john doe writes:
[...]
>>
>
> You might be better off asking this on the appropriate mailing list! :)
I asked:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-May/047889.html
My impressions:
1. Scripts called by dhcp client are "BAD THING" (according to systemd
developers) - and
Dan Ritter writes:
> The package name is udhcpc.
Yes, and it's very cool. Well, poorly documented so it was a little hard
to understand. Mostly my problem was the script it wants to run for
various events and how to fix that to do the stuff I need and not do
stuff that messes up my network
On 2022-05-08 11:19:33 +0800, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> Of note: Using systemd-networkd you should not use NetworkManager or
> networking services. I think both use the ISC dhcp client
And what about NetworkManager users?
Note: it has its own internal DHCP client, but it is not robust on
buggy
On 5/8/2022 6:33 PM, Kamil Jońca wrote:
Kamil Jońca writes:
[...]
But systemd-networkd also has a huge number of configuration options
that may do what you want anyway
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.network.html
Hm. Can you create bridge without ports with
Kamil Jońca writes:
[...]
>>
>> But systemd-networkd also has a huge number of configuration options
>> that may do what you want anyway
>>
>> https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.network.html
>
> Hm. Can you create bridge without ports with systemd-networkd?
> i.e.
>
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 04:09:27PM +0200, Oliver Schoede wrote:
Alternatively there's dhcpcd5,
Be careful with this one unless you have a simple network
configuration--by default it will attempt to get addresses on all
interfaces that don't have them, not only ones you set to dhcp in
On Sun, 8 May 2022 09:20:25 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Rick Thomas [2022-05-07 19:47:57] wrote:
> > > According to the ISC webpage:
> > >> ISC has ended development on the ISC DHCP client as of early
> > >> 2022. This client implementation is no longer maintained and
>
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Rick Thomas [2022-05-07 19:47:57] wrote:
> > According to the ISC webpage:
> >> ISC has ended development on the ISC DHCP client as of early 2022.
> >> This client implementation is no longer maintained and should not be
> >> used in production any longer.
> > Can anybody
On 2022-05-08 at 07:06, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2022, at 7:47 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
>> According to the ISC webpage:
>>
>>> ISC has ended development on the ISC DHCP client as of early
>>> 2022. This client implementation is no longer maintained and
>>> should not be used in
On Sat, May 7, 2022, at 7:47 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
> According to the ISC webpage:
>
>> ISC has ended development on the ISC DHCP client as of early 2022.
>> This client implementation is no longer maintained and should not be
>> used in production any longer.
>
> Can anybody recommend a good
Jeremy Ardley writes:
> On 8/5/22 3:19 pm, Kamil Jońca wrote:
>> I cannot see if systemd-networkd can run scripts[1] after change in
>> lease. Am I missing something?
>>
> The top answer below is a partial answer to your question.
>
>
On 8/5/22 2:27 pm, Rick Thomas wrote:
Thanks!
Rick
PS: I'll also do the IPv6 part, because I'm interested in that too.
One word of caution moving away from ISC dhcp client is that any
possibility of it being started by the networking daemon will result in
very bad behaviour if you have
On 8/5/22 3:19 pm, Kamil Jońca wrote:
I cannot see if systemd-networkd can run scripts[1] after change in
lease. Am I missing something?
The top answer below is a partial answer to your question.
Jeremy Ardley writes:
[...]
>
> You can just use systemd-networkd as an IPv4 dhcp client.
I cannot see if systemd-networkd can run scripts[1] after change in
lease. Am I missing something?
KJ
[1] similar to /etc/dhcp/dhclient*hooks.d
--
http://wolnelektury.pl/wesprzyj/teraz/
On 5/8/2022 5:24 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Sat, May 7, 2022, at 8:14 PM, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 8/5/22 10:47 am, Rick Thomas wrote:
ISC has ended development on the ISC DHCP client as of early 2022.
This client implementation is no longer maintained and should not be
used in production any
On Sat, May 7, 2022, at 9:37 PM, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> On 8/5/22 11:27 am, Rick Thomas wrote:
>> Thanks for the heads up!
>> Can you describe in detail what one needs to do in order to switch over?
>> I.e. what to remove, what to install? What to configure?
>
> This is a recent blogpost of
On 8/5/22 11:27 am, Rick Thomas wrote:
Thanks for the heads up!
Can you describe in detail what one needs to do in order to switch over? I.e.
what to remove, what to install? What to configure?
This is a recent blogpost of mine showing a more complex installation
including IPv6
On Sat, May 7, 2022, at 8:19 PM, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> On 8/5/22 11:14 am, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
>>
>>
>> You can just use systemd-networkd as an IPv4 dhcp client.
>>
>>
>
> Of note: Using systemd-networkd you should not use NetworkManager or
> networking services. I think both use the ISC dhcp
On Sat, May 7, 2022, at 8:14 PM, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> On 8/5/22 10:47 am, Rick Thomas wrote:
>> ISC has ended development on the ISC DHCP client as of early 2022.
>>> This client implementation is no longer maintained and should not be
>>> used in production any longer.
>> Can anybody recommend
On 8/5/22 11:14 am, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
You can just use systemd-networkd as an IPv4 dhcp client.
Of note: Using systemd-networkd you should not use NetworkManager or
networking services. I think both use the ISC dhcp client
Of further note, I moved to systemd-networkd precisely
On 8/5/22 10:47 am, Rick Thomas wrote:
ISC has ended development on the ISC DHCP client as of early 2022.
This client implementation is no longer maintained and should not be
used in production any longer.
Can anybody recommend a good replacement?
I presently use systemd-networkd which
According to the ISC webpage:
> ISC has ended development on the ISC DHCP client as of early 2022.
> This client implementation is no longer maintained and should not be
> used in production any longer.
Can anybody recommend a good replacement?
Does anybody know what the Debian PTBs are planning
22 matches
Mail list logo
