DB == Dirk Bonne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DB I've update from bo to hamm, and now I can't drag a window accross
DB virtual screens.
The behavour has changed upstream. Get the debian sources for the
package (fvwm2*.{dsc, diff.gz, orig.tar.gz} and unpack it with
dpkg-source -x fvwm2*.dsc
Hi,
I'm having problems connecting from a hamm box to a bo box and I can't
see the reason:
From the hamm box:
troi!joey(tty6):~ ssh -v barclay
SSH Version 1.2.20 [i486-unknown-linux], protocol version 1.5.
Standard version. Does not use RSAREF.
troi: Reading configuration data /usr/home/joey
Martin Bialasinski wrote:
DB == Dirk Bonne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DB I've update from bo to hamm, and now I can't drag a window accross
DB virtual screens.
The behavour has changed upstream. Get the debian sources for the
package (fvwm2*.{dsc, diff.gz, orig.tar.gz} and unpack
On Sun, 5 Jul 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Hi
:
: Currently I have a 386 running Debian 1.3.1 (BO) and it is running the
: 2.0.29 kernel. I was wanting to use a EtherLink III from 3 com, it is a
: 3c509b.k It has both BNC and AUI on it. It also has no jumpers. It is an
: ISA card. I was just
their configuration utility, but you only have to do it
once :)
This is exactly what I did with the _two_ 3C509b cards on my bo system.
Works fine. For the second card I added the ether parameter to lilo:
append = reboot=c ether=0,0,eth1
(reboot=c might be the default now; I don't know. Without
Hi,
I've being trying to get a Win95 machine to dialin with a IPX connecting,
but adding the settings for IPX as per the man page, causes pppd to fail,
saying that the ipx settings are invalid.
I take it this means the pppd isn't compiled with IPX support, as ipx is
enables in the kernel.
Why
, as ipx is
enables in the kernel.
Probably pppd in the Bo ppp package is not compiled with IPX support.
At least, the Bo ppp packages I used were crippled in terms of IPX,
but I don't know if a Bo update of package ppp solved this problem.
Why not? Is it enabled in the hamm one?
I don't want
Hi
Currently I have a 386 running Debian 1.3.1 (BO) and it is running the
2.0.29 kernel. I was wanting to use a EtherLink III from 3 com, it is a
3c509b.k It has both BNC and AUI on it. It also has no jumpers. It is an
ISA card. I was just wonderijng if there is a way to get that working on
teh
:15 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Eithernet Cards on bo
Hi
Currently I have a 386 running Debian 1.3.1 (BO) and it is running the
2.0.29 kernel. I was wanting to use a EtherLink III from 3 com, it is a
3c509b.k It has both BNC and AUI on it. It also has no jumpers. It is an
ISA card
Hi!
I would like to limit the possibility of mail relaying in one of my bo
boxes.
I would like to be able to use this box as a smart host for
my home machine (connected to Internet via dialup with dynamically
assigned IP :-(). The same possibility should be available for
other legal
I find a lot of small changes, logs moved from (non-existent) /var/adm, to
/var/logs,
pppd argument changes, ppp setup changes, etc..
It took a bit of fiddling to bet the system re-working.
E.g. pppd now needs a noauth argument, files have moved, etc..
Is there a list of these changes,
Do you have the libc5-dev package? I think the dl library is found
there.
Dennis
--
Dennis Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] | phone: 353.4844
Network Admin, College of Engineering, MSU | pager: 222.5875
On Sun, 21 Jun 1998, Christopher Fury wrote:
I'm trying to compile perl5.004.04 on
I'm trying to compile perl5.004.04 on my debian 1.3 system... when I
run the configure script I get a problem when it trys to link with the
dl library (libdl). libdl is in /lib... I don't see any other
packages (I did install dld, though I don't know if it's necessary,
it's not very
Isn't *bo*.deb means that they can be installed on a bo system ?
