On Sun 13 Nov 2022 at 08:24:11 (+0530), Emilia Maher wrote:
> Hello,
> I have installed NetBeans through snapd process, as explained here:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Netbeans
>
> But after installation completed, I have faced booting problem.
> Then I have removed the s
Hello,
I have installed NetBeans through snapd process, as explained here:
https://wiki.debian.org/Netbeans
But after installation completed, I have faced booting problem.
Then I have removed the snapd through terminal command as well I followed
the instructions given here:
https
Hi,
I tried to install debian via PXE.
following the doc, I install netboot.tar.gz which contains pxe file.
I configured the dhcpd.conf here is relevant part :
host 00016CB3066E{ # MAC
hardware ethernet 00:01:6C:B3:06:6E;
fixed-address172.19.6.224;
server-name
Hi,
I tried to install debian via PXE.
following the doc, I install netboot.tar.gz which contains pxe file.
I configured the dhcpd.conf here is relevant part :
host 00016CB3066E{ # MAC
hardware ethernet 00:01:6C:B3:06:6E;
fixed-address172.19.6.224;
server-name
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:53:31PM +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
Hi,
I tried to install debian via PXE.
following the doc, I install netboot.tar.gz which contains pxe file.
I configured the dhcpd.conf here is relevant part :
host 00016CB3066E{ # MAC
hardware ethernet
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:53:31PM +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
Hi,
I tried to install debian via PXE.
following the doc, I install netboot.tar.gz which contains pxe file.
I configured the dhcpd.conf here is relevant part :
host 00016CB3066E{ # MAC
hardware ethernet
On 2/20/08, Tero Mäntyvaara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Owen Townend wrote:
On 2/20/08, *Tero Mäntyvaara* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Owen Townend wrote:
On 2/20/08, *Tero Mäntyvaara* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have got motherboard that has support for four (4) SATA devices. I
have installed Debian 4.0r2 AMD64 on filesystem witch has been build
on top of LVM system. LVM is on top of software-raid1 device md0 with
two SAMSUNG SP1614C (SATA) disks. Everything works well.
But if I connect two
On 2/20/08, Tero Mäntyvaara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have got motherboard that has support for four (4) SATA devices. I
have installed Debian 4.0r2 AMD64 on filesystem witch has been build
on top of LVM system. LVM is on top of software-raid1 device md0 with
two SAMSUNG SP1614C (SATA)
Owen Townend wrote:
On 2/20/08, *Tero Mäntyvaara* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have got motherboard that has support for four (4) SATA devices. I
have installed Debian 4.0r2 AMD64 on filesystem witch has been build
on top of LVM system. LVM is on
On 2/20/08, Tero Mäntyvaara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Owen Townend wrote:
On 2/20/08, *Tero Mäntyvaara* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have got motherboard that has support for four (4) SATA devices. I
have installed Debian 4.0r2 AMD64 on
Owen Townend wrote:
On 2/20/08, *Tero Mäntyvaara* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Owen Townend wrote:
On 2/20/08, *Tero Mäntyvaara* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have installed Debian 4.0r2 AMD64 on filesystem witch has been build
on top of LVM system. LVM is on top of software-raid1 device md0 with
two SAMSUNG SP1614C disks. Disks are connected to RocketRAID 1640
SATA-controller. Everything works well.
But if I connect two other disks to
Hi folks...
The saga with the speed and booting issues with this new 64bit-AMD-dual-
core continues (for those who recall the earlier posts with a
similar/same subject line).
I eventually swapped out the 4x1gig memory modules for Kingston Units
and it is at least now booting with all 4 slots
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 08:34:00PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
However, don't all those modules in the initrd end up staying in the
kernel anyway, or do they get unloaded during boot? If they stay, and
'most' modules get added, how is that different than having a huge
monolithic
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 05:54:57PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 08:34:00PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
However, don't all those modules in the initrd end up staying in the
kernel anyway, or do they get unloaded during boot? If they stay, and
'most' modules
On Aug 3, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
I guess the problem is related to this notion of trying to compete
with
MS. If people 'buy' brand A because they like features x,y, and z,
and
brand B has the goal of gaining market share, it will tend to morph
into
a clone
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:25:15PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 05:54:57PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 08:34:00PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
However, don't all those modules in the initrd end up staying in the
kernel anyway,
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:10:25PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Miles Bader wrote:
Hmm, I didn't realize it analyzed the system when building the ramfs
contents. Maybe I could just reinstall the kernel while the new kernel
is running (or is there an official hint mechanism I could use)?
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 18:23:04 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
[...]
