Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

On Monday 26 January 2004 6:34 pm, Michael Biebl wrote: an, > > i also own a radeon 9200 and had similar problems. What does lsmod show, > is the agpgart and radeon module loaded? Yes > When I switched to 2.6 these two modules were loaded in my case, but dri > didn't work also. > The trick was, th

Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

On Tuesday 27 January 2004 2:01 pm, Michael Biebl wrote: > hanasaki wrote: > > I have DRI working but check out my glxgears output! ... > > Hi Alan, > > I think we're getting closer ;-) > Did you check if the via_agp module was loaded without problems and You are confusing me with Hanasaki - I don

Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

LeVA wrote: [..] I have also a 9200 radeon with xfree4.3. The fact is, that the 9200 chipset is not supported by XFree4.3's 'radeon' driver. This is what I see when I try to load that driver: (...) (II) RADEON: Driver for ATI Radeon chipsets: ATI Radeon QD (AGP), (...) ATI Radeon 9000 If (AGP),

Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

2004. január 27. 15:01 dátummal Michael Biebl ezt írta: > hanasaki wrote: > > I have DRI working but check out my glxgears output! > > 1453 frames in 5.0 seconds = 290.600 FPS > > This is less than 20% of what you have! Could you help me out? > > Below is the output of lsmod > > > > thanks >

Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

hanasaki wrote: I have DRI working but check out my glxgears output! 1453 frames in 5.0 seconds = 290.600 FPS This is less than 20% of what you have! Could you help me out? Below is the output of lsmod thanks lsmod Module Size Used by radeon116332 2 [...]

Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

Alan Chandler wrote: I an trying to get my radeon 9200 based graphics to perform properly with 3D. It worked with Gentoo, but now I've switched back to Debian, I can get it to work, and I can't find out whats wrong. I am using a standard "kernel-image-2.6.0-1-k7" debian package "xserver-xfree

Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

hanasaki wrote: Below output should answer your question. It is an ATI 9000 based board from PowerColor 128MB and outputs for VGA, DVI and TV 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R250 If [Radeon 9000] (rev 01) 01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rad

Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

> On Sunday 25 January 2004 8:46 am, Peter Schönfeld wrote: > > Hi, > > > > try http://kano.mipooh.net/ there is a script called > > > > install-radeon-debian.sh, run it as root with X not running. OK took the plunge 1) It has replaced the XFree open source driver with the ati proprietary one

Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

On Sunday 25 January 2004 8:46 am, Peter Schönfeld wrote: > Hi, > > try http://kano.mipooh.net/ there is a script called > > install-radeon-debian.sh, run it as root with X not running. > Why that one, and not (for instance) install-radeon-agpgart-debian.sh Thats a pretty scary thing to do. I

Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

Hi, try http://kano.mipooh.net/ there is a script called install-radeon-debian.sh, run it as root with X not running. Peter Schoenfeld Alan Chandler wrote: > I an trying to get my radeon 9200 based graphics to perform properly with > 3D. It worked with Gentoo, but now I've switched

Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

Below output should answer your question. It is an ATI 9000 based board from PowerColor 128MB and outputs for VGA, DVI and TV 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R250 If [Radeon 9000] (rev 01) 01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R250

Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

hanasaki wrote: I have had zero success with the 3D. I was using straight sarge with its xfree4.2 and 2D acceleration. Downloaded the ATI stuff and still no luck. Same situation with my current setup, below: debian sarge kernel 2.6.1 xfree 4.3 from experimental (pinned) The x4.3 d

Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

On Saturday 24 January 2004 11:31 pm, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > Alan Chandler wrote: > > I an trying to get my radeon 9200 based graphics to perform properly with > > 3D. It worked with Gentoo, but now I've switched back to Debian, I can > > get it to work, and I can't find out whats wrong. > > [SNI

Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

I have had zero success with the 3D. I was using straight sarge with its xfree4.2 and 2D acceleration. Downloaded the ATI stuff and still no luck. Same situation with my current setup, below: debian sarge kernel 2.6.1 xfree 4.3 from experimental (pinned) The x4.3 does

Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

Alan Chandler wrote: I an trying to get my radeon 9200 based graphics to perform properly with 3D. It worked with Gentoo, but now I've switched back to Debian, I can get it to work, and I can't find out whats wrong. [SNIP] (WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available [SNIP] Are you loading the agpg

ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

I an trying to get my radeon 9200 based graphics to perform properly with 3D. It worked with Gentoo, but now I've switched back to Debian, I can get it to work, and I can't find out whats wrong. I am using a standard "kernel-image-2.6.0-1-k7" debian package "xserver-xfree" and "xlibmesa-dri"