"Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It is generally not a good idea to use LVM directly on
>> top of a disk. You always should use LVM on top of a
>> RAID-System. If you use xfs as your filesystem you can
>> even extend your partitions while they are mounted.
>
> What's your basis for
on Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:19:10AM +0200, Toens Bueker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My partitions are filling up and I need to start juggling parts of
> > my filesystem. Although some of one disk is under a volume manager
> > (LVM via EVMS), I don't wa
Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My partitions are filling up and I need to start
> juggling parts of my filesystem. Although some of one
> disk is under a volume manager (LVM via EVMS), I don't
> want to fiddle with it. Mostly this is because I don't
> want to extend the container to in
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 05:30:39PM +1000, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:42:08PM -0700, Ross Boylan said
> > Do people agree that mount --rbind is generally preferable? (I think
> > this is a well known system administration issue, but googling didn't
> > turn up much).
> >
> > Seco
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:42:08PM -0700, Ross Boylan said
> Do people agree that mount --rbind is generally preferable? (I think
> this is a well known system administration issue, but googling didn't
> turn up much).
>
> Second, if I do that, is it possible to set up these mounts via fstab?
Ye
My partitions are filling up and I need to start juggling parts of my
filesystem. Although some of one disk is under a volume manager (LVM
via EVMS), I don't want to fiddle with it. Mostly this is because I
don't want to extend the container to include a second disk, thereby
doubling my chances o
6 matches
Mail list logo