If so, why is communicator4-smotif_4.05-0bo0.11_i386.deb depends on ldso (=
1.9.7-0) ? My bo has only 1.8.10-2.
Or do I completly missed something ?
Thank you.
Script started on Sat Jun 20 01:37:21 1998
rakefet# dpkg -i
I am unable to get chatscript to log me in for a ppp connection to my ISP.
Chat doesn't seem to work and doesn't seem to be supported (I like the message
in the man pages - If it breaks you get to keep the pieces). I've given up
being able to automate the process - I'll settle for logging in
I ppp'ed for a year on bo's ppp. The ISP I worked for originally did
the same login: password: routine, now we use PAP. It DOES and CAN
work. Please let's start at the beginning and see if we can fix this.
For starters, try dpkg --purge'ing ppp and then re-installing it. This
way you get the
Hi All!
I've checked ImageMagick 3.9.1 in RedHat 5.1, and it works OK.
Probably the reason of my problem is a bug in ImageMagick = 3.8.2
The another problem is however, that I can't find any newer version
which compiles in bo. The 4.0.4 version, which I've found in hamm
distribution uses
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Wojciech Marek Zabolotny wrote:
I've checked ImageMagick 3.9.1 in RedHat 5.1, and it works OK.
Probably the reason of my problem is a bug in ImageMagick = 3.8.2
The another problem is however, that I can't find any newer version
which compiles in bo. The 4.0.4 version
I use it on a bo platform.
Look at the dependancies. debhelper on bo needs perl and fileutils
upgraded first. It is a package of scripts, so it doesn't care about libc
versions.
+--+
+ Paul Wade
Hi!
A friend of mine asked me to install Debian on his new web and
mail server. Now I am trying to decide whether I should install
bo or hamm. Bo has some pretty old packages and a later upgrade
to hamm would probably require to shut the system down for a
while. But is hamm stable enough yet
On 16 Jun 1998, Andy Spiegl wrote:
A friend of mine asked me to install Debian on his new web and
mail server. Now I am trying to decide whether I should install
bo or hamm. Bo has some pretty old packages and a later upgrade
to hamm would probably require to shut the system down
Hi All!
Does anybody used successfully the -draw command with the convert
program available in ImageMagick in bo distribution?
The only graphic primitive it accepts is circle. When I type:
convert -pen red -draw circle 5,5 10,10 image.gif im2.gif
everything works fine, but when I type
On Sun, Jun 14, 1998 at 03:48:25PM +0200, Marco Frattola wrote:
installing bo on a rex machine left me with this problem: perl won't install,
saying that subprocess post install script returned error 123 or something
like this. What's error 123 and how can I fix it? without perl, other packages
On 06/15/98 at 10:18 AM, Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Jun 14, 1998 at 03:48:25PM +0200, Marco Frattola wrote:
installing bo on a rex machine left me with this problem: perl won't
install, saying that subprocess post install script returned error
123 or something like
Hi all,
installing bo on a rex machine left me with this problem: perl won't install,
saying that subprocess post install script returned error 123 or something
like this. What's error 123 and how can I fix it? without perl, other packages
are left uninstallable.
Thank you
On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, Kendrick Myatt wrote:
I have one box that is still Debian 1.2, can I upgrade to hamm
directly, or should I go to bo first? Unfortunately this is not a
test machine, so I can't afford to have it crashed. What's the best
route for something like this?
I have simulated
Kendrick Myatt wrote:
I have one box that is still Debian 1.2, can I upgrade to hamm
directly, or should I go to bo first? Unfortunately this is not a
test machine, so I can't afford to have it crashed. What's the best
route for something like this?
My personal opinion
I have one box that is still Debian 1.2, can I upgrade to hamm
directly, or should I go to bo first? Unfortunately this is not a
test machine, so I can't afford to have it crashed. What's the best
route for something like this?
Which brings me to another question... what do I use in dselect
I have bo on CD. I'm about to install a new system. Destroying
the system and rebuilding from scratch doesn't bother me as it's my
home system.