Yes, I know what you mean. I was using yaird to make my initrd, but it
gave some errors on the latest upgrade (and Steve Langasek, Debian
kernel maintainer suggested it is no longer maintained).
Do you mean this problem?
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 06:23:04PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:10:25PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Miles Bader wrote:
Hmm, I didn't realize it analyzed the system when building the ramfs
contents. Maybe I could just reinstall the kernel while the new kernel
is
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:35:01AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
same here. interesting. I'll have to play with that. You could
probably tighten it up even more by using the 'list' option and
putting a minimum-necessary list in /etc/initramfs-tools/modules. At
least that's how I read
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 06:40:52PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 18:23:04 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
[...]
Yes, I know what you mean. I was using yaird to make my initrd, but it
gave some errors on the latest upgrade (and Steve Langasek, Debian
kernel
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:19:36AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:35:01AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
So what is the significance of initrd size? (other than the obvious
filling up /boot issue). Is it really a problem to have most modules
in there? I can
For a long time, I used self-compiled kernels, with no problems.
Recently I installed a debian kernel package, linux-image-2.6.22-1-686
(version 2.6.22-3). [It was a tight fit -- my root partition only has
130MB on it, and the debian kernel package used up 60MB -- but it did fit
with about 4MB
Miles Bader wrote:
The problem is that with the new kernel, the system won't boot all the way.
It fails when it tries to mount the root partition, and dumps me into the
ramfs emergency shell. The error message is something generic like File
not found (sorry for the vagueness, those boot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
I think the problem is your clue that previously you had compiled into
your kernel your required modules. This may be making it difficult
for mkinitramfs to determine which modules are required. If it fails
to detect this it would build an incorrect
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 08:50:08AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
I seems like it may be related to udev because if I look in /dev, the disk
device nodes which should be there _aren't there_, even though the disk
hardware is recognized fine by the kernel.
Udev isn't running yet. The boot
Miles Bader wrote:
Hmm, I didn't realize it analyzed the system when building the ramfs
contents. Maybe I could just reinstall the kernel while the new kernel
is running (or is there an official hint mechanism I could use)?
Yes. Please try that.
[I thought it just included _every_ possible
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:05:22AM -0700, Paul Kranz wrote:
I would like help getting Loadlin to work with Linux
3.0 r6 which is using kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4 and Windows
98. Loadlin boots the vanilla version of the kernel
2.2.20 as expected, however it seems to have a problem
Hi:
I am running unstable Debian with Linux 2.6.6. kernel.
My computer is a Gateway computer with a large (160GB) disk with
SATA controller. I have Windows XP on hda1, and linux on hda2, with
partitions hda3,5,6 etc for home, usr, var, etc.
I had problems installing Linux on the hard drive
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 07:03:05PM +0100, Jan Ulrich Hasecke wrote:
I encountered a strange problem today. Suddenly my notebook stops
booting after starting klogd.
I am running 2.6.1 and unstable.
After booting into single user mode I tried to manually start
everything in rc2.d via
Hi,
I encountered a strange problem today. Suddenly my notebook stops
booting after starting klogd.
I am running 2.6.1 and unstable.
After booting into single user mode I tried to manually start
everything in rc2.d via /etc/init.d xyz start and discovered that
/etc/init.d/tpconfig hangs. In
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:57:34AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 14:58, Joachim Fahnenmueller wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:48:17AM -0500, Parfait BINI wrote:
Good morning Sir,
My name's Parfait BINI, I got a boot problem with my computer.
[snip]
Parfait BINI
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:48:17AM -0500, Parfait BINI wrote:
Good morning Sir,
My name's Parfait BINI, I got a boot problem with my computer. I had a new RAM for
playing Playstation games,when I start by Win98 iI don't have no problem but when I
start by WindowsXP it shows me an error of
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 14:58, Joachim Fahnenmueller wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:48:17AM -0500, Parfait BINI wrote:
Good morning Sir,
My name's Parfait BINI, I got a boot problem with my computer.
[snip]
Parfait BINI
Remove all that Windoze stuff and install Debian.
[Or what
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 10:57:34 -0600,
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 14:58, Joachim Fahnenmueller wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:48:17AM -0500, Parfait BINI wrote:
Good morning Sir,
My name's Parfait BINI, I got a boot problem
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 07:01:32PM +, Jess Anderson wrote:
But isn't this group moderated
No, it's not.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:57:34AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 14:58, Joachim Fahnenmueller wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:48:17AM -0500, Parfait BINI wrote:
Good morning Sir,
My name's Parfait BINI, I got a boot problem with my computer.
