* Levi Waldron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021118 15:44]:
On November 17, 2002 08:22 pm, Osamu Aoki wrote:
?How do I watch the fifo?
?
?The new IDE CD-R has BurnProof so I think that will indeed help.
Also use nice to lower nice of cdrecord (higher priority)
?$ nice --9 cdrecord
A
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 04:09:41PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
| That's Phase-II of this project... ;) I think it would be good for him to
| see that to burn his CD he can just move files via samba to the Linux
| machine and run a single command or shell script.
That's easy to do. Another
,
Mihalis.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Bill Moseley wrote:
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:29:15 -0800
From: Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OT] CD-R Requirements (or Giving Back To Windows Users)
Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:29:48 -0600 (CST)
Resent-From: [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had a PII 350MHz with both CD *and* CDR SCSI and 192MB of RAM and I
should say that the SCSI controller does the difference.
I had a P60 (yes, original Pentium) with a SCSI 4x CDR and it could
handle 4x writes without a problem unless I was really hitting the
disk
Alan Shutko wrote:
I had a PII 350MHz with both CD *and* CDR SCSI...
I had a P60 (yes, original Pentium) with a SCSI 4x CDR...
Speaking of such boasts, what's the best anyone's managed on a parallel port
(non-SCSI) CD-writer? I managed 4x _once_, and I'd be interested in knowing
if it's worth
On November 17, 2002 08:22 pm, Osamu Aoki wrote:
How do I watch the fifo?
The new IDE CD-R has BurnProof so I think that will indeed help.
Also use nice to lower nice of cdrecord (higher priority)
$ nice --9 cdrecord
A testimony:
I have a K6-2/500MHz 256MB, 32x cdrw with
On November 17, 2002 08:22 pm, Osamu Aoki wrote:
How do I watch the fifo?
The new IDE CD-R has BurnProof so I think that will indeed help.
Also use nice to lower nice of cdrecord (higher priority)
$ nice --9 cdrecord
A testimony:
I have a K6-2/500MHz 256MB, 32x cdrw with
This is a rather non-specific question:
Will CD writing quality be effected if the machine is doing other tasks?
Of course the answer is it depends, but here's what I'm considering:
A few of my Debian machines are old MS Windows hand-me-downs. I've been
offered another (they just bought a new
On Sunday 17 November 2002 02:29 pm, Bill Moseley wrote:
Hi Bill
The full answer is it depends - chipset behaviour, NIC behaviour, all those
sorts of things.
A rough back-of-the-envelope answer is:
- You can NAT fine through a P75 (or less) with 16MB.
- You can burn CDs fine with a P90 with
This one time, at band camp, Bill Moseley said:
This is a rather non-specific question:
Will CD writing quality be effected if the machine is doing other
tasks? Of course the answer is it depends, but here's what I'm
considering:
It depends (sorry, couldn't help myself) (^:
So my
Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-17 14:29:15 -0800]:
This is a rather non-specific question:
Good, then you won't mind non-specific answers? :-)
Will CD writing quality be effected if the machine is doing other tasks?
Of course the answer is it depends, but here's what I'm
* Bill Moseley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021117 14:32]:
This is a rather non-specific question:
Will CD writing quality be effected if the machine is doing other tasks?
Does the CD Burner have any buffer underrun protection? If so, you
should produce good burns on even heavily-loaded systems.
At 04:33 PM 11/17/02 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
I think Clemens said something to the effect that there is nothing
more annoying than the presence of an example. Your best bet would be
to load up this old box (actually pretty nice hardware!) you have and
burn a CD while doing other tasks and watch
* Bill Moseley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021117 16:11]:
At 04:33 PM 11/17/02 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
I think Clemens said something to the effect that there is nothing
more annoying than the presence of an example. Your best bet would be
to load up this old box (actually pretty nice hardware!)
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 04:09:41PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
At 04:33 PM 11/17/02 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
I think Clemens said something to the effect that there is nothing
more annoying than the presence of an example. Your best bet would be
to load up this old box (actually pretty nice
On Monday 19 February 2001 06:43, Hans Verschoor and Jennie Kohsiek
wrote:
Bud,
In your answer you are drifting away from what it is really about.
Jan's point is that, and I agree fully with that, it is virtually
impossible to configure and tune a Linux machine for a (relative)
newbie. The
Microsoft has the benefit of proprietary documentation on lots of
hardware because they are willing to sign Non-Disclosure Agreements
with the manufacturers. So they can make drivers that work out of the
box. Linux developers don't have that luxury. They have to reverse
engineer the
Apologies for default sig sent but moments ago.
Microsoft has the benefit of proprietary documentation on lots of
hardware because they are willing to sign Non-Disclosure Agreements
with the manufacturers. So they can make drivers that work out of the
box. Linux developers don't have that
Microsoft has the benefit of proprietary documentation on lots of
hardware because they are willing to sign Non-Disclosure Agreements
with the manufacturers. So they can make drivers that work out of the
box. Linux developers don't have that luxury. They have to reverse
engineer the
Date sent: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 17:46:07 +
From: Anthony Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject:Re: Back to Windows??
Forwarded by: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On 17 Feb 2001, Bud Rogers
On 17 Feb 2001, Bud Rogers wrote:
On Saturday 17 February 2001 10:13, Jan van Veldhuizen wrote:
Why am I pegging away with Linux? If I start the Windows Setup right
now, my system will work completely in less than 1 hour
I'm feeling 20 years in the past, when configuring all
On Saturday 17 February 2001 11:46, Anthony Campbell wrote:
Well put. But the original poster said he was using *SUSE*. Now, if
only he had been using Debian...
I have run SuSE as well as Debian. I went through the learning hurdles
Jan is talking about with Slackware. In terms if his
22 matches
Mail list logo