In the lists opinion, should I go ahead and re-install bo now, or
wait for a hamm CD?
Gerald V. Livingston II
'69 Bug -- AirBall
Gerald V. Livingston lI wrote:
I have bo on CD. I'm about to install a new system. Destroying
the system and rebuilding from scratch doesn't bother me as it's my
home system.
In the lists opinion, should I go ahead and re-install bo now, or
wait for a hamm CD?
Gerald V. Livingston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.1.105 i586)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Debian Users debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: bo or hamm?
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Diagnostic: Mail coming from
Hi there.
during the weekend i upgraded my system from 1.3.1-XYZ to hamm (using the
frozen- tree on ftp.debian) with the aid of the autoup script.
Surprisingly everything went fine with no bigger problems. But when i
tried to start the menuconfig programm to compile a new kernel it failed
It looks there is some trouble with the gpm daemon. See if it is running
and
try killing it to see whether it makes any difference.
George
On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Sindelfingen Office wrote: ~
Hi there.
during the weekend i upgraded my system from 1.3.1-XYZ to hamm (using the
frozen- tree
Sindelfingen Office wrote:
Hi there.
during the weekend i upgraded my system from 1.3.1-XYZ to hamm (using the
frozen- tree on ftp.debian) with the aid of the autoup script.
Surprisingly everything went fine with no bigger problems. But when i
tried to start the menuconfig programm to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello.
This message is for users of the Debian smartlist package.
I have detected a little problem which may arise when upgrading smartlist
from bo to hamm. If you are running smartlist_3.1016 from bo, please read
the following before upgrading to hamm
Having trouble with someone's system using lprng, on bo. Jobs appear
to get accepted into the print queue, but never print to the printer.
It worked up until a day ago, when they copied everything to a new
disk with cp -ax / /mnt.
Are these permissions all correct?
bash# ls -l /dev/lp*
crw-rw
Please ignore; user did not realise that even in 1998,
printer must be plugged in to computer by way of cable.
Hamish
On Sat, May 30, 1998 at 11:41:00AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Having trouble with someone's system using lprng, on bo. Jobs appear
to get accepted into the print queue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27 May, Ed Cogburn wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody have a deb of taper 6.8.x for bo(and probably an updated
ncurses set)? Taper 6.7.x has a bug in handling tapes 2GB, which I now
have.(See previous question on st* devices) I can't upgrade
Enrique Zanardi wrote:
El método que yo recomiendo para hacer la actualización es usar el apt.
Te puedes bajar el paquete de
http://www.debian.org/~jgg/apt_0.0.15-0.1bo_i386.deb
¿Va mejor el apt que el script autoup para actualizar de libc5 a libc6?.
Saludos
Agustin Martin Domingo decía:
Enrique Zanardi wrote:
El método que yo recomiendo para hacer la actualización es usar el apt.
Te puedes bajar el paquete de
http://www.debian.org/~jgg/apt_0.0.15-0.1bo_i386.deb
¿Va mejor el apt que el script autoup para actualizar de
Jose M. Bello Dieguez wrote:
At 10:21 26/05/98 +0100, you wrote:
Arriésgate. Prácticamente no va a haber más cambios (D.m.) de aquí a que
salga la 2.0. Eso significa que estemos en deep-frozen mode. ;-)
Me gusta el riesgo, pero sensato. Lo hare ;-)
[ ...]
sé qué versión, y ésa no la
Jose M. Bello Dieguez wrote:
Pues si te arriesgas y lo consigues, avisa, por favor!!!
