did you mean from 10.10 to 11.3?
>
> Yes. 11.3, of course. I still have to get used to the new number.
>
> > You might try
> > removing
Hi,
i wrote:
> > Today i did an ugrade from 10.10 to 10.3
Charles Curley wrote:
> Did you mean from 10.10 to 11.3?
Yes. 11.3, of course. I still have to get used to the new number.
> You might try
> removing it (and whatever might depend on it) before you do the upgrade.
Well, the upgrade is c
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 02:25:21PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:35:41 +0200
> "Thomas Schmitt" wrote:
>
> > Today i did an ugrade from 10.10 to 10.3….
>
> Did you mean from 10.10 to 11.3? 11.3 being the current version of
> Bullseye.
>
> On that assumption, texlive seem
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:35:41 +0200
"Thomas Schmitt" wrote:
> Today i did an ugrade from 10.10 to 10.3….
Did you mean from 10.10 to 11.3? 11.3 being the current version of
Bullseye.
On that assumption, texlive seems to be optional on 11.3. You might try
removing it (and whatever might depend on
:
W: APT had planned for dpkg to do more than it reported back (3892 vs 3909).
Affected packages: texlive-latex-base:amd64 texlive-latex-extra:amd64
texlive-latex-recommended:amd64 texlive-pictures:amd64
Has the reason for this message meanwhile be found out ?
The web is full of it. But
Sven Joachim wrote:
...
> It's up to you. If the message comes up again, I would report it, but
> probably not at the first incident.
i also saw it this morning, but since this is testing and
texlive seems to get frequent changes i decided to ignore it
since i am not a heavy user of that packag
Il 29/04/20 17:36, Sven Joachim ha scritto:
Unless there are good reasons to report it, I'd say I can let it drop,
right?
It's up to you. If the message comes up again, I would report it, but
probably not at the first incident.
I think it's the first time I ever saw it in years, I'll report
On 2020-04-29 13:25 +0200, Andrea Borgia wrote:
> Hi.
>
> testing/unstable system here, just did an upgrade and I got the
> following message:
>
> W: APT had planned for dpkg to do more than it reported back (372 vs 389).
>Affected packages: texlive-latex-base:amd
Hi.
testing/unstable system here, just did an upgrade and I got the
following message:
W: APT had planned for dpkg to do more than it reported back (372 vs 389).
Affected packages: texlive-latex-base:amd64
texlive-latex-extra:amd64 texlive-latex-recommended:amd64
texlive-pictures:amd64
9 matches
Mail list logo
