Bjorn Johansson wrote:
Hello!
I previously reported that I had problems with getting
3D support working. Well, now it's working! :-)
I'm using a 2.6.0 kernel + the latest drivers from
Ati.
But I think I need to get a better graphics card, because
this isn't what I would call cool performance 8-(.
Hello!
I previously reported that I had problems with getting
3D support working. Well, now it's working! :-)
I'm using a 2.6.0 kernel + the latest drivers from
Ati.
But I think I need to get a better graphics card, because
this isn't what I would call cool performance 8-(.
Tuxracer(the commerci
Rob Sims wrote:
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 10:39 am, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
The ATI 3.7.0 driver works out of the box. The open source
DRI drivers also work great.
Does the open driver support DRI and dual heads simultaneously? DRI
doesn't work with Xinerama. The proprietary driver provides
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 the mental interface of
Rob Sims told:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2004 10:39 am, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> > The ATI 3.7.0 driver works out of the box. The open source
> > DRI drivers also work great.
>
> Does the open driver support DRI and dual heads simultaneously? DRI
> do
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 10:39 am, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> The ATI 3.7.0 driver works out of the box. The open source
> DRI drivers also work great.
Does the open driver support DRI and dual heads simultaneously? DRI
doesn't work with Xinerama. The proprietary driver provides a single
fram
Rob Sims wrote:
On Monday 05 January 2004 05:30 pm, Björn Johansson wrote:
I've recently installed a 2.6.0 kernel, and I have a problem
with the graphics in X. The problem is that I can't succesfully
recompile the fglrx driver, so the system uses MESA instead
of the graphic libraries provided by t
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 the mental interface of
Björn Johansson told:
>
> Hello!
>
> I've recently installed a 2.6.0 kernel, and I have a problem
> with the graphics in X. The problem is that I can't succesfully
> recompile the fglrx driver, so the system uses MESA instead
> of the graphic librarie
On Monday 05 January 2004 05:30 pm, Björn Johansson wrote:
> I've recently installed a 2.6.0 kernel, and I have a problem
> with the graphics in X. The problem is that I can't succesfully
> recompile the fglrx driver, so the system uses MESA instead
> of the graphic libraries provided by the offici
Björn Johansson wrote:
Hello!
I've recently installed a 2.6.0 kernel, and I have a problem
with the graphics in X. The problem is that I can't succesfully
recompile the fglrx driver, so the system uses MESA instead
of the graphic libraries provided by the official ATI package.
Is it possible to us
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:30:26AM +0100, Bj?rn Johansson wrote:
> Is it possible to use the Ati FireGL drivers with 2.6?
I don't know about this specific case, but binary drivers
usually won't work for a whole new kernel. Maybe a driver for
2.4.22 will work fine with 2.4.23, but probably not with
Hello!
I've recently installed a 2.6.0 kernel, and I have
a problem
with the graphics in X. The problem is that I can't
succesfully
recompile the fglrx
driver, so the system uses MESA instead
of the graphic
libraries provided by the official ATI package.
Is it possible to use the Ati F
11 matches
Mail list logo