Ayer me tiré un buen rato intentando instalar, y nada de nada. Cada
biblioteca que bajo me pide otra nueva (o una nueva versión de las que ya
tengo), hasta llegar a un cul de sac entre dos bibliotecas
On Wed, May 27, 1998 at 11:16:27AM +0200, Juan Carlos wrote:
A mi me ocurre que cuando voy a bajarme por ejemplo libreadline2_2.1-7
(que es la que aparece en la pagina oficial de hamm en Debian), el
navegador me dice que no esta. Asi me ocurre con varios otros. ¿Quiza se
deba a los cambios que
On Wed, May 27, 1998 at 11:02:32AM +0100, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 1998 at 11:16:27AM +0200, Juan Carlos wrote:
A mi me ocurre que cuando voy a bajarme por ejemplo libreadline2_2.1-7
(que es la que aparece en la pagina oficial de hamm en Debian), el
navegador me dice que no
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Como dijo Enrique, es mas sencillo usar APT y buscar un mirror que haga
http. (En Alemania creo que hay uno, http://ftp.de.debian.org/)
Marcelo
Mmmm, la cosa es que se me hace nuevo a mi esto del APT, pero bueno, voy
a intentar hacerlo
consiguiente
careto de 'que paso???'
va asi:
$ dpkg -i apt_0.0.*bo*.deb # es decir, quieres la version de bo
$ edit /etc/apt/sources.list
aqui pones:
deb file:/donde/esta/la/raiz/de/esto frozen main contrib non-free
deb http://mirror.http.de.debian.org/path/a/debian frozen main contrib
deb ftp
Does anybody have a deb of taper 6.8.x for bo(and probably an updated
ncurses set)? Taper 6.7.x has a bug in handling tapes 2GB, which I now
have.(See previous question on st* devices) I can't upgrade to hamm
yet so that option is out.
Thanks,
Brian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
En tanto no tengas NADA que sea -dev, se puede instalar libc5 y libc6 de
hamm, y listo. Luego quizás querrías cambiar todos los paquetes en base,
pero eso es otro cuento.
Marcelo
Ok, entonces, ¿me aconsejas matarme los
On Tue, May 26, 1998 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Juan Carlos wrote:
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
En tanto no tengas NADA que sea -dev, se puede instalar libc5 y libc6 de
hamm, y listo. Luego quizás querrías cambiar todos los paquetes en base,
pero eso es otro cuento.
At 10:21 26/05/98 +0100, you wrote:
Arriésgate. Prácticamente no va a haber más cambios (D.m.) de aquí a que
salga la 2.0. Eso significa que estemos en deep-frozen mode. ;-)
Pues si te arriesgas y lo consigues, avisa, por favor!!!
Ayer me tiré un buen rato intentando instalar, y nada de nada.
Hola, bufff, hacia mucho que no entraba en la lista (¿como estan
usteds?).
Bueno, bromas aparte, se me habia ocurrido que quiza se pudiese hacer
algo para poner la libc6 en nuestras Debian 1.3.1 temporalmente hasta
que salga la 2.0 Lo digo porque ya hay mucho software interesante por
ahi que
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
No entiendo muy bien tu pregunta, pero si quieres instalar libc6 en tu
Debian 1.3.1, puedes hacerlo ya. Solamente tienes que actualizar también
libc5 a la versión que hay en hamm (posiblemente ldso también). Con esto
ya puedes ejecutar todos los programas que
.
Básicamente te va a decir que tienes que reemplazar libc-dev por libc6-dev,
pero eso quiere decir que tienes que reemplazar todos los -dev de bo por
-altdev de hamm.
En tanto no tengas NADA que sea -dev, se puede instalar libc5 y libc6 de
hamm, y listo. Luego quizás querrías cambiar todos los paquetes en
Night before last I booted my bo system and the system wanted to be
booted in single user mode. After running e2fsck there were several
hundred files in lost+found. Several things such as sendmail and ps
didn't work any more. After uninstalling several packages and
reinstalling them I
On: Fri, 22 May 1998 12:18:03 +0200 (SAT) Daniel Mashao writes:
Any help how to get my emacs and fvwm2 to work.
Please check the output of ldd 'which emacs` and ldd `which fvwm2`.
