Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-04-02 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:19:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Blacklisters may have the right to speak and *say* what they think I should > do, but they have no right to be heard. Your post only rated a 1.5 on my trollometer. Please try harder. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-04-01 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 04:00:57PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 04:02:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > You should at the very least mention why you're closing the bug report. > Did you bother to read my close message? Obviously not. I did in fact > include an explan

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-04-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 04:02:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > You should at the very least mention why you're closing the bug report. > It may, for example, be the case that user is unaware that their usual > mail system uses the DUL or whatever. Randomly closed bugreports will > just annoy people

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-04-01 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 06:32:50PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > Yes, but you have not "the right" (what loaded words!) to close the bug > reports. Feel free to ignore them, but don't close them without a better > reason. I would close such bugs if I need further information (and can't reprod

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-04-01 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:19:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Blacklisters may have the right to speak and *say* what they think I should > do, but they have no right to be heard. > > If you have the right to refuse to listen to me on my terms, I have the > right to refuse to listen to you o

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-04-01 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:19:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 09:45:35AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Of course, you could always just get the work done and email back > > to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; since it'll go through Debian the > > email will indeed arrive just fi

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-04-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 09:45:35AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:55:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I suggest you close bugs filed by such people without comment. > > Call it the Malicious Blacklist User Behavior Modification System. > > Of course, you could alw

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-03-31 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:55:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > I suggest you close bugs filed by such people without comment. > Call it the Malicious Blacklist User Behavior Modification System. Of course, you could always just get the work done and email back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; since it'l

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-03-31 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 01:50:09PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote: > If you wish to email me about any of my packages, do so from an address > which does not reject my mail as coming from a "dialup" IP. My IP is > STATIC and your ISP is run by morons who can't tell the difference, even > though I am n

ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-03-30 Thread Joseph Carter
If you wish to email me about any of my packages, do so from an address which does not reject my mail as coming from a "dialup" IP. My IP is STATIC and your ISP is run by morons who can't tell the difference, even though I am no longer listed on the DUL. I am attempting once and once only to reac