Bob Proulx:
Jochen Schulz wrote:
Modern browsers appear to support that TLS extension:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Server_Name_Indication#Browser\
s
I will implement this in a test installation and get some experience
with this feature. The future looks brighter!
The
In another thread:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
... Apache (from upstream) has supported it for a while and I've had
it in production (system based on Ubuntu Maverick) for a number of
months.
Re: NameVirtualHost *:443
This is good to hear but if so then how do they pull that off? I
thought
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 01:23:35PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
In another thread:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Is there a way to have all of the browsers use starttls
for https
...
and to be able to share virtual hosts with SSL on a single
IP address? That would be awesome! Where can I read
In 20110124202335.ga5...@hysteria.proulx.com, Bob Proulx wrote:
In another thread:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
... Apache (from upstream) has supported it for a while and I've had
it in production (system based on Ubuntu Maverick) for a number of
months.
Re: NameVirtualHost *:443
This is
Bob Proulx:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
... Apache (from upstream) has supported it for a while and I've had
it in production (system based on Ubuntu Maverick) for a number of
months.
Re: NameVirtualHost *:443
This is good to hear but if so then how do they pull that off? I
thought
In 201101241443.22084@iguanasuicide.net, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/NameBasedSSLVHostsWithSNI
I believe Lenny does actually have a recent enough version of both apache2
and libssl0.9.8, but I've not tried using SNI with Lenny's version of
Apache.
(Correcting
Jochen Schulz wrote:
The problem is/was that the TLS handshake was initiated before the
HTTP request was sent. Since only the request included the
Host-Header, the web server couldn't show a certificate for the
requested domain name. A better explanation can be found here:
7 matches
Mail list logo
