On Tuesday 05 August 2003 07:15, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Have you tried, dare I say it, RH9, just to see if that works?
Recent releases of Red Hat will refuse to install on anything with less than
64MB of RAM (in text mode) or 128MB of RAM (in graphical mode).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:45:00PM +0800, Ladislav Bodnar wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 August 2003 07:15, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Have you tried, dare I say it, RH9, just to see if that works?
>
> Recent releases of Red Hat will refuse to install on anything with less than
> 64MB of RAM (in text mode) o
On Tuesday 05 August 2003 16:57, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > Recent releases of Red Hat will refuse to install on anything with less
> > than 64MB of RAM (in text mode) or 128MB of RAM (in graphical mode).
>
> That is not going to be a problem on a machine with 16 GB of RAM...
Oh, sorry... I'll rea
hi kourosh
i'd say try a better ( name brand ) 2GB memory stick
muskin, viking, kingston, corsair
we had similar problems with generic memory modules,
and used kingston 1GB and all the random crashes w/ 1GB memory went
away
yes, its expensive for 2GB.. but you're on the bleeding edge
o
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 17:08, Kourosh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone been able to get a Linux system, preferably Debian Woody, to
> run stably with 16GB RAM? I have someone who has a Dual Xeon proc
> system with 8GM RAM (8 x 1GB ECC registered) running Debian Woody and
> Oracle 9i with no problems.
Hi,
Has anyone been able to get a Linux system, preferably Debian Woody, to
run stably with 16GB RAM? I have someone who has a Dual Xeon proc
system with 8GM RAM (8 x 1GB ECC registered) running Debian Woody and
Oracle 9i with no problems. They would very much like to up this to
16GB (8 x 2GB EC
6 matches
Mail list logo