If there are both libc.so.5 and libc.so.6 shown, you need to update
some of the other libraries. If the
On Fri, May 22, 1998 at 12:18:03PM +0200, Daniel Mashao wrote:
Any help how to get my emacs and fvwm2 to work.
On Sat, May 23, 1998 at 11:49:01AM +0200, Torsten Hilbrich wrote:
On: Fri, 22 May 1998 12:18:03 +0200 (SAT) Daniel Mashao writes:
Any help how to get my emacs and fvwm2 to work.
. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I used to have problems with libc5 binaries after upgrading some packages from
bo to hamm - I solved it by installing virtually any package in the oldlibs
section of hamm. As Ray pointed out to me, I have found that the latest version
of each is necessary. (Xlib6
Hola a todos,
Preguntas, preguntas, preguntas,...
1. ¿Algún ficherillo .deb para el JDK 1.1 que funcione en BO?
(Sólo lo encontré para HAMM)
2. ¿hamm instala las libc6 y las libc5? ¿sólo las libc6?
3. ¿Instalo ya hamm (es usable)? ¿Espero un poquillo más?
Lo cierto es que
On Fri, May 22, 1998 at 09:22:45PM +0200, Antonio Vieiro Varela wrote:
Hola a todos,
Preguntas, preguntas, preguntas,...
1. ¿Algún ficherillo .deb para el JDK 1.1 que funcione en BO?
(Sólo lo encontré para HAMM)
2. ¿hamm instala las libc6 y las libc5? ¿sólo las libc6
Last night, when I booted my system it came up and asked to go
into single user mode. After running e2fsck there were several hundred
files and quite a few directories in lost+found. My dilemma is whether to
fix the system of upgrade to hamm. I have been forced to uninstall
sendmail
Liran Zvibel wrote:
...
non-free -- (I'm not sure whether I'm correct) Are packages that can not
be freely distributed, but can be used by individuals.
Packages that do not meet the Debian Social Contract Guidelines; they may
or may not be free to use, or even distribute. If a package is in
Any help how to get my emacs and fvwm2 to work.
-
/---/
Daniel J. Mashao
Electrical Engineering[EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Cape Town http://www.ee.uct.ac.za/~daniel
Rondebosch, 7700,
R. Chris Ross wrote:
Last night, when I booted my system it came up and asked to go
into single user mode. After running e2fsck there were several hundred
files and quite a few directories in lost+found. My dilemma is whether to
fix the system of upgrade to hamm. I have been
Perurena [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.29 i686)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: hamm,bo...?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Diagnostic: Mail coming from a daemon, ignored
X-Envelope
On Fri, 22 May 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
Hi:
I´m a newbie on Linux, and I´ ve seen the terms hamm, bo, stable,
non-free ... in messages about instalation, but I don´ t know which is
the difference between them. Can anyone tell me?
Thanks,
Saioa.
Hi,,
bo
Martin Schulze wrote:
reassign 22557 ftp.debian.org
thanks
Oops, I didn't know I could assign the bug to debian.org itself. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have located a bo box for use in making a security release of X for
the stable distribution. Many thanks to Harald Schueler, who came up
with the winning box. Thanks also to Brad, Gregory Dickinson, Alain
Toussaint, and Florian Hinzmann for making generous offers as well.
I feel bad
On Wed, 13 May 1998, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 1998 at 08:36:36PM +0200, Antonio Castro wrote:
No se si lo que voy a decir pueda sorprender o no.
Yo creo que en Debian se hecha de menos un documento en un lugar bien
visible donde se explique claramente lo que hay y donde
On Thu, May 14, 1998 at 07:15:43AM +0200, Antonio Castro wrote:
Pues me parece que en el caso de un documento de instalacion
debería de estar todo en formato de texto (sin perjuicio de
que exista tambien en otros formatos como html).
También está (install.txt).
Lo primero que tiene que ver
Hi folks, it's your friendly neighborhood X maintainer.
I do not have access to a bo machine on which to compile a security release
of XFree86 (3.3 plus the recent security patches for xterm and libXaw). It
is rather important that I find one.
