|> > Plain old static device files can still work, udev is just a nice
|> > convenience that makes life easier.
|>
|> ... or would be if it actually worked.
What have you had trouble with?
I have 2.6.14.4 and udev 076 from testing and everything just worked (on
2 desktops and a laptop) with no
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:45:03 -0800
Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I'm using udev on this box. Not that I like it, not that I give a
> tinker's damn about demonstrating how big my d*ck is by how empty I can
> make /dev (and that emptiness has meant I've had to write rules for every
>
Carl Fink wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:29:17PM -0600, Jacob S wrote:
>
>
>>Plain old static device files can still work, udev is just a nice
>>convenience that makes life easier.
>
>
> ... or would be if it actually worked.
Works great for me!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:00:04PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
Udev on Sid requires 2.6.12 or newer kernels. I have 2.6.11 and 2.6.14 (which
must have udev). Until 2.6.14 is demonstrably working with udev, I do not
want to get rid of 2.6.11 (which uses devfs and current hotplu
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:29:17PM -0600, Jacob S wrote:
> Plain old static device files can still work, udev is just a nice
> convenience that makes life easier.
... or would be if it actually worked.
--
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Patriotism is supp
On 14 Dec 2005 22:41:27 -0500
David Zelinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Udev on Sid requires 2.6.12 or newer kernels. I have 2.6.11 and
> > 2.6.14 (which must have udev).
>
> When I upgraded from 2.4 kernel to 2.6.14 I also installed udev along
> t
David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Udev on Sid requires 2.6.12 or newer kernels. I have 2.6.11 and 2.6.14 (which
> must have udev).
When I upgraded from 2.4 kernel to 2.6.14 I also installed udev along
the way -- I don't remember why. But I later removed udev because
some device files we
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:00:04PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Udev on Sid requires 2.6.12 or newer kernels. I have 2.6.11 and 2.6.14 (which
> must have udev). Until 2.6.14 is demonstrably working with udev, I do not
> want to get rid of 2.6.11 (which uses devfs and current hotplug). Can udev be
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:00:04 +0200
David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If, indeed, this must be done--this provides hotplug functionality as
> well.
>
> Does it need to be in control? As of now, many things are modprobed
> before hotplug and hotplug says "already loaded". Might be quite
> di
If, indeed, this must be done--this provides hotplug functionality as well.
Does it need to be in control? As of now, many things are modprobed before
hotplug and hotplug says "already loaded". Might be quite difficult to find
and sort all this out. Hotplug/udev might be self-sufficient
without
10 matches
Mail list logo
