[OT] C++ Book Question (Was: Re: How to improve my question in stackoverflow?)

2021-09-09 Thread Linux-Fan
William Torrez Corea writes: Book.cpp:1:10: fatal error: Set: No existe el fichero o el directorio [closed] I trying compile an example of a book. The program use three classes: Book, Customer and Library. The question is offtopic for debian-user, how did it get here? Also, how are subject

Re: [Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate

2011-03-04 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On 2011-03-04 04:30:22 Nuno Magalhães wrote: >What's the latest "official" "release"? ISO/IEC 14882:2003 Programming Languages -- C++ >C++02? C++03? It's not official, but the above specification is also called "C++03". It includes "TR1", which was library extensions on top of the first C++ st

Re: [Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate

2011-03-04 Thread Roger Leigh
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:30:22AM +, Nuno Magalhães wrote: > What's the latest "official" "release"? C++02? C++03? Currently C++03 (C++98 with TR1). C++0x is due out really soon; support for most of it is already in current and upcoming GCC releases if you add -std=c++0x. Converting my code

Re: [Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate

2011-03-04 Thread Nuno Magalhães
Hi, What's the latest "official" "release"? C++02? C++03? Has Boost been "officialized"? What about C#? I know it's not directly related, but how do you figure fits the picture? -- Mars 2 Stay! http://xkcd.com/801/ /etc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: [Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate

2011-03-04 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:46:23PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > I have the dusty book "Teach Yourself C++ 4th Ed" by Al Stevens, > from... 1995 and wonder that if I go thru it will I screw myself up > because of new language features. You will certainly find it confusing. Most, if not all, code ex

Re: [Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate

2011-03-04 Thread Doug
On 3/4/2011 3:28 AM, Kelly Clowers wrote: On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 20:46, Ron Johnson wrote: Hi, I have the dusty book "Teach Yourself C++ 4th Ed" by Al Stevens, from... 1995 and wonder that if I go thru it will I screw myself up because of new language features. I don't know much about C++, bu

Re: [Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate

2011-03-04 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 20:46, Ron Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > I have the dusty book "Teach Yourself C++ 4th Ed" by Al Stevens, from... > 1995 and wonder that if I go thru it will I screw myself up because of new > language features. I don't know much about C++, but I remember how much Mozilla said t

Re: [Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate

2011-03-03 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <4d706e9f.9050...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote: >I have the dusty book "Teach Yourself C++ 4th Ed" by Al Stevens, >from... 1995 and wonder that if I go thru it will I screw myself up >because of new language features. I would ignore C++0x for now. I'm not sure if it has been published yet, but

[Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate

2011-03-03 Thread Ron Johnson
Hi, I have the dusty book "Teach Yourself C++ 4th Ed" by Al Stevens, from... 1995 and wonder that if I go thru it will I screw myself up because of new language features. Thanks, Ron -- I prefer banana-flavored energy bars made from tofu. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lis

FW: About C/C++: Book Review - Programming the Perl DBI by Descartes

2003-12-15 Thread Sreelal Chandrasenan
Title: C/C++   -Original Message-From: John Kopp - About.com C/C++ Guide [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:56 AMTo: Sreelal ChandrasenanSubject: About C/C++: Book Review - Programming the Perl DBI by Descartes  C/C++  In

re: C++ book

1999-01-17 Thread SEGV
When you get proficient you will want Stroustrup's books, Meyers' books, and perhaps Lakos' book. Until then, pick whichever introductory book works for you. The Primer is probably good. -- SEGVhttp://www.cgocable.net/~mlepage/

Re: C++ book.

1999-01-17 Thread Steve Beitzel
t great of a teacher ... so far. the book is good to > have because it is THE WORD on the language. but i'd go elsewhere to learn... > > best of luck, > > ari > > ==> shaul writes: > > > Can you recommend a good C++ book ? How about the 3rd edit

Re: C++ book.

1999-01-17 Thread ari gold
her ... so far. the book is good to have because it is THE WORD on the language. but i'd go elsewhere to learn... best of luck, ari ==> shaul writes: > Can you recommend a good C++ book ? How about the 3rd edition of > Stroustrup's book ? Is it better then the new edition of the C++ > Primer ?

Re: C++ book.

1999-01-16 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
On Sat, Jan 16, 1999 at 00:32:39 +0200, shaul wrote: > How about the 3rd edition of Stroustrup's book ? In my opinion (mainly formed by the 2nd edition, though I've looked at the 3rd too) Stroustrup's book is bad, both for beginning, intermediate and advanced users. For beginning and intermediate

Re: C++ book.

1999-01-15 Thread Wesley Simon
shaul wrote: > > Can you recommend a good C++ book ? > How about the 3rd edition of Stroustrup's book ? Is it better then the new > edition of the C++ Primer ? > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null I use C++: How to program by H

C++ book.

1999-01-15 Thread shaul
Can you recommend a good C++ book ? How about the 3rd edition of Stroustrup's book ? Is it better then the new edition of the C++ Primer ?