On 26/11/13 21:38, assm...@skygate.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> That mouse thing moves the cursor ;)
>>
>
> I am sorry...I am not really used to this kind of mailing list
> conversation
No worries.
>
>
>>>
How does "$ testparm -v" on the new box compare with the same from the
box that did
Hi,
>
> This is why some (me) people dislike top posters and prefer to ignore
> them over posters who make the effort to interleave their replies. Not
> only does it require extra work to read the post and put it into context
> - it 'seems' to also encourages posters to *not* read what they are
>
Since the 3.x kernels there is a problem with samba. In my work
environment I have to revert to a 2.6 kernel to be able to mount a Windows
share.
Here is a reply on my question I have asked in a cifs-related list in
February this year:
"The user you're connecting as doesn't have access to do a l
This is why some (me) people dislike top posters and prefer to ignore
them over posters who make the effort to interleave their replies. Not
only does it require extra work to read the post and put it into context
- it 'seems' to also encourages posters to *not* read what they are
replying to. I c
Hi,
so I did some testing with a clone of the machine restored to the
state before the upgrade to wheezy.
Squeeze:
- Mount the share
- Disable the share on windows host
- Try to access the share with 'ls' results in 'no such device'
- Enable the share on windows host
- Try to access the share wit
On 21/11/13 22:39, assm...@skygate.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried your tricks, removing auto, adding _netdev but the problem
> still exists. I seems to happen when I am not working on the share for
> a certain amount of time. The share seems to be lost thenthis did
> not happen under wheezy. So I
Hi,
I tried your tricks, removing auto, adding _netdev but the problem
still exists. I seems to happen when I am not working on the share for
a certain amount of time. The share seems to be lost thenthis did
not happen under wheezy. So I am thinking about, what kind of code to
blame? mount.cif
On 19/11/13 23:33, assm...@skygate.de wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> since my upgrade to wheezy I have a problem with a cifs mount. It is a
> share of my windows host. The setup worked fine in debian squeeze.
>
> I mount this in a virtualbox guest via /etc/fstab like this:
>
> //myipadress/data /data c
Dear list,
since my upgrade to wheezy I have a problem with a cifs mount. It is a
share of my windows host. The setup worked fine in debian squeeze.
I mount this in a virtualbox guest via /etc/fstab like this:
//myipadress/data /data cifs uid=33,gid=33,auto,user=myuser,password=mypassword
0
9 matches
Mail list logo