[snip]
Parfait BINI
Good morning Sir,
My name's Parfait BINI, I got a boot problem with my computer. I had a new RAM for playing Playstation games,when I start by Win98 iI don't have no problem but when I start by WindowsXP it shows me an error of imcompatibility. I've remove this RAM and since this day ,I no more
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:48:17 -0500 (EST)
Parfait BINI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning Sir,
My name's Parfait BINI, I got a boot problem with my computer. I had
a new RAM for playing Playstation games,when I start by Win98 iI don't
have no problem but when I start by WindowsXP it shows
David Palmer. wrote:
Perhaps you might like to try Debian?
Debian isn't arrogant at all.
ROTFL!!!
(Okay, out of context, but still, that was funny!)
:-)
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gong Yi LIAO wrote:
I had apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.1-di several hour ago,
Why did you do that?
Package: kernel-image-2.4.1-di
Description: Linux kernel binary image for the Debian installer
This package contains the Linux kernel image version 2.4.1-di,
for the experimental Debian
Hi ,gurus
I had apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.1-di several hour ago,
and I tried to boot the kernel from hda on my machine(x86)
,but I got trouble while the kernel mount root file system ,
the error:
VFS:error ,can not find root file system ,or:
I can not get root I want to scream
How should I
on Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 07:37:29PM +0100, Bolem?nyi Attila ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
HI!
I have an Abit BE6-II motherboard with HPT370UDMA/ATA 100 raid
cintroller.
When I try to install the Potato, I have a message, so I have not a hard
disk.
How can I install the Potato to my computer?
HI!
I have an Abit BE6-II motherboard with HPT370UDMA/ATA 100 raid
cintroller.
When I try to install the Potato, I have a message, so I have not a hard
disk.
How can I install the Potato to my computer? I just found a HPT366
floppy images.
Attila
Alain Birtz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I recently bought Debian 2.1 and I tried to install it on my brand new
PC.
However I was not capable to make it to the installer.
When I start from the CD-ROM, I see the boot: prompt, I hit return and
then it starts loading stuff, like a normal boot
Hi,
I recently bought Debian 2.1 and I tried to install it on my brand new PC.
However I was not capable to make it to the installer.
When I start from the CD-ROM, I see the boot: prompt, I hit return and then it starts loading stuff, like a normal boot does. However, when it arrives at the
99% chance i the kernel on the Cd is not compadible with athlon, you need
to make your own boot disk, or, if possible it would be easier to install
on a non athlon, upgrade the kernel then move the HD back to the athlon.
you need linux 2.2.13 to boot on athlon.(or newer)
nate
On Fri, 21 Jan
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 03:51:35PM -0500, Alain Birtz wrote:
Hi,
I recently bought Debian 2.1 and I tried to install it on my brand new
PC.
However I was not capable to make it to the installer.
When I start from the CD-ROM, I see the boot: prompt, I hit return and
then it starts
Hi,
I installed debian 2.0 on pc there is the strange problem:
Sometimes it boots up well. I have installed only the base system and
netwoking code (NIS and Automount)
Sometimes the boot process hangs with the following error message:
qlogicisp: PCI bios not present
eata_dma : No BIOS32
On Wed, Nov 17, 1999 at 05:25:02PM +, Suresh Kumar.R wrote:
Sometimes it boots up well. I have installed only the base system and
netwoking code (NIS and Automount)
Sometimes the boot process hangs with the following error message:
qlogicisp: PCI bios not present
eata_dma : No
-- Original Message -
From: Suresh Kumar.R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 11:25 AM
Subject: Debian 2.0 booting problem
Hi,
I installed debian 2.0 on pc there is the strange problem:
Sometimes it boots up well. I have installed only the base
I recently installed Debian from an official set, slowly the things get
better. The last changes that I managed to do ( a whole adventure for a
windows newcomer!) left me with even a connection to the internet
through wvdial. My main problem is that I have very little memory (about
1.3 gig). Any
G'day all,
I have a machine running redhat that I am about to upgrade rebuild as a
debian system.
I have been having a problem booting and was wondering if I could
find a solution to implement when I change to debian.
There are only SCSI disks
/dev/sda2 900833 735118 119175
We are trying to install Debian Linux 2.0 which we got from CHIP.
After running through the installation and when the system should boot for
the first time the following message occurs:
Loading linux.
Uncompressing Linux...
Out of memory
...System halted
(Our System has 48MB of memory)
I 've installed debian on a p 166 with windows 95 on
i split my HDD to make room for debian and i install lilo as it said in
the installation menu.when i boot from my hdd win95 strart as
default,when i press Tab to select i get 1FA: an the system waits.if i
press down arrow or Tab again it
57 matches
Mail list logo
