Andy Smith composed on 2021-11-29 05:02 (UTC):
> What is Trinity and is it actually packaged in Debian? If not, I
> think you should be seeking help with the Trinity upstream.
It's packaged /for/ Debian
Hi Gene,
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 09:03:21PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> I have installed bullseye now, but still can't install anything fom
> trinity despite installing the keyrnig and the updatig it wth synaptic.
> What the hell is going on?
We don't know because despite being repeatedly
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:52:40 -0800
From: Gene Heskett
To: charlescur...@charlescurley.com
Subject: Re: new buster install, dvd said 11.,1 but installed 10.1
I have installed bullseye now, but still can't install anything fom
trinity despite installing the keyrnig
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 09:10:54 -0800
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Where do I start on a new buster net install? The backups are all
> from stretch. All I want is the data. So how do make /bin/tar
> usable/secure?
You should have no issue recovering Buster era amanda backups on a
Bullseye installation. I
On 11/28/21, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> Please help everyone else on the list understand how well/badly this goes.
> Precise error messages or sequences of commands you've run are really
> helpful
I've always liked script for capturing what happens on the command
line but the captured control
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 09:10:54AM -0800, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Plz excuse the foul attitude, one of seagates finest 2T drives ate its
> own lunch friday and I'm on web mail. Lost everything but I have backups
> I cannot access.
>
>
>
> apt/synaptic will not let me install any of Trinity,
On 11/28/21, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Plz excuse the foul attitude, one of seagates finest 2T drives ate its own
> lunch friday and I'm on web mail. Lost everything but I have backups I
> cannot access.
>
> apt/synaptic will not let me install any of Trinity, claims I have held
> broken packages it
Plz excuse the foul attitude, one of seagates finest 2T drives ate its own
lunch friday and I'm on web mail. Lost everything but I have backups I cannot
access.
apt/synaptic will not let me install any of Trinity, claims I have held broken
packages it refuses to name. and synaptics
On 6/5/20 6:31 PM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
On 6/4/20 11:30 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Marc Shapiro wrote:
I also don't understand why it says that it could not create temporary
files in /tmp. I am running this as root and /tmp is owned by root.
What am I missing?
/tmp (and /var/tmp/) should have
On 6/4/20 11:30 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Marc Shapiro wrote:
I also don't understand why it says that it could not create temporary
files in /tmp. I am running this as root and /tmp is owned by root.
What am I missing?
/tmp (and /var/tmp/) should have the following permissions and rights:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:30:16AM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Marc Shapiro wrote:
>
> > I also don't understand why it says that it could not create temporary
> > files in /tmp. I am running this as root and /tmp is owned by root.
> > What am I missing?
>
> /tmp (and /var/tmp/) should have
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:30:16AM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Marc Shapiro wrote:
>>> I also don't understand why it says that it could not create temporary
>>> files in /tmp. I am running this as root and /tmp is owned by root.
>>> What am I missing?
>>
>> /tmp
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:30:16AM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Marc Shapiro wrote:
>
> > I also don't understand why it says that it could not create temporary
> > files in /tmp. I am running this as root and /tmp is owned by root.
> > What am I missing?
>
> /tmp (and /var/tmp/) should have
Marc Shapiro wrote:
> I also don't understand why it says that it could not create temporary
> files in /tmp. I am running this as root and /tmp is owned by root.
> What am I missing?
/tmp (and /var/tmp/) should have the following permissions and rights:
root:root 1777/drwxrwxrwt
apt
I have just installed Buster on a spare set of partitions using
debootstrap, as documented in:
Appendix D.3 of the Installation Guide.
When I got to configuring networking, I just copied
/etc/networking/interfaces, /etc/hosts, /etc/hostname, and
/etc/resolv.conf from my Stretch
Hi Kashif,
Kashif wrote:
>
>I am trying to install a buster through PXE netbooting using UEFI boot.
>The currents setup works for BIOS correctly.
>
>I changed dhcpd config file using 'option arch' to point to correct
>filename and that bit is working as when booting with PXE, the server
>manages
Hi
I am trying to install a buster through PXE netbooting using UEFI boot.
The currents setup works for BIOS correctly.
I changed dhcpd config file using 'option arch' to point to correct
filename and that bit is working as when booting with PXE, the server
manages to download grubx64.efi.
The
On 2019-10-31, J.W. Foster wrote:
>
> So this is the issue. This is a newly built system hardware that is
> all cutting edge and I have other Linux OS as well as windows
> installed and all wo rk well. I have had a consistent issue with
> Buster crashing the system. I can only tell that it is
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:45:59 + (UTC)
"J.W. Foster" wrote:
> So this is the issue. This is a newly built system hardware that
> is all cutting edge and I have other Linux OS as well as windows
> installed and all work well. I have had a consistent issue with Buster
> crashing the system. I
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:45:59 + (UTC)
"J.W. Foster" wrote:
> The thing I am seeking is where to look for logs that indicate
> specifically what is occurring.
Try /var/log/syslog. Although if the system crashes, it may not write
the last few lines to the file, and those are likely to be what
Hi John,
Quoting J.W. Foster (2019-10-31 16:45:59)
> So this is the issue. This is a newly built system hardware that is
> all cutting edge and I have other Linux OS as well as windows
> installed and all work well. I have had a consistent issue with Buster
> crashing the system. I can only
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:08:55AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Let me suggest an alternative workflow:
>
> * Do everything from a user account, except for the (very few) actions
> that actually require elevated privileges.
Yes, of course, obviously. This is exactly what I do, and what
On Lu, 15 iul 19, 10:20:34, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> The implementation of su in stretch-and-earlier is the best of all worlds.
