Re: Browser preferences/options (was Re: Strong encryption for mozilla (woody))

2001-05-10 Thread Daniel Barclay
> From: "Karsten M. Self" > ... > Biggest browser beefs: > > - Stability. Quit with the fucking crashing already. Don't lose my > stuff (this includes state). ***STABILITY IS NOT OPTIONAL*** > > - Speed. Render. Quickly. Load. Quickly. Stop. Quickly. Ties > strongl

Re: Browser preferences/options (was Re: Strong encryption for mozilla (woody))

2001-05-07 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:25:56PM -0500, Hall Stevenson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > * Karsten M. Self (kmself@ix.netcom.com) [010507 19:22]: > > > > > > If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ?? It's site is here: > > > http://galeon.sourceforge.net/. I've used it in the past and it's > > >

Re: Browser preferences/options (was Re: Strong encryption for mozilla (woody))

2001-05-07 Thread Hall Stevenson
* Karsten M. Self (kmself@ix.netcom.com) [010507 19:22]: > > > > If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ?? It's site is here: > > http://galeon.sourceforge.net/. I've used it in the past and it's > > quite nice... > > A GNOME environment is not required for galeon, though some gnome libs > ar

Re: Browser preferences/options (was Re: Strong encryption for mozilla (woody))

2001-05-07 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 06:16:19PM -0500, Rich Puhek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > "Karsten M. Self" wrote: > > > > Biggest browser beefs: > > > > - Stability. Quit with the fucking crashing already. Don't lose my > > stuff (this includes state). ***STABILITY IS NOT OPTIONAL*** > > >

Re: Browser preferences/options (was Re: Strong encryption for mozilla (woody))

2001-05-07 Thread Rich Puhek
"Karsten M. Self" wrote: > > Biggest browser beefs: > > - Stability. Quit with the fucking crashing already. Don't lose my > stuff (this includes state). ***STABILITY IS NOT OPTIONAL*** > > - Speed. Render. Quickly. Load. Quickly. Stop. Quickly. Ties > strongly to l

Browser preferences/options (was Re: Strong encryption for mozilla (woody))

2001-05-07 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:54:39AM -0400, Hall Stevenson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> Note, however, if you're shifting to the dailies, that the 0.9x > >> series is rumored to be less stable than the 0.8x line. > > > > N > > > > /me sobs > > > > > > why don't they just throw away that