Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-21 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In 20110319235133.aa4a79ae.cele...@gmail.com, Celejar wrote: On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:50:36 -0400 shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote: about the same time as samba 4 and perl 6). As it is, I'd use nfs (add ddrd I can't figure out what ddrd is. I think they meant drbd, which is a way to keep

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-21 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:12:11 -0500 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote: In 20110319235133.aa4a79ae.cele...@gmail.com, Celejar wrote: On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:50:36 -0400 shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote: about the same time as samba 4 and perl 6). As it is, I'd use nfs

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-21 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 12:27:40 +0100 Klistvud quotati...@aliceadsl.fr wrote: Dne, 20. 03. 2011 05:23:34 je Celejar napisal(a): On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:01:27 -0400 Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote: Sshfs requires fusefs to function, syntax is the same as SSH/sftp/scp.

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-20 Thread Klistvud
Dne, 20. 03. 2011 05:23:34 je Celejar napisal(a): On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:01:27 -0400 Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote: Sshfs requires fusefs to function, syntax is the same as SSH/sftp/scp. IIUC, sshfs+fusefs must be on the system from which I'm running the sshfs command, but is

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-19 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:48:22 -0700 Todd A. Jacobs codegnome.consulting+deb...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Celejar cele...@gmail.com wrote: I want to set up a network filesystem to share files between several linux systems (Debian OpenWrt).  Judging from what I see

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-19 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:50:36 -0400 shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 17, 2011 3:10 PM, Celejar cele...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I want to set up a network filesystem to share files between several linux systems (Debian OpenWrt). Judging from what I see on the list and

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-19 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:59:38 -0400 shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote: btw, i just ran across this (looking at perlbal) but this looks related to the 'network file system' conversation. http://www.danga.com/mogilefs/ Interesting, but almost certainly not what I need: MogileFS is not:

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-19 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:15:53 -0400 shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote: ... heh, i'd think you'd go with nfs because it's drop dead simple to setup. seriously, google something like 'linux exports example' and just look at it. you should have it setup in no more than 10 minutes. now, if you

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-19 Thread Chris Brennan
Sshfs requires fusefs to function, syntax is the same as SSH/sftp/scp. -- Sent from my Droid On Mar 19, 2011 11:48 PM, Celejar cele...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:48:22 -0700 Todd A. Jacobs codegnome.consulting+deb...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Celejar

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-19 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:01:27 -0400 Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote: Sshfs requires fusefs to function, syntax is the same as SSH/sftp/scp. IIUC, sshfs+fusefs must be on the system from which I'm running the sshfs command, but is not necessary on the other one; correct me if I'm wrong.

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-19 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:19:54 -0400 Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:15 PM, shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote: heh, i'd think you'd go with nfs because it's drop dead simple to setup. seriously, google something like 'linux exports example' and just

Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-17 Thread Celejar
Hi, I want to set up a network filesystem to share files between several linux systems (Debian OpenWrt). Judging from what I see on the list and elsewhere, NFS stills seems to be the standard, but I am aware that newer options are available, e.g. Coda and OpenAFS. Since I don't need any legacy

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-17 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On 2011-03-17 14:08:29 Celejar wrote: I want to set up a network filesystem to share files between several linux systems (Debian OpenWrt). Judging from what I see on the list and elsewhere, NFS stills seems to be the standard, but I am aware that newer options are available, e.g. Coda and

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-17 Thread Chris Brennan
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Celejar cele...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I want to set up a network filesystem to share files between several linux systems (Debian OpenWrt). Judging from what I see on the list and elsewhere, NFS stills seems to be the standard, but I am aware that newer

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-17 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Celejar cele...@gmail.com wrote: I want to set up a network filesystem to share files between several linux systems (Debian OpenWrt).  Judging from what I see on the list Do you actually need all the features of a typical shared filesystem? If not, you might

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-17 Thread Celejar
[Please don't cc me; I'm subscribed.] On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:28:23 -0400 Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Celejar cele...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I want to set up a network filesystem to share files between several linux systems (Debian OpenWrt).

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-17 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:28:07 -0500 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote: On 2011-03-17 14:08:29 Celejar wrote: I want to set up a network filesystem to share files between several linux systems (Debian OpenWrt). Judging from what I see on the list and elsewhere, NFS stills

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-17 Thread shawn wilson
On Mar 17, 2011 3:10 PM, Celejar cele...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I want to set up a network filesystem to share files between several linux systems (Debian OpenWrt). Judging from what I see on the list and elsewhere, NFS stills seems to be the standard, but I am aware that newer options are

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-17 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On 2011-03-17 14:53:37 Celejar wrote: Already using Kerberos everywhere? If not, don't bother with AFS. I'm not sure about Coda, but I think it is the same situation. Would you mind elaborating a bit? Are you talking about security, authentication, encryption? Kerberos is primarily

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-17 Thread shawn wilson
On Mar 17, 2011 5:06 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote: On 2011-03-17 14:53:37 Celejar wrote: And, with a truly minimal Kerberos configuration, I don't think it would be any more secure and probably more poorly performing than an equivalent NFS. You mean '... than an

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-17 Thread shawn wilson
btw, i just ran across this (looking at perlbal) but this looks related to the 'network file system' conversation. http://www.danga.com/mogilefs/

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-17 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:05:53 -0500 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote: On 2011-03-17 14:53:37 Celejar wrote: Already using Kerberos everywhere? If not, don't bother with AFS. I'm not sure about Coda, but I think it is the same situation. Would you mind elaborating a

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-17 Thread shawn wilson
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Celejar cele...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:05:53 -0500 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote: On 2011-03-17 14:53:37 Celejar wrote: Already using Kerberos everywhere? If not, don't bother with AFS. I'm not sure about Coda,

Re: Best network filesystem for a bleeding edge, pure linux environment?

2011-03-17 Thread Chris Brennan
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:15 PM, shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote: heh, i'd think you'd go with nfs because it's drop dead simple to setup. seriously, google something like 'linux exports example' and just look at it. you should have it setup in no more than 10 minutes. now, if you have