If you have such a machine and are willing to help
Redirected.
- Forwarded message from Saioa Perurena [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Hola listeros:
Soy nueva en esto de Linux, y en las listas por las que andado siempre
aparecen hamm, bo, non-free,Se que tiene que ver con la instalacion
o distribucion pero no lo se.
Podria alguien decirme que
On Wed, 13 May 1998, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 1998 at 11:02:02AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Hola listeros:
Soy nueva en esto de Linux, y en las listas por las que andado siempre
aparecen hamm, bo, non-free,Se que tiene que ver con la instalacion
o distribucion
On Wed, May 13, 1998 at 08:36:36PM +0200, Antonio Castro wrote:
No se si lo que voy a decir pueda sorprender o no.
Yo creo que en Debian se hecha de menos un documento en un lugar bien
visible donde se explique claramente lo que hay y donde esta.
Cuales sos las modalidades de insatalación
Hello all!
A few days ago I have reported a strange problems with X server crashing
after segfault when using Lyx or Netscape. Just yesterday I've lost
a few hours of my work, after my wife asked me to find something in the
Internet, when I was writing an article. Therefore I've decided
to solve
A few days ago I have reported a strange problems with X server crashing
after segfault when using Lyx or Netscape. Just yesterday I've lost
a few hours of my work, after my wife asked me to find something in the
Internet, when I was writing an article.
unless you're using a very old version of
I am wondering, is the default kernel from 386-binary(bo) compiled with
Masquerading?
I do not know if that is my problem, but whenever I try to use the
ipfwadm command (with [hopefully] valid switches) I always get a
message ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Protocol not available
Thanks, Milan
sorry, didn't put a subject line on the first send...
Hello!
I downloaded the frozen tree at work this weekend (Lets hope that nobody
had the time to delete it already...) and I'll burn the CDs today.
I have a working bo system. The problem is that I enjoy Linux so much that
I want to make
I've stated that strange behavior of lyx 0.12.0, (which crashes the X
server (with segfault) after selecting insert-figure, and accepting any
format) is probably (?) associated with wrong version of xforms library.
Is it possible to find xforms 0.88 as debian package for bo (AFAIK
Wojciech Zabolotny wrote:
BTW. It seems very strange to me that user program, such as lyx (in fact
sometimes my Netscape 4.04 does the same, after trying to download some
perticular pages) is able to crash the Xserver. It is very inconvenient
:-) when during long simulation in Scilab and
After some experiments I have found the solution.
I'm really very amused with the result.
The lyx crashed X's after inserting the PS picture only when I've set the
screen fonts to ISO-8859-2.
I've checked the ISO-8859-2 font directories on my box and stated that
fonts.dir does not exist in some
WZ == Wojciech Zabolotny [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
WZ I've stated that strange behavior of lyx 0.12.0, (which crashes the X
WZ server (with segfault) after selecting insert-figure, and accepting any
WZ format) is probably (?) associated with wrong version of xforms library.
A few days ago,
Hello all!
I've just loaded Lyx0.12.0 sources from bo-unstable, compiled, and found
it working very good except of one weird behaviour:
Whenever I try to insert the EPS or PS graphics into my document,
lyx crashes causing the X-server to restart (I use XF86_S3 server).
Did anybody experience
I've just loaded Lyx0.12.0 sources from bo-unstable, compiled, and found
it working very good except of one weird behaviour:
Whenever I try to insert the EPS or PS graphics into my document,
lyx crashes causing the X-server to restart (I use XF86_S3 server).
Did anybody experience (and hopefully
packages exist only in hamm. Is that true, or did someone make
-+ new KDE packages for bo? If so, where can I get them?
-+
-+ I saw a bo directory on the ftp mirror. I didn't go in it (run hamm here)
-+ but I did see the dir. The pacakges are debianized too, not just in .deb
-+ form.
