Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-17 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi all! I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of kernel.org. Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of the Debian GNU/Linux repositories. In order to generate the configuration, I've copied the file corresponding to this kernel to the directory of sources, /usr/src

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-17 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:32:59PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > Hi all! > > I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of kernel.org. > Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of the Debian > GNU/Linux repositories. > > In order to generate the configuration, I've copi

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-17 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi, Kumar. On Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:40:07 -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of kernel.org. > > Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of the Debian > > GNU/Linux repositories. > > > > In order to generate the configurati

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-17 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:26:39PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > > Well, the kernel build does check what your current config is, and > > based on that, asks you some new questions. One way I get around this > > is: > > > > cd > > cp /boot/config-$(uname -r) .config > > make menuconfig # choose

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-17 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi, Kumar. On Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:34:09 -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:26:39PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > > > Well, the kernel build does check what your current config is, and > > > based on that, asks you some new questions. One way I get around this > >

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-17 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Daniel, On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:41:11PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote: [snip menuconfig discussion] > This only works in the case of not using ARCH=x86_64 with make > menuconfig in the second time that is invoked. But when not using this > variable, the processor family returns to be like Pe

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-18 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-12-18 01:32 +0100, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of kernel.org. > Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of the Debian > GNU/Linux repositories. > > In order to generate the configuration, I've copied the file > corresponding

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-18 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi, Sven. On Friday, 18 December 2009 09:15:43 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > > I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of > > kernel.org. Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of > > the Debian GNU/Linux repositories. > > > > In order to generate the configuration,

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-18 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-12-18 16:56 +0100, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > I was trying installing and booting 2.6.26-2-amd64 kernel and then > compiling 2.6.32 kernel of the traditional way: > > # cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.32 > # cp /boot/config-`uname -r` ./.config > # make menuconfig > # make > > In this case I didn't use

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-19 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi, Sven. On Friday, 18 December 2009 17:34:22 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > > I was trying installing and booting 2.6.26-2-amd64 kernel and then > > compiling 2.6.32 kernel of the traditional way: > > > > # cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.32 > > # cp /boot/config-`uname -r` ./.config > > # make menuconfig

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-23 Thread Daniel Bareiro
On Saturday, 19 December 2009 16:19:31 -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > > > I assume that it must have differences between both kernels > > > versions; for that reason, as I've mentioned in another mail of > > > this thread, after to have copied the file, I followed a similar > > > procedure to whic

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-23 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-12-23 11:07 +0100, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > Reading [1] and [2], I already found the cause of this problem. The > configuration in "Executable file formats / Emulations" must be the > following one in order to use a kernel x86_64 in userland 32. > > [*] Kernel support for ELF binaries > [ ]

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-24 Thread Daniel Bareiro
On Wednesday, 23 December 2009 11:19:26 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > > b) Debian way compilation: > > > > b.1) Having booted an i386 kernel and userland 32: > > > > # cp /boot/config-`uname -r` ./.config > > > > # make ARCH=x86_64 menuconfig > > > > # fakeroot make-kpkg clean --cross-compile - -ar

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-24 Thread Stephen Powell
On 2009-12-17 at 21:32:59 -300, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > Hi all! > > I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of kernel.org. > Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of the Debian > GNU/Linux repositories. > > In order to generate the configuration, I've copied the fil

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-24 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi, Sven. On Wednesday, 23 December 2009 11:19:26 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > > b) Debian way compilation: > > > > b.1) Having booted an i386 kernel and userland 32: > > > > # cp /boot/config-`uname -r` ./.config > > > > # make ARCH=x86_64 menuconfig > > > > # fakeroot make-kpkg clean --cross-co

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-24 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Sorry to send this message twice, but I thought that for some reason it had not arrived at the list. Although it seems that both messages arrived with a delay of six hours. This can be due to some moderation of the list? On Thursday, 24 December 2009 09:45:54 -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > > > b

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-25 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-12-25 07:55 +0100, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > Sorry to send this message twice, but I thought that for some reason it > had not arrived at the list. Although it seems that both messages > arrived with a delay of six hours. This can be due to some moderation of > the list? This list is not mo

Re: Compiling Linux kernel

2009-12-25 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi, Sven. On Friday, 25 December 2009 09:53:53 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > > Sorry to send this message twice, but I thought that for some reason > > it had not arrived at the list. Although it seems that both messages > > arrived with a delay of six hours. This can be due to some > > moderation