> You get PATH set correctly before and after, you get to keep all of your
> customized environment settings like $PAGER and $LESS, and it doesn't
> change your working
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 09:29:55AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> What's the point of preserving the environment, but resetting PATH?
It assumes you trust yourself, and that you did not intentionally
sabotage your own environment.
The changes that you, the owner and administrator of your
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 11:42:52AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 09:11:17AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Du, 14 iul 19, 00:09:09, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > Use "su -" (or "sudo -s") if you want to achieve that...
> >
> > You probably meant 'sudo -i' ;)
>
>
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019, 1:30 AM Andrei POPESCU
wrote:
>
> As I see it the new su (behaviour) clearly distinguishes between
> "preserve environment" and "don't preserve environment".
>
> What's the point of preserving the environment, but resetting PATH?
>
It comes in handy debugging scripts. Some
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 09:11:17AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 14 iul 19, 00:09:09, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > Use "su -" (or "sudo -s") if you want to achieve that...
>
> You probably meant 'sudo -i' ;)
Yep, better.
Cheers
-- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sb, 13 iul 19, 18:15:25, Curt Howland wrote:
> On Saturday 13 July 2019, Ansgar Burchardt was heard to say:
>
> | The first difference is probably the most user visible one. Doing
> | plain 'su' is a really bad idea for many reasons, so using 'su -'
> is
> | strongly recommended to
On Du, 14 iul 19, 00:09:09, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 05:23:22PM -0400, Curt Howland wrote:
> >
> > Ok, the problem is /etc/profile is not being run when the "su" command
> > is used. If I log in as root, the path is set just fine.
>
> Use "su -" (or "sudo -s") if you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Saturday 13 July 2019, Ansgar Burchardt was heard to say:
| The first difference is probably the most user visible one. Doing
| plain 'su' is a really bad idea for many reasons, so using 'su -'
is
| strongly recommended to always get a
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 05:23:22PM -0400, Curt Howland wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Saturday 13 July 2019, Curt Howland was heard to say:
> > Just installed Buster.
> >
> > I know some kinks will work out, but seriously, /sbin is not in
> > root's path by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Saturday 13 July 2019, Curt Howland was heard to say:
> Just installed Buster.
>
> I know some kinks will work out, but seriously, /sbin is not in
> root's path by default?
Ok, the problem is /etc/profile is not being run when the "su" command
Curt Howland writes:
> I know some kinks will work out, but seriously, /sbin is not in root's
> path by default?
/sbin is in root's path by default. However Debian now uses a different
implementation of `su` which no longer changes PATH by default:
+---
| - new 'su' (with no args, i.e. when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Just installed Buster.
I know some kinks will work out, but seriously, /sbin is not in root's
path by default?
- --
You may my glories and my state dispose,
But not my griefs; still am I king of those.
--- William Shakespeare, "Richard II"
On 2019-04-03, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I was going to document here the work-a-round I successfully used
> yesterday to install desired additional packages.
There's a bug report concerning this from 2014.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745381
In that thread our very own
Richard Owlett writes:
> At this point, the same cognoscenti who bemoan Linux lacking market
> penetration tell him to go read some techie manuals and perform arcane
> incantations. As true ostriches they insist the problem is "operator
> error".
This is a good way to not get any help.
--
John
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019, 8:26 AM Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> At this point, the same cognoscenti who bemoan Linux lacking market
> penetration tell him to go read some techie manuals and perform arcane
> incantations. As true ostriches they insist the problem is "operator
> error".
>
This is a
Rather than quote my original post, I'll restate the underlying problem.
In the beginning, Joe Average would obtain Debian on a set of physical
installation CDs. He boots from it. The installer does it's thing.
Later, desiring additional software, he inserts the same CD and allows
Synaptic to
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 05:33:05AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
> I was wondering about that. I've never had a clear understanding of
> when to use 1 slash and when to use 3. I assumed that in this case 1
> was acceptable because how Synaptic's error message was phrased when
> attempting
On 04/01/2019 06:11 PM, Jason wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 07:23:49AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 03/31/2019 08:55 AM, bw wrote:
In-Reply-To:
The installation, having put the DVD1 ISO on a flash drive, encountered
no problems
*HOWEVER* I need several packages [gparted, tcl, tk]
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 07:23:49AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 03/31/2019 08:55 AM, bw wrote:
> >In-Reply-To:
> >
> >
> >>The installation, having put the DVD1 ISO on a flash drive, encountered
> >>no problems
> >>
> >>
> >>*HOWEVER* I need several packages [gparted, tcl, tk] which are in
On 04/01/2019 02:51 AM, didier gaumet wrote:
Le 31/03/2019 à 15:28, Richard Owlett a écrit :
[...]
I added the line
deb "file:/media/richard/Debian testing amd64 1/debian" buster contrib
main
to the beginning of sources.list .
[...]
This is unacceptable when installation via an iso image
On 03/31/2019 08:55 AM, bw wrote:
In-Reply-To:
The installation, having put the DVD1 ISO on a flash drive, encountered
no problems
*HOWEVER* I need several packages [gparted, tcl, tk] which are in the DVD
image.
Synaptic is unable to install them:
1. sources.list refers to a
Le 31/03/2019 à 15:28, Richard Owlett a écrit :
[...]
> I added the line
>> deb "file:/media/richard/Debian testing amd64 1/debian" buster contrib
>> main
>
> to the beginning of sources.list .
[...]
> This is unacceptable when installation via an iso image on a flash drive
> is becoming more and
I wish to install Buster on a machine with essentially *NO* internet
connectivity.
I downloaded the DVD1 ISO on my primary machine [creates secondary
problem of being up against data cap].
The installation, having put the DVD1 ISO on a flash drive, encountered
no problems
*HOWEVER* I need
45 matches
Mail list logo
