Re: CD-RW requirements?

On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Marc Shapiro wrote: > It did not specify seperate requirements for the varying OSs. I'd have to go with the fact that system requirements are never accurate. Always either triple the requirement, or cut in half. Reminds me of a Tom's Hardware guide video, the one where they

Re: CD-RW requirements?

Mike Dresser wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Marc Shapiro wrote: > > > Why do CD-RWs have such ungodly system requirements? > > > > I was just looking at a CD-RW (24/10/40) that actually specified Linux > > compatability (Slackware, but a Linux driver is a Linux driver, I would > > guess). The b

Re: CD-RW Requirements?

On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 21:20:16 -0500, Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >This is not specifically a Debian question, or even, really, a Linux >question, but I don't know where else to ask. > >Why do CD-RWs have such ungodly system requirements? > >I was just looking at a CD-RW (24/10/40) that

Re: CD-RW requirements?

On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Marc Shapiro wrote: > Why do CD-RWs have such ungodly system requirements? > > I was just looking at a CD-RW (24/10/40) that actually specified Linux > compatability (Slackware, but a Linux driver is a Linux driver, I would > guess). The box says that it requires a PII 350 MH

CD-RW requirements?

I posted this yesterday, and have not seen it in any succeeding digests, so I am posting again. Sorry if you get two copies of this. --- This is not specifically a Debian question, or even, really, a Linux question, but I don't know where e

CD-RW Requirements?

This is not specifically a Debian question, or even, really, a Linux question, but I don't know where else to ask. Why do CD-RWs have such ungodly system requirements? I was just looking at a CD-RW (24/10/40) that actually specified Linux compatability (Slackware, but a Linux driver is a Linux dr