El jueves, 14 de agosto de 2003, a las 18:23, Bob Proulx escribe:
So if I modify the control file such as to reduce the debhelper
version dependency then I also modify the version number.
[...]
Really any valid methodology would work. Something like this would be
fine too. As long as
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:24:56PM +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
Hi,
Looking at the list archives, I know this has been discussed before.
I am trying to backport some packages from unstable to woody. For some
of them, I get stuck into something like a dependencies loop,
El domingo, 17 de agosto de 2003, a las 02:45, Rob Weir escribe:
There's a backport of debhelper 4.1.56 available from here:
deb http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/BACKPORTS stable main
Thanks a lot. I will be trying it soon.
Make sure you check www.apt-get.org to see if someone else has
El sábado, 16 de agosto de 2003, a las 13:47, Travis Crump escribe:
Wouldn't it be a bug in the package if it build-depended on debhelper 4,
but didn't actually use any features not available in debhelper 3
I suppose that, of course it would. But filing bugs is free (as in
beer). ;)
Regards,
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 04:26:29PM +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
Mensaje escrito por Bob Proulx el 14/08/2003 1:54:
For my own backports I have been changing the debhelper version
dependency in the debian/control file to specify the woody version. I
have not backported debhelper.
Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 04:26:29PM +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
Mensaje escrito por Bob Proulx el 14/08/2003 1:54:
For my own backports I have been changing the debhelper version
dependency in the debian/control file to specify the woody version. I
have not backported
Travis Crump wrote:
Wouldn't it be a bug in the package if it build-depended on debhelper 4,
but didn't actually use any features not available in debhelper 3[in
which case it should build-depend on debhelper 3]?[and I have debhelper
4.1.52 and dh_shlibs isn't on my system...]
Everything
Mensaje escrito por Bob Proulx el 14/08/2003 1:54:
For my own backports I have been changing the debhelper version
dependency in the debian/control file to specify the woody version. I
have not backported debhelper. This process has worked pretty well so
far.
Indeed that was what I was thinking
Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
I am trying to backport some packages from unstable to woody. For some
of them, I get stuck into something like a dependencies loop,
specially debhelper.
For my own backports I have been changing the debhelper version
dependency in the debian/control file to
Hi,
Looking at the list archives, I know this has been discussed before.
I am trying to backport some packages from unstable to woody. For some
of them, I get stuck into something like a dependencies loop,
specially debhelper.
The source for debhelper 4.1.52 can be compiled, but not
10 matches
Mail list logo
