Re: Code forks, RH & Debian (was Re: [OT] Process on which processor)

2003-01-14 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 05:56:19PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 17:50, Colin Watson wrote: > > Be careful of applying the words "older" and "newer" to procps. There > > are two forks of its codebase, and I don't think their version numbers > > track each other. > > > > It woul

Code forks, RH & Debian (was Re: [OT] Process on which processor)

2003-01-14 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 17:50, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 12:32:43PM -0800, nate wrote: [snip] > Be careful of applying the words "older" and "newer" to procps. There > are two forks of its codebase, and I don't think their version numbers > track each other. > > It wouldn't be th