On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:24:54PM -0600, Rob VanFleet wrote:
> That's actually a common misconception. I can't believe I'm defending
> redhat, but the up2date tool has been around since 6.1, and it doesn't
> cost anything. What does cost money is priority ftp access, without
> which you'll be ha
Hi to all...
> >Are you guys sure about that? With Red Hat 7, all you do is
> >run up2date daily, and you have all the security patches.
> >I'm not sure your criticism is justified anymore.
Is it possible to install a whole RedHat with up2date or make a
dist-upgrade fro
: Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: debian-user discussion: "Debian or Linux 7???"
>>
>>Are you guys sure about that? With Red Hat 7, all you do is
>>run up2date daily, and you have all the security patches.
>>I'm not sure your criticis
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:34:51PM -0500, MaD dUCK wrote:
> also sprach Robert Cymbala (on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 05:23:01PM -0800):
> > This question comes from LULA discussion list (linux users LA). There
> > someone writes that with Red Hat 7, ``up2date'' is equivalent to
> > apt-get update/upgrade i
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, MaD dUCK wrote:
> also sprach Robert Cymbala (on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 05:23:01PM -0800):
> > This question comes from LULA discussion list (linux users LA). There
> > someone writes that with Red Hat 7, ``up2date'' is equivalent to
> > apt-get update/upgrade in terms of security
also sprach Robert Cymbala (on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 05:23:01PM -0800):
> This question comes from LULA discussion list (linux users LA). There
> someone writes that with Red Hat 7, ``up2date'' is equivalent to
> apt-get update/upgrade in terms of security patches. So, switching
> to debian doesn't ne
e: 5
> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:55:22 -0800
> From: Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: debian-user discussion: "Debian or Linux 7???"
>
>Are you guys sure about that? With Red Hat 7, all you do is
>run up2date daily, and you have all the security patche
7 matches
Mail list logo
