Re: Alan Cox's patches

1999-04-13 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999 18:28:52 -0400, Sean wrote: >Are the ac-kernel patches applied in order? > >For instance, if I wanted to apply patch #6, would I first have to apply >patch 1->5? No. You ONLY apply the latest patch. -- Sign the EU petition against SPAM: L I N U X .~. http://w

Re: Alan Cox's patches

1999-04-13 Thread Sean
Cool beans . . . thanx. Sean scratch wrote: > Nono, just apply patch #6, they're not sequential. Maybe make a copy of > your /usr/src/linux to /usr/src/linux.ac though. For safety. Then: > > cd /usr/src/linux.ac > patch -p1 < linuxacpatch > > That's it! > > -- nico > > -- For an idea to be fash

Re: Alan Cox's patches

1999-04-13 Thread scratch
Nono, just apply patch #6, they're not sequential. Maybe make a copy of your /usr/src/linux to /usr/src/linux.ac though. For safety. Then: cd /usr/src/linux.ac patch -p1 < linuxacpatch That's it! -- nico On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, Sean wrote: > Are the ac-kernel patches applied in order? > > For

Alan Cox's patches

1999-04-13 Thread Sean
Are the ac-kernel patches applied in order? For instance, if I wanted to apply patch #6, would I first have to apply patch 1->5? Thanx. Sean -- For an idea to be fashionable is ominous, since it must afterwards be always old-fashioned.