I saw
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael
Tempsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 29 Apr , John Wingfield wrote:
Could someone please explain to me what bo and hamm actually are?
Thanks!
Codewords for different versions of the distribution,
bo == 1.3(.1rX) (currently the stable distribution)
hamm
Mario Filipe wrote:
Does anyone have a .deb with this beast?
Have you checked bo-updates and bo-unstable?
i tryed to make this from the hamm source but it complained abot not finding
db_testdir (hints anyone?)
Install debhelper (from hamm, but it's not a libc6 package).
--
see shy jo
The paths...
-L/usr/X11R6/lib
Thanks Nils
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi
Does anyone have a .deb with this beast?
i tryed to make this from the hamm source but it complained abot not finding
db_testdir (hints anyone?)
Thanks
Mario Filipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://neptuno.sc.uevora.pt/~mjnf
-BEGIN
I've been using pppd on a bo system to connect an older 486 Windows
3.11 laptop at home into my lan. However, I can't get it to work on a
similarly configured hamm machine, and I was wondering if I'm missing
something.
The laptop is a 486/25. It's floppy drive doesn't work, or else I'd
have
Hello everybody,
another great question of mine... or two...
but i didn't find any solution.
Yesterday i tried the first time to use some Xlib functions.
I included X11/Xlib.h.
The problem is that the compiler tells me things like
undefined reference to `XOpenDisplay'
undefined reference to
for bo? If so, where can I get them?
-+
-+ I saw a bo directory on the ftp mirror. I didn't go in it (run hamm here)
-+ but I did see the dir. The pacakges are debianized too, not just in .deb
-+ form.
I saw the dir, too. However, it's empty. Maybe due to a transmission
error?
I am still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Donald Harter Jr. wrote:
I had bo installed. Then I tried to install hamm and my system became
unusable. (The hamm installs disks were the old libc version.)
I had files from hamm and bo on the system.
It is highly discouraged
I am reposting this because, I did not get any replies and I suspect
that the listserv doesn't post messages from non-subscribers.
I had bo installed. Then I tried to install hamm and my system became
unusable. (The hamm installs disks were the old libc version.)
I had files from hamm and bo
On Wed, Apr 22, 1998 at 04:22:08PM +0200, Heiko R. Selber wrote:
I heard that the new KDE Beta-4 was released. Unfortunately, it seems that
the .deb packages exist only in hamm. Is that true, or did someone make
new KDE packages for bo? If so, where can I get them?
I saw a bo directory
I had bo installed. Then I tried to install hamm and my system became
unusable. (The hamm installs disks were the old libc version.)
I had files from hamm and bo on the system. I decided to reinstall bo.
I found that there were duplicate binary files. Sometimes when I would
execute a command
Hi,
I am currently running a bo system, but want to upgrade to hamm. I
think I have read that upgrading to hamm requires special care and
involves taking special steps. I was under the impression that there
existed documentation that would explain all this, however I have searched
a debian
Mark Phillips wrote:
I am currently running a bo system, but want to upgrade to hamm. I
think I have read that upgrading to hamm requires special care and
involves taking special steps. I was under the impression that there
existed documentation that would explain all this, however I
I heard that the new KDE Beta-4 was released. Unfortunately, it seems that
the .deb packages exist only in hamm. Is that true, or did someone make
new KDE packages for bo? If so, where can I get them?
TIA,
Heiko
PS: Cetero censeo Debian-2.0 publicandam esse
I have to temporarily remove dists/bo and dists/stable. The problem
is that dists/stable is a directory instead of a symlink, and
converting a directory to a symlink will break many ftp mirror
programs. The only semi-reliable way is to remove the directory, wait
a while for all ftp sites to get
Hi,
I installed the security fix bind from bo-updates. I think this caused
nslookup to disappear.
freefall $ locate nslookup
/usr/bin/nslookup.sh
An old contents file shows:
usr/bin/nslookup net/bind
usr/bin/nslookup.sh
201 - 300 of 554 matches
Mail list logo
